Yes, it seems really strange also to me. I've tried with both SER-0.9.6 and OpenSER-1.2.2 on a Gentoo-linux And in both cases there is the same problem... Do you think that can be a problem of installation/compiling? Have ever heard something like that?

-Stefano > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] > Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 18.28 > A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] R: R: Loadbalancing for interco > > I think there is some confusion here ... SER doesn't change contacts by > the action referred to > bellow. > > -jiri > > At 17:54 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote: > >It is the simplest ser.cfg you can imagine: > > > > Route { > > forward(z.z.z.z,5060); > > } > > > > > >The message enter in SER (y.y.y.y) as: > > > > U x.x.x.x:5060 -> y.y.y.y:5060 > > REGISTER sip:213.203.128.126 SIP/2.0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > x.x.x.x:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKFCDF5014775145F7BBFB33B621BC8BC0. > > From: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748. > > To: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>. > > Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102@x.x.x.x:5060>. > > Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD(a)y.y.y.y. > > CSeq: 60558 REGISTER. > > Expires: 120. > > Max-Forwards: 70. > > User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m. > > Content-Length: 0. > > > >And goes out as: > > > > U y.y.y.y:5060 -> z.z.z.z:5060 > > REGISTER sip:y.y.y.y SIP/2.0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:5060;branch=0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >

> BC0. > > From: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748. > > To: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>. > > Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y:5060>. > > Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD(a)y.y.y.y. > > CSeq: 60558 REGISTER. > > Expires: 120. > > Max-Forwards: 70. > > User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m. > > Content-Length: 0. > > > > > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- > >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] > >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.41 > >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] R: Loadbalancing for interco > >> > >> I haven't seen your config file, but normally it does not change > Contacts. > >> It changes contacts if it is configured to deal with NATs. > >> > >> -jiri > >> > >> At 17:20 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote: > >> >Ok, thanks for your answer, I understand your position. > >> > > >> >Anyway I cannot understand why SER modify the Contact header

> any > >> instruction about that in the config file...is there any reason > concerning > >> RFC compliance? > >> > > >> >Best regards, > >> >Stefano > >> > > >> >> -----Messaggio originale----- > >> >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] > >> >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.09 > >> >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >> >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] Loadbalancing for interco > >> >> > >> >> Well, load-balancing is not easy. To deal with issues like you

> >> >> describing, > >> >> your best choice is a load-balancer which is capable of working

> >> >> transparent > >> >> mode. We have such in our intelligence, some work, some less so,

> me > >> >> know > >> >> if you need some intelligence on this. > >> >> > >> >> -jiri > >> >> > >> >> At 12:23 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote: > >> >> >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message > >> >> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > >> >> > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8251E.664EA61A" > >> >> > > >> >> >Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> >we are trying to do the same with our servers but we have some > problem > >> >> with registrations: > >> >> >it seem that when the REGISTER message pass through SER, the

> part > >> of > >> >> Contact field is modified with the local address of SER. > >> >> >Is it a misconfiguration problem? > >> >> >Do you have experience in balancing also the registrations? > >> >> > > >> >> >Thanks, > >> >> >Stefano > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on SER

_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers