28 Oct
2004
28 Oct
'04
11:31 a.m.
Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just
curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore and
avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a production environment.
Cheers,
Paul
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
28 Oct
28 Oct
11:35 a.m.
The next release will BE based on ser-0.8.99.
bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just
curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore and
avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a production environment.
Cheers,
Paul
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
11:42 a.m.
Thanks for the info. I now see that I didn't ask my question exactly right.
I'll ask the question correctly this time :-)
Have the maintainers of ser decided on a timeframe for when a stable release
based on ser-0.8.99 will be available?
Many Thanks.
Paul
--- Bogdan-Andrei IANCU <iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
The next release will BE based on ser-0.8.99.
bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just
curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore
and
avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a
production environment.
Cheers,
Paul
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
11:51 a.m.
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends
of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start
using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will
help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
Thanks for the info. I now see that I didn't ask my
question exactly right.
I'll ask the question correctly this time :-)
Have the maintainers of ser decided on a timeframe for when a stable release
based on ser-0.8.99 will be available?
Many Thanks.
Paul
--- Bogdan-Andrei IANCU <iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
The next release will BE based on ser-0.8.99.
bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just
curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore
and
avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a
production environment.
Cheers,
Paul
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
11:57 a.m.
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this
cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
<iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible.
This also depends
of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start
using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will
help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
12:01 p.m.
Please try to use as many feature as possible (especialy the new once)
and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or
serdev mailing list.
Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to
turn this
cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
<iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as
possible. This also depends
of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start
using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will
help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
1:16 p.m.
I've been using ser-0.8.99-dev7 through ser-0.8.99-dev12 with very good
success. The only problem I've seen is the recently fixed bug whereby the
location table in MySQL wasn't being populated.
I must admit I've not used the pike, jabber, msilo, pa, radius, postgres, or
cpl modules.
Also, we are very close to publishing a patch for using UDP sockets rather than
the FIFO or Unix Sockets. We still need to modify sems to take advantage of
this but our primary focus is getting serweb off the ser proxy server. We also
need to make sure that the current FIFO and unix sockets remain available for
those that want to use them. Hopefully this patch will be accepted by the
maintainers :-)
It would be really cool if we indeed get this fully functional and published to
the maintainers before the next stable release because I have a feeling that
many people could really benefit from seperating ser, serweb, and sems since
this gets the project one step closer to carrier-grade VoIP.
Cheers,
Paul
--- Bogdan-Andrei IANCU <iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Please try to use as many feature as possible
(especialy the new once)
and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or
serdev mailing list.
Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of
help to turn this
cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
<iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as
possible. This also depends
of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start
using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will
help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
9:56 p.m.
Java Rockx said:
Also, we are very close to publishing a patch for
using UDP sockets
rather than
the FIFO or Unix Sockets.
why unreliable udp instead of reliable tcp? if the system is distributed
to possibly far away hosts, tcp would seem a much better choice. also, tcp
would support tls.
-- juha
11:06 p.m.
Juha,
Thanks for the comment.
I don't disagree with anything you've said. The decision on UDP was based on
the fact that we're looking at a massive deployment on a VPN so TLS never
needed to be addressed.
NOTE: Massive = n > 500000+ subscribers
Add to this the fact that it would be clunky to call t_replicate() for a
potentially varying number of sip proxies and we came to the conclusion that a
multicast version of t_replicate() will do the trick for replicating REGISTER
messages to all the sip proxies on the VPN.
Thus we arrived at the UDP decision. If there are better ways to achieve
99.999% uptime while having independent ser, serweb, and sems farms the please
share. I'd love to validate our work or shoot holes in it before it goes
primetime.
Cheers,
Paul
--- Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Java Rockx said:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Also, we are very close to publishing a patch for
using UDP sockets
rather than
the FIFO or Unix Sockets.
why unreliable udp instead of reliable tcp? if the system is distributed
to possibly far away hosts, tcp would seem a much better choice. also, tcp
would support tls.
-- juha
29 Oct
29 Oct
6:04 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Is there an expected release date for ser-0.8.15??
At 05:06 AM 10/29/2004, Java Rockx wrote:
Juha,
Thanks for the comment.
I don't disagree with anything you've said. The decision on UDP was based on
the fact that we're looking at a massive deployment on a VPN so TLS never
needed to be addressed.
my personal choice has been to implement some of the FIFO functions to
SIP request processing to gain all transport and security checkes but
it appears that I am the only to like it.
NOTE: Massive = n > 500000+ subscribers
Add to this the fact that it would be clunky to call t_replicate() for a
potentially varying number of sip proxies and we came to the conclusion that a
multicast version of t_replicate() will do the trick for replicating REGISTER
messages to all the sip proxies on the VPN.
Thus we arrived at the UDP decision. If there are better ways to achieve
99.999% uptime while having independent ser, serweb, and sems farms the please
share. I'd love to validate our work or shoot holes in it before it goes
primetime.
a problem is lack of reliability in multicast.
-jiri
28 Oct
28 Oct
3:48 p.m.
Any time frame of introducing a variable timer for the call? At least two
timers, one for calls to ip phone and one for pstn.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 6:01 AM
To: MeLaO
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Is there an expected release date for ser-0.8.15??
Please try to use as many feature as possible (especialy the new once)
and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or
serdev mailing list.
Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
>Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this
>cutie into stable?
>
>
>On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
><iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>
>
>>not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends
>>of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start
>>using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will
>>help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs
head.
3:51 p.m.
Andrei committed for this job - his opinion will be more appropriate.
bogdan
Richard wrote:
Any time frame of introducing a variable timer for the
call? At least two
timers, one for calls to ip phone and one for pstn.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 6:01 AM
To: MeLaO
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Is there an expected release date for ser-0.8.15??
Please try to use as many feature as possible (especialy the new once)
and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or
serdev mailing list.
Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
>Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this
>cutie into stable?
>
>
>On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU
><iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends
>>of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start
>>using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will
>>help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs
>>
>>
head.
7377
days inactive
7378
days old
11 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Bogdan-Andrei IANCU -
Java Rockx -
Jiri Kuthan -
Juha Heinanen -
MeLaO -
Richard