11 Feb
2021
11 Feb
'21
5:44 p.m.
Using a domain name in R-R header may not be such a good idea:
Feb 11 12:12:06 lab /usr/bin/sip-proxy[735]: WARNING: rr [loose.c:799]
rr_do_force_send_socket(): no socket found to match second RR
(sip:tenantX.teams.tutpro.com:8007;transport=tls;r2=on;pm=0;savp=avp;lr)
Or is there some means to tell K, which FQDN maps to which IP address,
when there are many such FQDNs?
-- Juha
11 Feb
11 Feb
5:46 p.m.
That is the main reason I had previously thought it wasn’t possible!
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On Feb 11, 2021, at 11:45 AM, Juha Heinanen
<jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Using a domain name in R-R header may not be such a good idea:
Feb 11 12:12:06 lab /usr/bin/sip-proxy[735]: WARNING: rr [loose.c:799]
rr_do_force_send_socket(): no socket found to match second RR
(sip:tenantX.teams.tutpro.com:8007;transport=tls;r2=on;pm=0;savp=avp;lr)
Or is there some means to tell K, which FQDN maps to which IP address,
when there are many such FQDNs?
-- Juha
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
6:51 p.m.
Alex Balashov writes:
That is the main reason I had previously thought it
wasn’t possible!
Have you changed your mind?
The document
https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams
tells
Change in your configuration the existing record_route() function call
to this one:
record_route_preset("SBC-DNS-DOMAIN:5061;transport=tls",
"SBC-IP-ADDR:5060");
but does not tell, how to change loose_route() so that it would work on
the resulting Route headers.
It would be nice to learn the secret.
-- Juha
7:04 p.m.
On 11.02.21 18:51, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Alex Balashov writes:
Probably you confuse the people, that blog post is from Henning, not
from Alex ... or maybe you refer to another message from Alex and I am
out of topic here.
Cheers,
Daniel
That is the main reason I had previously thought
it wasn’t possible!
Have you changed your mind?
The document
https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams
tells
Change in your configuration the existing record_route() function call
to this one:
record_route_preset("SBC-DNS-DOMAIN:5061;transport=tls",
"SBC-IP-ADDR:5060");
but does not tell, how to change loose_route() so that it would work on
the resulting Route headers.
It would be nice to learn the secret.
Even before the socket name, it was possible using other parameters in
the record route to store information about what sockets to be used. The
warning message can be disabled with "enable_socket_mismatch_warning"
parameter for rr module, then use script operations to figure out the
socket from the parameters you added.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
7:08 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Probably you confuse the people, that blog post is
from Henning, not
from Alex ... or maybe you refer to another message from Alex and I am
out of topic here.
No, I was asking from Alex if he has changed his mind on the topic. I
know that Alex did not write the blog post.
-- Juha
7:37 p.m.
Had to remove Class 4 responses:
#modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;class=3;class=4")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;class=3")
Thanks,
AL
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:46 AM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
wrote:
That is the main reason I had previously thought it
wasn’t possible!
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On Feb 11, 2021, at 11:45 AM, Juha Heinanen
jh(a)tutpro.com wrote:
Using a domain name in R-R header may not be such a good idea:
Feb 11 12:12:06 lab /usr/bin/sip-proxy[735]: WARNING: rr [loose.c:799]
rr_do_force_send_socket(): no socket found to match second RR
(sip:tenantX.teams.tutpro.com:8007;transport=tls;r2=on;pm=0;savp=avp;lr)
Or is there some means to tell K, which FQDN maps to which IP address,
when there are many such FQDNs?
-- Juha
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
6:51 p.m.
On 11.02.21 17:44, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Using a domain name in R-R header may not be such a
good idea:
Feb 11 12:12:06 lab /usr/bin/sip-proxy[735]: WARNING: rr [loose.c:799]
rr_do_force_send_socket(): no socket found to match second RR
(sip:tenantX.teams.tutpro.com:8007;transport=tls;r2=on;pm=0;savp=avp;lr)
Or is there some means to tell K, which FQDN maps to which IP address,
when there are many such FQDNs?
Set names to the sockets
(https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#listen):
listen= ..... name "s1"
And then add parameter "sn=s1" to the specific Record-Route header.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
6:55 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Nice, thanks,
-- Juha
Or is there
some means to tell K, which FQDN maps to which IP address,
when there are many such FQDNs?
Set names to the sockets
(https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#listen):
listen= ..... name "s1"
And then add parameter "sn=s1" to the specific Record-Route header.
7:07 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Set names to the sockets
(https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#listen):
listen= ..... name "s1"
And then add parameter "sn=s1" to the specific Record-Route header.
If sockname_mode param has value 1:
modparam("rr", "sockname_mode", 1)
does it mean that ;sn=name param needs to be included in every R-R URI,
i.e, also in those that have an IP address that K is listening on?
Or may the ;sn param may be omitted in those URIs without causing
loose_route() to fail?
-- Juha
7:25 p.m.
Seems to be OK not to include ;sn param in IP address R-R URIs. At
least I didn't get any errors or warning to syslog when I called
loose_route() on in-dialog requests that had such Route headers.
-- Juha
1171
days inactive
1171
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alex Balashov -
alirsm -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Juha Heinanen