25 Jan
2007
25 Jan
'07
3:10 p.m.
Hi everybody,
OpenSER 1.2.0 has now the capability to do DNS based failover, according
to RFC3263 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3263.txt).
The SIP resolver was enhanced to to be able to save and resume later the
DNS queries in order to get all possible IP destinations. The resolving
process is step-by-step done (get next IP only on demand) to minimize
the total number of DNS queries. So having this support does not imply,
in normal processing, more load on the DNS server. Additional queries
are done only when needed (after failure detected).
The scanning for new IP destinations is done by the SIP resolver on all
DNS levels: NAPTR, SRV, A.
Both core and TM are using this new feature.
In core, the stateless forwarding can do only DNS-based failover at
transport level (if no egress interface found or send operation
failed due whatever reason).
In TM, the DNS-based failover is extended to transaction level. If the
transaction completes with 503 or 408 with no reply, automatically, a
new branch will be fork if any destination IP can be found by the DNS
resolver.
Read more here http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN103
For controlling this feature use:
- newly added core parameter "disable_dns_failover" - use to
generally disable the DNS-based failover. By default is false.
- in TM, t_relay() take a new flag for turning off the DNS-based
failover. This setting is per transaction. By default, the failover is done.
Any feedback is appreciated.
regards,
Bogdan
25 Jan
25 Jan
4:39 p.m.
That's very good news, this will definitely simplify our openser config.
I'll let you know once I've tested this new feature.
I'm impressed,
Christian
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
OpenSER 1.2.0 has now the capability to do DNS based failover, according
to RFC3263 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3263.txt).
The SIP resolver was enhanced to to be able to save and resume later the
DNS queries in order to get all possible IP destinations. The resolving
process is step-by-step done (get next IP only on demand) to minimize
the total number of DNS queries. So having this support does not imply,
in normal processing, more load on the DNS server. Additional queries
are done only when needed (after failure detected).
The scanning for new IP destinations is done by the SIP resolver on all
DNS levels: NAPTR, SRV, A.
Both core and TM are using this new feature.
In core, the stateless forwarding can do only DNS-based failover at
transport level (if no egress interface found or send operation
failed due whatever reason).
In TM, the DNS-based failover is extended to transaction level. If the
transaction completes with 503 or 408 with no reply, automatically, a
new branch will be fork if any destination IP can be found by the DNS
resolver.
Read more here http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN103
For controlling this feature use:
- newly added core parameter "disable_dns_failover" - use to
generally disable the DNS-based failover. By default is false.
- in TM, t_relay() take a new flag for turning off the DNS-based
failover. This setting is per transaction. By default, the failover is
done.
Any feedback is appreciated.
regards,
Bogdan
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:04 p.m.
Hi Christian,
note that as the DNS-based failover uses also the NAPTR records, the
protocol may also change :). Of course, depends on your proxy settings
(if tcp / tls is enabled).
Regards,
Bogdan
Christian Schlatter wrote:
That's very good news, this will definitely
simplify our openser
config. I'll let you know once I've tested this new feature.
I'm impressed,
Christian
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
OpenSER 1.2.0 has now the capability to do DNS based failover,
according to RFC3263 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3263.txt).
The SIP resolver was enhanced to to be able to save and resume later
the DNS queries in order to get all possible IP destinations. The
resolving process is step-by-step done (get next IP only on demand)
to minimize the total number of DNS queries. So having this support
does not imply, in normal processing, more load on the DNS server.
Additional queries are done only when needed (after failure detected).
The scanning for new IP destinations is done by the SIP resolver on
all DNS levels: NAPTR, SRV, A.
Both core and TM are using this new feature.
In core, the stateless forwarding can do only DNS-based failover at
transport level (if no egress interface found or send operation
failed due whatever reason).
In TM, the DNS-based failover is extended to transaction level. If
the transaction completes with 503 or 408 with no reply,
automatically, a new branch will be fork if any destination IP can be
found by the DNS resolver.
Read more here http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN103
For controlling this feature use:
- newly added core parameter "disable_dns_failover" - use to
generally disable the DNS-based failover. By default is false.
- in TM, t_relay() take a new flag for turning off the DNS-based
failover. This setting is per transaction. By default, the failover
is done.
Any feedback is appreciated.
regards,
Bogdan
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:02 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] NEW FEATURE: DNS-based failover
Hi Bogdan!
Good news. How are the DNS lookups done in detail? E.g. the following setup:
t_relay to domain.com:
@domain.com
NAPTR 90 50 "s" "SIP+D2T" "" _sip._tcp.domain.com.
NAPTR 100 50 "s" "SIP+D2U" "" _sip._udp.domain.com.
@_sip._tcp.domain.com.
SRV 0 0 6060 sip1.domain.com.
SRV 1 10 6060 sip2.domain.com.
@_sip._udp.domain.com.
SRV 0 0 6060 sip1.domain.com.
SRV 1 10 6060 sip4.domain.com.
sip1.domain.com A 1.2.3.4
sip2.domain.com A 2.2.3.4
sip2.domain.com A 2.2.3.5
sip4.domain.com A 4.2.3.4
Is the following assumption correct?
1. lookup NAPTR domain.com
2. lookup SRV _sip._tcp.domain.com
3. lookup A sip1.domain.com
4. request to 1.2.3.4; if failure
5. lookup A sip2.domain.com
6. request to 2.2.3.4; if failure
7. request to 2.2.3.5; if failure
8. lookup SRV _sip._udp.domain.com
9. (sip1 cached) send request to 1.2.3.4; if failure
10. lookup A sip4.domain.com
11 request to 4.2.3.4; if failure
12 reply error
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
OpenSER 1.2.0 has now the capability to do DNS based failover, according
to RFC3263 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3263.txt).
The SIP resolver was enhanced to to be able to save and resume later the
DNS queries in order to get all possible IP destinations. The resolving
process is step-by-step done (get next IP only on demand) to minimize
the total number of DNS queries. So having this support does not imply,
in normal processing, more load on the DNS server. Additional queries
are done only when needed (after failure detected).
The scanning for new IP destinations is done by the SIP resolver on all
DNS levels: NAPTR, SRV, A.
Both core and TM are using this new feature.
In core, the stateless forwarding can do only DNS-based failover at
transport level (if no egress interface found or send operation
failed due whatever reason).
In TM, the DNS-based failover is extended to transaction level. If the
transaction completes with 503 or 408 with no reply, automatically, a
new branch will be fork if any destination IP can be found by the DNS
resolver.
Read more here http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN103
For controlling this feature use:
- newly added core parameter "disable_dns_failover" - use to
generally disable the DNS-based failover. By default is false.
- in TM, t_relay() take a new flag for turning off the DNS-based
failover. This setting is per transaction. By default, the failover is
done.
Any feedback is appreciated.
regards,
Bogdan
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Klaus Darilion
nic.at
5:08 p.m.
New subject: [Users] Re: [Devel] NEW FEATURE: DNS-based failover
Hi Klaus,
yes, that is more than correct. You example points out exactly what I
was warning Christian of - during DNS-based failover, the used protocol
may changes, based on the DNS records and proxy configuration.
regards,
Bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Bogdan!
Good news. How are the DNS lookups done in detail? E.g. the following
setup:
t_relay to domain.com:
@domain.com
NAPTR 90 50 "s" "SIP+D2T" "" _sip._tcp.domain.com.
NAPTR 100 50 "s" "SIP+D2U" "" _sip._udp.domain.com.
@_sip._tcp.domain.com.
SRV 0 0 6060 sip1.domain.com.
SRV 1 10 6060 sip2.domain.com.
@_sip._udp.domain.com.
SRV 0 0 6060 sip1.domain.com.
SRV 1 10 6060 sip4.domain.com.
sip1.domain.com A 1.2.3.4
sip2.domain.com A 2.2.3.4
sip2.domain.com A 2.2.3.5
sip4.domain.com A 4.2.3.4
Is the following assumption correct?
1. lookup NAPTR domain.com
2. lookup SRV _sip._tcp.domain.com
3. lookup A sip1.domain.com
4. request to 1.2.3.4; if failure
5. lookup A sip2.domain.com
6. request to 2.2.3.4; if failure
7. request to 2.2.3.5; if failure
8. lookup SRV _sip._udp.domain.com
9. (sip1 cached) send request to 1.2.3.4; if failure
10. lookup A sip4.domain.com
11 request to 4.2.3.4; if failure
12 reply error
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
OpenSER 1.2.0 has now the capability to do DNS based failover,
according to RFC3263 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3263.txt).
The SIP resolver was enhanced to to be able to save and resume later
the DNS queries in order to get all possible IP destinations. The
resolving process is step-by-step done (get next IP only on demand)
to minimize the total number of DNS queries. So having this support
does not imply, in normal processing, more load on the DNS server.
Additional queries are done only when needed (after failure detected).
The scanning for new IP destinations is done by the SIP resolver on
all DNS levels: NAPTR, SRV, A.
Both core and TM are using this new feature.
In core, the stateless forwarding can do only DNS-based failover at
transport level (if no egress interface found or send operation
failed due whatever reason).
In TM, the DNS-based failover is extended to transaction level. If
the transaction completes with 503 or 408 with no reply,
automatically, a new branch will be fork if any destination IP can be
found by the DNS resolver.
Read more here http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN103
For controlling this feature use:
- newly added core parameter "disable_dns_failover" - use to
generally disable the DNS-based failover. By default is false.
- in TM, t_relay() take a new flag for turning off the DNS-based
failover. This setting is per transaction. By default, the failover
is done.
Any feedback is appreciated.
regards,
Bogdan
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
13 Apr
13 Apr
3:46 p.m.
On Thursday 25 January 2007 15:10, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Any feedback is appreciated.
For me, it doesn't work at all. I get the same behaviour of OpenSER 1.2.x as
with 1.1.x. I can see that SER does a SRV query to the DNS which should
return 2 entries with different priorities. SER then only tries the lower
priority one. If that fails, the script ends.
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:sip_resolvehost2: no port, has
proto -> do SRV lookup!
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:do_srv_lookup:
SRV(_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net) = out_sip1.domain.net:5060
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: check_via_address(123.123.123.123,
123.123.123.123, 0)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
500000
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]:
0xb3a4bc6c (1760600000)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
2
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]:
0xb3a4bc88 (1762)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:t_relay_to: new transaction
fwd'ed
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list
(nil)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0xb3a4bc6c
next=(nil), timeout=1760600000
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request
resending (t=0xb3a4bb20, INVITE si ... )
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
1000000
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[5]:
0xb3a4bc6c (1761600000)
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: timer routine:5,tl=0xb3a4bc6c
next=(nil), timeout=1761600000
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request
resending (t=0xb3a4bb20, INVITE si ... )
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
2000000
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[6]:
0xb3a4bc6c (1763600000)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0xb3a4bc88
next=(nil), timeout=1762
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: final_response_handler:stop
retr. and send CANCEL (0xb3a4bb20)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response:
T_code=100, new_code=408
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:t_pick_branch: picked branch
0, code 408
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0,
relay=0
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: check_via_address(217.114.103.90,
217.114.103.90, 0)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
500000
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]:
0xb3a4bbe8 (1762500000)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
2
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]:
0xb3a4bc04 (1764)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: sent
buf=0x81651e8: SIP/2.0 4..., shmem=0xb3a4da08: SIP/2.0 4
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DBG: trans=0xb3a4bb20, callback type
128, id 0 entered
# dig _sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net SRV
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4 <<>> _sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net SRV
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36981
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net. IN SRV
;; ANSWER SECTION:
_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net. 3600 IN SRV 101 100 5060 out_sip2.domain.net.
_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net. 3600 IN SRV 100 100 5060 out_sip1.domain.net.
;; Query time: 63 msec
--
Regards,
Alex Hermann
4:40 p.m.
Hi Alex,
did you receive any provisional reply from UAS before the timeout event?
regards,
bogdan
Alex Hermann wrote:
On Thursday 25 January 2007 15:10, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
wrote:
Any feedback is appreciated.
For me, it doesn't work at all. I get the same behaviour of OpenSER 1.2.x as
with 1.1.x. I can see that SER does a SRV query to the DNS which should
return 2 entries with different priorities. SER then only tries the lower
priority one. If that fails, the script ends.
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:sip_resolvehost2: no port, has
proto -> do SRV lookup!
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:do_srv_lookup:
SRV(_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net) = out_sip1.domain.net:5060
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: check_via_address(123.123.123.123,
123.123.123.123, 0)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
500000
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]:
0xb3a4bc6c (1760600000)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
2
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]:
0xb3a4bc88 (1762)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:t_relay_to: new transaction
fwd'ed
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:tm:UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list
(nil)
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0xb3a4bc6c
next=(nil), timeout=1760600000
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request
resending (t=0xb3a4bb20, INVITE si ... )
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
1000000
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[5]:
0xb3a4bc6c (1761600000)
Apr 13 14:54:33 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: timer routine:5,tl=0xb3a4bc6c
next=(nil), timeout=1761600000
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : request
resending (t=0xb3a4bb20, INVITE si ... )
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
2000000
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[6]:
0xb3a4bc6c (1763600000)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: retransmission_handler : done
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0xb3a4bc88
next=(nil), timeout=1762
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: final_response_handler:stop
retr. and send CANCEL (0xb3a4bb20)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:t_should_relay_response:
T_code=100, new_code=408
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:t_pick_branch: picked branch
0, code 408
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0,
relay=0
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: check_via_address(217.114.103.90,
217.114.103.90, 0)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
500000
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]:
0xb3a4bbe8 (1762500000)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is
2
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]:
0xb3a4bc04 (1764)
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: sent
buf=0x81651e8: SIP/2.0 4..., shmem=0xb3a4da08: SIP/2.0 4
Apr 13 14:54:34 sip1 outbound1[17836]: DBG: trans=0xb3a4bb20, callback type
128, id 0 entered
# dig _sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net SRV
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4 <<>> _sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net SRV
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36981
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net. IN SRV
;; ANSWER SECTION:
_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net. 3600 IN SRV 101 100 5060 out_sip2.domain.net.
_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net. 3600 IN SRV 100 100 5060 out_sip1.domain.net.
;; Query time: 63 msec
4:57 p.m.
On Friday 13 April 2007 16:40, you wrote:
Hi Alex,
did you receive any provisional reply from UAS before the timeout event?
No, the failing node was inserted for testing purposes. It has nothing
listening on that port.
I'm a bit worried about this line:
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:do_srv_lookup:
SRV(_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net) = out_sip1.domain.net:5060
shouldn't it mention both hosts?
--
Regards,
Alex Hermann
5:52 p.m.
Alex Hermann wrote:
On Friday 13 April 2007 16:40, you wrote:
no - only the one selected for usage is printed. I'll try to prepare a
patch to introduce more debug messages to trace the problem.
regards,
bogdan
Hi Alex,
did you receive any provisional reply from UAS before the timeout event?
No, the failing node was inserted for testing purposes. It has nothing
listening on that port.
I'm a bit worried about this line:
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:do_srv_lookup:
SRV(_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net) = out_sip1.domain.net:5060
shouldn't it mention both hosts?
19 Apr
19 Apr
1:23 p.m.
Hi Alex,
apply the attached patch - it will print some more debug log that will
help in finding the problem.
Regards,
Bogdan
Alex Hermann wrote:
On Friday 13 April 2007 16:40, you wrote:
Index: resolve.c
===================================================================
--- resolve.c (revision 2027)
+++ resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -722,6 +722,8 @@
n->vals[l].ival = get_srv(r)->port;
n->vals[l].sval = p;
memcpy( p, get_srv(r)->name, get_srv(r)->name_len );
+ DBG("DEBUG:a2dns_node: storing %s:%d\n",
+ n->vals[l].sval,n->vals[l].ival);
p += get_srv(r)->name_len;
*(p++) = 0;
}
Hi Alex,
did you receive any provisional reply from UAS before the timeout event?
No, the failing node was inserted for testing purposes. It has nothing
listening on that port.
I'm a bit worried about this line:
Apr 13 14:54:32 sip1 outbound1[17834]: DEBUG:do_srv_lookup:
SRV(_sip._udp.outbounds.domain.net) = out_sip1.domain.net:5060
shouldn't it mention both hosts?
6217
days inactive
6301
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alex Hermann -
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Christian Schlatter -
Klaus Darilion