Hello list. Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261 Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
Thanks Regards, Ricardo.-
Yes, take a look at section 7.3.1.
"It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header field rows into one “field-name: fieldvalue” pair, without changing the semantics of the message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each separated by a comma."
Andres
Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello list. Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP__ 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP__ 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
Thanks Regards, Ricardo.-
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:13:17, rmartinez wrote about "[Serusers] Via Format?":
Hello list. Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
Yes, multiple values can be grouped in one header, but the first Via value lacks branch; it's real violation of RFC3261. (Seems it is allowed by RFC2543, but 2543 is rather obsoleted)
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
Hello Valentin. Thanks for your answer. So, according to your comment the correct format should be something like this ? : Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060;branch=z9hG4bK-aef982198ef98a981 , SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
????? Thanks again! Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Valentin Nechayev [mailto:netch@portaone.com] Enviado el: martes, 29 de agosto de 2006 1:28 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Via Format?
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:13:17, rmartinez wrote about "[Serusers] Via Format?":
Hello list. Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
Yes, multiple values can be grouped in one header, but the first Via value lacks branch; it's real violation of RFC3261. (Seems it is allowed by RFC2543, but 2543 is rather obsoleted)
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
-
Andres -
Ricardo Martinez -
Valentin Nechayev