22 Oct
2009
22 Oct
'09
1:16 p.m.
ricardo,
in situation where you see higher priority valued gateway group selected
first, do you know if the lower priority valued group would be used if
none of the gateways in the higher priority valued gateway group can
serve the request? if it is used, then both exist in the hash table.
the list in the hash table is sorted by prefix length and priority.
-- juha
22 Oct
22 Oct
4:58 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
Hello Juha.
I was doing a few more tests and a more weird thing happened.
I was trying to replicate the problem with another prefix, and was using
the "id's" 132 and 133, correlative, however the problem persists.
Maybe I'm missing something in all this scenario. If I have more than
130 routes in the lcr table do need to set something else? Maybe the
lcr_hash_size??
By the way.. I'm using the phpmyadmin module to make the changes...
Regards,
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] En nombre de Juha Heinanen
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de octubre de 2009 8:17
Para: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match
priorities
ricardo,
in situation where you see higher priority valued gateway group selected
first, do you know if the lower priority valued group would be used if
none of the gateways in the higher priority valued gateway group can
serve the request? if it is used, then both exist in the hash table.
the list in the hash table is sorted by prefix length and priority.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:41 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
Ricardo Martinez writes:
I was trying to replicate the problem with another
prefix, and was using
the "id's" 132 and 133, correlative, however the problem persists.
id numbers should not have anything to do with this, because nowhere in
the module is id column used. the only thing that might matter is the
order in which the records are returned from database.
Maybe I'm missing something in all this scenario.
If I have more than
130 routes in the lcr table do need to set something else? Maybe the
lcr_hash_size??
if you have more than 128 routes, it would be advisable to increase the
size of the lcr hash table. you can do that by changing the value of
constant
#define DEF_LCR_HASH_SIZE 128
in lcr_mod.c
in your case, you could use 256 instead of 128.
-- juha
6:24 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
Juha.
Can i change the lcr_has_size from the configuration file with the
parameter?
modparam("lcr", "lcr_hash_size", 1024)
Another thing.
Looking at the lcr_mod.c file there is a parameter called MAX_NO_OF_GWS
defined as follows :
#define MAX_NO_OF_GWS 128
Can I increase this value too? Maybe 256 ?
Thanks,
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh@tutpro.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de octubre de 2009 12:41
Para: Ricardo Martinez
CC: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: RE: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match
priorities
Ricardo Martinez writes:
I was trying to replicate the problem with another
prefix, and was
using
the "id's" 132 and 133, correlative,
however the problem persists.
id numbers should not have anything to do with this, because nowhere in
the module is id column used. the only thing that might matter is the
order in which the records are returned from database.
Maybe I'm missing something in all this scenario.
If I have more
than
130 routes in the lcr table do need to set something
else? Maybe the
lcr_hash_size??
if you have more than 128 routes, it would be advisable to increase the
size of the lcr hash table. you can do that by changing the value of
constant
#define DEF_LCR_HASH_SIZE 128
in lcr_mod.c
in your case, you could use 256 instead of 128.
-- juha
6:13 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
Ricardo Martinez writes:
Can i change the lcr_has_size from the configuration
file with the
parameter?
modparam("lcr", "lcr_hash_size", 1024)
yes, you can do that.
Another thing.
Looking at the lcr_mod.c file there is a parameter called MAX_NO_OF_GWS
defined as follows :
#define MAX_NO_OF_GWS 128
Can I increase this value too? Maybe 256 ?
yes, you can increase that too, but there is no config variable for it.
so you need to recompile the module.
-- juha
9:12 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
I modified the MAX_NO_OF_GWS to 256
And the lcr_has_size to 256 and I'm still have the problem.
Do you have the chance to reproduce the problem with kamailio 1.5.2 ?
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh@tutpro.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de octubre de 2009 13:14
Para: Ricardo Martinez
CC: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: RE: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match
priorities
Ricardo Martinez writes:
Can i change the lcr_has_size from the configuration
file with the
parameter?
modparam("lcr", "lcr_hash_size", 1024)
yes, you can do that.
Another thing.
Looking at the lcr_mod.c file there is a parameter called
MAX_NO_OF_GWS
defined as follows :
#define MAX_NO_OF_GWS 128
Can I increase this value too? Maybe 256 ?
yes, you can increase that too, but there is no config variable for it.
so you need to recompile the module.
-- juha
23 Oct
23 Oct
8:50 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
Ricardo Martinez writes:
I modified the MAX_NO_OF_GWS to 256
And the lcr_has_size to 256 and I'm still have the problem.
Do you have the chance to reproduce the problem with kamailio 1.5.2 ?
i just tried with latest 1.5 version and priorities worked fine. i'm
thus unable to reproduce your problem. either you need to add more
debugging into the source or email me your gw and lcr tables.
-- juha
11:42 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
El Jueves, 22 de Octubre de 2009, Juha Heinanen escribió:
Hi Juha, as this limitation is not present in the module documentation, and
the module doesn't notify it when starting, it could create serious issues if
an admin adds more than 128 gateways and he doesn't inspect the module source
(really should he do that to realize of this limitation?).
So I propose two things:
1) Add this information to the module documentation in a clear way.
2) Add a check during module startup. The module could perform a "SELET
COUNT(*) FROM gw" and raise an error if the result is greater than
MAX_NO_OF_GWS.
Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
#define
MAX_NO_OF_GWS 128
Can I increase this value too? Maybe 256 ?
yes, you can increase that too, but there is no config variable for it.
so you need to recompile the module. 
3:12 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
1-> I'm able to have kamailio to keep opened the TCP connection by sending
CRLFCRLF keepalive within my application: this solve the issue.
2-> With (or without) SO_KEEPALIVE option, kamailio discard/close the
connection 50 seconds after my intial SIP message and 30 seconds after my
last SIP message. My registration is using 500 seconds and I got default
lifetime paratemer, which is 120 in the tcp_main.c code.
My problem is that I'm supposed to send CRLFCRLF with a frequency advised
between 95 seconds and 120 seconds (outbound draft keep alive). However,
kamailio has already closed the connection and it only works for lower
value.
Did I made a mistake somewhere...
-Note that for mobile device, the interval is supposed to be between 840
and 672 seconds.-
Tks for your help,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
3:17 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router TM module
will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non blocking).
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
3:38 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard
escribió:
Sorry that I missed to put the version of kamailio: I'm using branch 1.5
svnversion gives 5868M
ChangeLog last line is:
===================== 2009-04-29 Kamailio v1.5.1 released =====================
Seems like you are misunderstooding me: I'm working on my SIP stacks
against kamailio with no change. I'm not working "on" the tm module.
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router TM module
will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non blocking). --
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
3:44 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
Hi Aymeric!
Kamailio does not support SIP outbound. It should close TCP connection
after the timeout. The timeout can be specified with
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x#tcp_connectio…
So, do I get it right that this does not work (TCP connection closed
after 50 seconds by Kamailio although the default value is 120 seconds)?
(For outbound support probably the default value should be increased).
Further, usually the lifetime should be extended to the value of the
registration expiration. This can be done by using
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/registrar.html#id2477171
regards
klaus
Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric
Moizard escribió:
Sorry that I missed to put the version of kamailio: I'm using branch 1.5
svnversion gives 5868M
ChangeLog last line is:
===================== 2009-04-29 Kamailio v1.5.1 released
=====================
Seems like you are misunderstooding me: I'm working on my SIP stacks
against kamailio with no change. I'm not working "on" the tm module.
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router TM
module
will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non blocking). --
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:35 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Aymeric!
Kamailio does not support SIP outbound.
No issue there.
It should close TCP connection after
the timeout. The timeout can be specified with
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x#tcp_connectio…
So, do I get it right that this does not work (TCP connection closed after 50
seconds by Kamailio although the default value is 120 seconds)?
That's right.
I got feedback from other where it's behaving well: lifetime is 120.
(For outbound support probably the default value
should be increased).
It shouldn't! This is a correct value that comply with 95 to 120sec from
the outbound draft for TCP.
Further, usually the lifetime should be extended to
the value of the
registration expiration. This can be done by using
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/registrar.html#id2477171
I understood this. I wish to solve the issue and make sure there is no
bug in kamailio. ;)
So the question is: kamailio is setup to have lifetime=120 but is closing
my connection much earlier: 50 seconds after the connection was made and
30seconds after the last SIP message.
Aymeric
regards
klaus
Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric
Moizard escribió:
Sorry that I missed to put the version of kamailio: I'm using branch 1.5
svnversion gives 5868M
ChangeLog last line is:
===================== 2009-04-29 Kamailio v1.5.1 released
=====================
Seems like you are misunderstooding me: I'm working on my SIP stacks
against kamailio with no change. I'm not working "on" the tm module.
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router TM
module
will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non blocking). --
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6:25 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
Some additionnal information:
I tried several value for tcp_connection_lifetime!
tcp_connection_lifetime = 120 -> close TCP conn after 50 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 300 -> close TCP conn after 90 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 600 -> close TCP conn after 160 seconds
Do I have "tick" issue? Any idea?
I think I'm close to find either a bug or an issue with my kernel?
I got a timer running a route[] for statistics computation, in
case that would change something?
I'm using rtimer module: could this have an impact?
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Aymeric!
Kamailio does not support SIP outbound. It should close TCP connection after
the timeout. The timeout can be specified with
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x#tcp_connectio…
So, do I get it right that this does not work (TCP connection closed after 50
seconds by Kamailio although the default value is 120 seconds)?
(For outbound support probably the default value should be increased).
Further, usually the lifetime should be extended to the value of the
registration expiration. This can be done by using
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/registrar.html#id2477171
regards
klaus
Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric
Moizard escribió:
Sorry that I missed to put the version of kamailio: I'm using branch 1.5
svnversion gives 5868M
ChangeLog last line is:
===================== 2009-04-29 Kamailio v1.5.1 released
=====================
Seems like you are misunderstooding me: I'm working on my SIP stacks
against kamailio with no change. I'm not working "on" the tm module.
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router TM
module
will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non blocking). --
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
8:36 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
Some additionnal information:
I tried several value for tcp_connection_lifetime!
tcp_connection_lifetime = 120 -> close TCP conn after 50 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 300 -> close TCP conn after 90 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 600 -> close TCP conn after 160 seconds
Do I have "tick" issue? Any idea?
Are you using a non-standard OS? kernel? hardware?
Is the clock running correct on your OS?
I think I'm close to find either a bug or an issue
with my kernel?
I got a timer running a route[] for statistics computation, in
case that would change something?
Is the timer route executed correctly or is it also called too often?
klaus
I'm using rtimer module: could this have an
impact?
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi Aymeric!
>
> Kamailio does not support SIP outbound. It should close TCP connection
> after the timeout. The timeout can be specified with
> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x#tcp_connectio…
>
>
> So, do I get it right that this does not work (TCP connection closed
> after 50 seconds by Kamailio although the default value is 120 seconds)?
>
> (For outbound support probably the default value should be increased).
>
> Further, usually the lifetime should be extended to the value of the
> registration expiration. This can be done by using
> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/registrar.html#id2477171
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>>> El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
>>>> related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
>>>
>>> Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
>>> Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router
>>> TM module
>>> will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non
>>> blocking).
>>
>> Sorry that I missed to put the version of kamailio: I'm using branch 1.5
>> svnversion gives 5868M
>> ChangeLog last line is:
>> ===================== 2009-04-29 Kamailio v1.5.1 released
>> =====================
>>
>> Seems like you are misunderstooding me: I'm working on my SIP stacks
>> against kamailio with no change. I'm not working "on" the tm
module.
>>
>> Tks,
>> Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
>> amsip - http://www.antisip.com
>> osip2 - http://www.osip.org
>> eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
9:53 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
Hi Aymeric!
I justed tested on one of my proxies (kamailio 1.5) and with the default
setting (120s) it closes TCP connection always after 131 seconds - strange.
If I set to 30, the connection will be closed after 41 seconds.
If I set to 300, the connection will be closed after 311 seconds.
Looks like in my case there are always 11 seconds added (maybe some
other timeouts before the connection enters the "idle" state in the TCP
handler).
Anyway, that does not answer the problems you are experiencing.
regards
klaus
Klaus Darilion schrieb:
Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
Some additionnal information:
I tried several value for tcp_connection_lifetime!
tcp_connection_lifetime = 120 -> close TCP conn after 50 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 300 -> close TCP conn after 90 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 600 -> close TCP conn after 160 seconds
Do I have "tick" issue? Any idea?
Are you using a non-standard OS? kernel? hardware?
Is the clock running correct on your OS?
I think I'm close to find either a bug or an
issue with my kernel?
I got a timer running a route[] for statistics computation, in
case that would change something?
Is the timer route executed correctly or is it also called too often?
klaus
I'm using rtimer module: could this have an
impact?
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi Aymeric!
>
> Kamailio does not support SIP outbound. It should close TCP
> connection after the timeout. The timeout can be specified with
> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x#tcp_connectio…
>
>
> So, do I get it right that this does not work (TCP connection closed
> after 50 seconds by Kamailio although the default value is 120 seconds)?
>
> (For outbound support probably the default value should be increased).
>
> Further, usually the lifetime should be extended to the value of the
> registration expiration. This can be done by using
> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/registrar.html#id2477171
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>>> El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
>>>> related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
>>>
>>> Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
>>> Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router
>>> TM module
>>> will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non
>>> blocking).
>>
>> Sorry that I missed to put the version of kamailio: I'm using branch
>> 1.5
>> svnversion gives 5868M
>> ChangeLog last line is:
>> ===================== 2009-04-29 Kamailio v1.5.1 released
>> =====================
>>
>> Seems like you are misunderstooding me: I'm working on my SIP stacks
>> against kamailio with no change. I'm not working "on" the tm
module.
>>
>> Tks,
>> Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
>> amsip - http://www.antisip.com
>> osip2 - http://www.osip.org
>> eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
11:17 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Aymeric!
I justed tested on one of my proxies (kamailio 1.5) and with the default
setting (120s) it closes TCP connection always after 131 seconds - strange.
If I set to 30, the connection will be closed after 41 seconds.
If I set to 300, the connection will be closed after 311 seconds.
modparam("rtimer", "timer",
"name=tst;interval=300;mode=1;")
Using this, my timer is called every 75 seconds ;(
My linux is a standar ovh kernel "2.6.28.4-xxxx-std-ipv4-32 #2 SMP". I
already got issue with the SIP NAT module statically linked into
the kernel that I couldn't remove... and once more, the kernel...
I will try another kernel after some backup.
Looks like in my case there are always 11 seconds
added (maybe some other
timeouts before the connection enters the "idle" state in the TCP handler).
Anyway, that does not answer the problems you are experiencing.
Right. But I'm getting closer!
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
regards
klaus
Klaus Darilion schrieb:
Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
Some additionnal information:
I tried several value for tcp_connection_lifetime!
tcp_connection_lifetime = 120 -> close TCP conn after 50 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 300 -> close TCP conn after 90 seconds
tcp_connection_lifetime = 600 -> close TCP conn after 160 seconds
Do I have "tick" issue? Any idea?
Are you using a non-standard OS? kernel? hardware?
Is the clock running correct on your OS?
I think I'm close to find either a bug or an
issue with my kernel?
I got a timer running a route[] for statistics computation, in
case that would change something?
Is the timer route executed correctly or is it also called too often?
klaus
I'm using rtimer module: could this have an
impact?
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi Aymeric!
>
> Kamailio does not support SIP outbound. It should close TCP connection
> after the timeout. The timeout can be specified with
> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x#tcp_connectio…
>
> So, do I get it right that this does not work (TCP connection closed
> after 50 seconds by Kamailio although the default value is 120 seconds)?
>
> (For outbound support probably the default value should be increased).
>
> Further, usually the lifetime should be extended to the value of the
> registration expiration. This can be done by using
> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/registrar.html#id2477171
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>>> El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
>>>> related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
>>>
>>> Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
>>> Please take into account that for Kamailio next version SIP-Router TM
>>> module
>>> will be used, which has received LOT of love for TCP (i.e: non
>>> blocking).
>>
>> Sorry that I missed to put the version of kamailio: I'm using branch 1.5
>> svnversion gives 5868M
>> ChangeLog last line is:
>> ===================== 2009-04-29 Kamailio v1.5.1 released
>> =====================
>>
>> Seems like you are misunderstooding me: I'm working on my SIP stacks
>> against kamailio with no change. I'm not working "on" the tm
module.
>>
>> Tks,
>> Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
>> amsip - http://www.antisip.com
>> osip2 - http://www.osip.org
>> eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
11:49 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
My linux is a standar ovh kernel
"2.6.28.4-xxxx-std-ipv4-32 #2 SMP". I
already got issue with the SIP NAT module statically linked into
the kernel that I couldn't remove... and once more, the kernel...
I will try another kernel after some backup.
I also have a OVH server. What do you mean with "SIP NAT module statically
linked into the kernel"? I've never detected a SIP issue in my server (in
which I run lot of SIP stuff :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
24 Oct
24 Oct
11:10 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard
escribió:
> My linux is a standar ovh kernel "2.6.28.4-xxxx-std-ipv4-32 #2 SMP". I
> already got issue with the SIP NAT module statically linked into
> the kernel that I couldn't remove... and once more, the kernel...
>
> I will try another kernel after some backup.
I also have a OVH server. What do you mean with
"SIP NAT module
statically linked into the kernel"? I've never detected a SIP issue in my
server (in which I run lot of SIP stuff :)
With some old kernel, the masquerading module was dropping my 200 ok
answers for re-INVITE. This was happening to me may be a year or 2 ago.
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
3:25 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
I guess I found my issue:
*2009-07-13 12:40 Carsten Bock, <carsten at bock dot info>
*
* * [r5899] timer.c:
* Fix double increase of jiffy-value.
* - As noticed by Daniel.
I'll update and see if it fixes all!
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric
Moizard escribió:
> My linux is a standar ovh kernel "2.6.28.4-xxxx-std-ipv4-32 #2 SMP". I
> already got issue with the SIP NAT module statically linked into
> the kernel that I couldn't remove... and once more, the kernel...
>
> I will try another kernel after some backup.
I also have a OVH server. What do you mean with
"SIP NAT module statically
linked into the kernel"? I've never detected a SIP issue in my server (in
which I run lot of SIP stuff :)
With some old kernel, the masquerading module was dropping my 200 ok answers
for re-INVITE. This was happening to me may be a year or 2 ago.
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
4:27 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] lifetime and TCP connection timeout
last input,
I confirm that upgrading to latest svn 1.5 branch fix all my jiffies/timer
issue. I was guilty to use a *pretty* old version...
I now have 131 seconds delay for a lifetime of 120 and my statistics are
computed every 300 to 301 seconds (as expected). It probably means the
timer are working nicely but the lifetime algo has some minor issue. That
would not affect anything if this value is kept higher than 120 seconds
anyway!
Tks for all,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
I guess I found my issue:
*2009-07-13 12:40 Carsten Bock, <carsten at bock dot info>
*
* * [r5899] timer.c:
* Fix double increase of jiffy-value.
* - As noticed by Daniel.
I'll update and see if it fixes all!
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
>>> El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
>>> My linux is a standar ovh kernel "2.6.28.4-xxxx-std-ipv4-32 #2
SMP". I
>>> already got issue with the SIP NAT module statically linked into
>>> the kernel that I couldn't remove... and once more, the kernel...
>>>
>>> I will try another kernel after some backup.
>
>> I also have a OVH server. What do you mean with "SIP NAT module statically
>> linked into the kernel"? I've never detected a SIP issue in my server
(in
>> which I run lot of SIP stuff :)
>
> With some old kernel, the masquerading module was dropping my 200 ok
> answers for re-INVITE. This was happening to me may be a year or 2 ago.
>
> Tks,
> Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
> amsip - http://www.antisip.com
> osip2 - http://www.osip.org
> eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
23 Oct
23 Oct
6:28 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
Hi Juha, as this limitation is not present in the
module
documentation, and the module doesn't notify it when starting, it
could create serious issues if an admin adds more than 128 gateways
and he doesn't inspect the module source
(really should he do that to realize of this limitation?).
inaki,
there is this piece of code in reload_gws_and_lcrs() function:
if (RES_ROW_N(res) + 1 > MAX_NO_OF_GWS) {
LM_ERR("too many gateways\n");
goto gw_err;
}
what do you mean by "the module doesn't notify it when starting"?
1) Add this information to the module documentation in
a clear way.
i can also add info about the limit in module documentation.
-- juha
10:05 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Juha Heinanen escribió:
It would be nice :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
I didn't know that.
Hi Juha, as this limitation is not present in the
module
documentation, and the module doesn't notify it when starting, it
could create serious issues if an admin adds more than 128 gateways
and he doesn't inspect the module source
(really should he do that to realize of this limitation?).
inaki,
there is this piece of code in reload_gws_and_lcrs() function:
if (RES_ROW_N(res) + 1 > MAX_NO_OF_GWS) {
LM_ERR("too many gateways\n");
goto gw_err;
} what do you mean by "the module doesn't
notify it when starting"?
IMHO Kamailio shouln't start if there are more gateways than MAX_NO_OF_GWS.
This is, lcr module should give an error. Does it? (I've not tryed it).
1) Add this
information to the module documentation in a clear way.
i can also add info about the limit in module documentation.
24 Oct
24 Oct
9:07 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
is is done.
-- juha
IMHO Kamailio shouln't start if there are more
gateways than MAX_NO_OF_GWS.
This is, lcr module should give an error. Does it? (I've not tryed
it).
the piece of code that i showed does that.
i can also add
info about the limit in module documentation.
It would be nice :)
5:30 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] LCR problem with "id" column and match priorities
El Sábado, 24 de Octubre de 2009, Juha Heinanen escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
is is done.
Yes, I read it in the commits :)
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
IMHO Kamailio shouln't start if there are
more gateways than
MAX_NO_OF_GWS. This is, lcr module should give an error. Does it? (I've
not tryed it).
the piece of code that i showed does that.
i can
also add info about the limit in module documentation.
It would be nice :)
5520
days inactive
5522
days old
24 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Aymeric Moizard -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
jh＠tutpro.com -
Klaus Darilion -
Ricardo Martinez