Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore and avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a production environment.
Cheers, Paul
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
The next release will BE based on ser-0.8.99. bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore and avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a production environment.
Cheers, Paul
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Thanks for the info. I now see that I didn't ask my question exactly right. I'll ask the question correctly this time :-)
Have the maintainers of ser decided on a timeframe for when a stable release based on ser-0.8.99 will be available?
Many Thanks. Paul
--- Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
The next release will BE based on ser-0.8.99. bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore
and
avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a production environment.
Cheers, Paul
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
Thanks for the info. I now see that I didn't ask my question exactly right. I'll ask the question correctly this time :-)
Have the maintainers of ser decided on a timeframe for when a stable release based on ser-0.8.99 will be available?
Many Thanks. Paul
--- Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
The next release will BE based on ser-0.8.99. bogdan
Java Rockx wrote:
Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore
and
avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a production environment.
Cheers, Paul
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
Please try to use as many feature as possible (especialy the new once) and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or serdev mailing list. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I've been using ser-0.8.99-dev7 through ser-0.8.99-dev12 with very good success. The only problem I've seen is the recently fixed bug whereby the location table in MySQL wasn't being populated.
I must admit I've not used the pike, jabber, msilo, pa, radius, postgres, or cpl modules.
Also, we are very close to publishing a patch for using UDP sockets rather than the FIFO or Unix Sockets. We still need to modify sems to take advantage of this but our primary focus is getting serweb off the ser proxy server. We also need to make sure that the current FIFO and unix sockets remain available for those that want to use them. Hopefully this patch will be accepted by the maintainers :-)
It would be really cool if we indeed get this fully functional and published to the maintainers before the next stable release because I have a feeling that many people could really benefit from seperating ser, serweb, and sems since this gets the project one step closer to carrier-grade VoIP.
Cheers, Paul
--- Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Please try to use as many feature as possible (especialy the new once) and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or serdev mailing list. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs head.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Java Rockx said:
Also, we are very close to publishing a patch for using UDP sockets
rather than
the FIFO or Unix Sockets.
why unreliable udp instead of reliable tcp? if the system is distributed to possibly far away hosts, tcp would seem a much better choice. also, tcp would support tls.
-- juha
Juha,
Thanks for the comment.
I don't disagree with anything you've said. The decision on UDP was based on the fact that we're looking at a massive deployment on a VPN so TLS never needed to be addressed.
NOTE: Massive = n > 500000+ subscribers
Add to this the fact that it would be clunky to call t_replicate() for a potentially varying number of sip proxies and we came to the conclusion that a multicast version of t_replicate() will do the trick for replicating REGISTER messages to all the sip proxies on the VPN.
Thus we arrived at the UDP decision. If there are better ways to achieve 99.999% uptime while having independent ser, serweb, and sems farms the please share. I'd love to validate our work or shoot holes in it before it goes primetime.
Cheers, Paul
--- Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com wrote:
Java Rockx said:
Also, we are very close to publishing a patch for using UDP sockets
rather than
the FIFO or Unix Sockets.
why unreliable udp instead of reliable tcp? if the system is distributed to possibly far away hosts, tcp would seem a much better choice. also, tcp would support tls.
-- juha
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
At 05:06 AM 10/29/2004, Java Rockx wrote:
Juha,
Thanks for the comment.
I don't disagree with anything you've said. The decision on UDP was based on the fact that we're looking at a massive deployment on a VPN so TLS never needed to be addressed.
my personal choice has been to implement some of the FIFO functions to SIP request processing to gain all transport and security checkes but it appears that I am the only to like it.
NOTE: Massive = n > 500000+ subscribers
Add to this the fact that it would be clunky to call t_replicate() for a potentially varying number of sip proxies and we came to the conclusion that a multicast version of t_replicate() will do the trick for replicating REGISTER messages to all the sip proxies on the VPN.
Thus we arrived at the UDP decision. If there are better ways to achieve 99.999% uptime while having independent ser, serweb, and sems farms the please share. I'd love to validate our work or shoot holes in it before it goes primetime.
a problem is lack of reliability in multicast.
-jiri
Any time frame of introducing a variable timer for the call? At least two timers, one for calls to ip phone and one for pstn.
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei IANCU Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 6:01 AM To: MeLaO Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Is there an expected release date for ser-0.8.15??
Please try to use as many feature as possible (especialy the new once) and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or serdev mailing list. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs
head.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Andrei committed for this job - his opinion will be more appropriate. bogdan
Richard wrote:
Any time frame of introducing a variable timer for the call? At least two timers, one for calls to ip phone and one for pstn.
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei IANCU Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 6:01 AM To: MeLaO Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Is there an expected release date for ser-0.8.15??
Please try to use as many feature as possible (especialy the new once) and, if there is something wrong or a bug, please report to seruser or serdev mailing list. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
bogdan
MeLaO wrote:
Im actually running latest CVS, how can I be of help to turn this cutie into stable?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:51:16 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
not yet, but I hope we will do it as soon as possible. This also depends of the people who use ser. To speed the things up, they should start using and testing the unstable version as much as possible - this will help us a lot in making a new stable version out of the current cvs
head.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Bogdan-Andrei IANCU -
Java Rockx -
Jiri Kuthan -
Juha Heinanen -
MeLaO -
Richard