hello,
just downloaded las ser version from cvs.
It seems that the acc module doesn't exist in the tree anymore. Does the new acc modules (acc_db, ...) replaces acc?
Do I miss?
Olivier
Oh I certainly hope not. That's a giant step backward to take a nice, handy abstracted class like acc that handles everything and split it into multiple classes each handling only one thing. That's so totally the opposite of the way things SHOULD go.
Next thing you know we won't have one XLOG module... it'll be XLOG_AVP, and XLOG_URI, etc, etc.
N.
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:45:31 +0200, olivier.taylor wrote
hello,
just downloaded las ser version from cvs.
It seems that the acc module doesn't exist in the tree anymore. Does the new acc modules (acc_db, ...) replaces acc?
Do I miss?
Olivier _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Yes... it appears that, in the interest of confusing things, acc has been split into acc_db, acc_radius, and acc_syslog. Instead of using acc to log to the db, radius, and syslog with all the same commands and modparams depending on how we configured it, now we'll need to split logging up into three separate commands, three separate modules, and three separate sets of modparams.
That seems like a giant leap backward in usability.
N.
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:45:31 +0200, olivier.taylor wrote
hello,
just downloaded las ser version from cvs.
It seems that the acc module doesn't exist in the tree anymore. Does the new acc modules (acc_db, ...) replaces acc?
Do I miss?
Olivier _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
olivier.taylor -
sip