I didn't had this problems. I installed 4.7 over 5.0 and now I'm using
RTC 1.0 again (verified in the SIP messages of the Windows Messenger).
If this doesn't worked, try to find the rtcdll.dll in the windows
directory and then ....no, I won't tell you to delete dll's from your PC ;-)
there is also a second dll, but I don't know the exact name.
klaus
Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
Yes, Klaus...
As stated previously on the list, WM 5.0 introduced some "M$-extensions"....
4.6/4.7 honors in a better way RFCs...
Before reading the considerations of 5.0 extensions, I had it installed :(
After the readings, I try to uninstall it, but as stated on the list, some
DLLs stays.... My question is how to make a complete remove of 5.0 version
so that the system become clean to recieve 4.6/4.7 version? Any tip?
Edson.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
To: "CURRO_DOMINGUEZ" <CURRO_DOMINGUEZ(a)terra.es>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER and presence extensions
>You can try Windows Messenger 4.6/4.7 or
kphone under Linux.
>
>klaus
>
>CURRO_DOMINGUEZ wrote:
>
>
>>Hello everybody
>>
>>I am doing some tests aboute presence module and I would like to make
>>you some questions and comments. I've been diving into the mailing list
>>(a great way to learn) and I've configured SER with this:
>>
>>if (method=="SUBSCRIBE") {
>> if (t_newtran()){
>> handle_subscription("registrar");
>> break;
>> };
>>};
>>
>>Everything seems to work OK. I just want to work with 'open' and
'close'
>>states. But Windows Messenger 5.0 receives NOTIFY from SER and doesn't
>>update state. I think the matter is that WM doesn't understand the xml
>>file sent with NOTIFY, because use its own xml file.
>>
>>
>>Have you tested with any UA on Windows that use the standard XML file
>>(like SER) to manage presence? And where can I find specifications for
>>this XML file?
>>
>>I have read a Jan's mail(May-03) where he said that there are some
>>drafts that extends presence and that they were going to implement this
>>on SER. I would like to know whether these drafts are already RFC or
>>have been some advance on this feature.
>>
>>
>>Thank you very much.
>>
>>Curro
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>