hi wouldn't it be simpler to use remove_hf("..");

-A

* Federico Giannici giannici@neomedia.it [051105 19:07]:

brett-ser-list wrote:

...

I;m not entirely sure, but consume_credentials might take care of this..

No, it deletes only "used" credentials.

Anyway, I solved simply removing the Proxy-Authorization header fileds with a simple replace() function from every ACK, CANCEL and BYE messages (they shouldn't have it, anyway).

Bye.

...

---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Federico Giannici giannici@neomedia.it Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:50:29 +0100

...

I have found that some UAs (e.g Grandstream's ones) send the Proxy-Authorization header even in ACKs messages.

As we don't explicitly try to authenticate ACKs, we cannot use the consume_credentials() function. In fact, it seems that we have to call proxy_authorize() before we can use the consume_credentials(). But it's contrary to RFC to call proxy_authorize() for ACKs and CANCELs methods!

So, how can we prevent the Proxy-Authorization information to be forwarded to subsequent hops?

Thanks.

-- ___________________________________________________ __ |- giannici@neomedia.it |ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it ___________________________________________________

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers