28 Aug
2006
28 Aug
'06
11:13 p.m.
Hello list.
Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP
69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
Thanks
Regards,
Ricardo.-
29 Aug
29 Aug
5:51 a.m.
Yes, take a look at section 7.3.1.
"It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header field rows into one
“field-name: fieldvalue”
pair, without changing the semantics of the message, by appending each
subsequent field-value to the
first, each separated by a comma."
Andres
Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello list.
Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the
RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP__ 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP__
69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
Thanks
Regards,
Ricardo.-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Andres
Technical Support
http://www.telesip.net
7:27 a.m.
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:13:17, rmartinez wrote about "[Serusers] Via Format?":
Hello list.
Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP
69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
Yes, multiple values can be grouped in one header, but the first
Via value lacks branch; it's real violation of RFC3261. (Seems it
is allowed by RFC2543, but 2543 is rather obsoleted)
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
--
Valentin Nechayev
PortaOne Inc., Software Engineer
mailto:netch@portaone.com
5:38 p.m.
Hello Valentin.
Thanks for your answer.
So, according to your comment the correct format should be something like this ? :
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060;branch=z9hG4bK-aef982198ef98a981 , SIP/2.0/UDP
69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
?????
Thanks again!
Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Valentin Nechayev [mailto:netch@portaone.com]
Enviado el: martes, 29 de agosto de 2006 1:28
Para: Ricardo Martinez
CC: serusers(a)iptel.org
Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Via Format?
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:13:17, rmartinez wrote about "[Serusers] Via Format?":
Hello list.
Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP
69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
Yes, multiple values can be grouped in one header, but the first
Via value lacks branch; it's real violation of RFC3261. (Seems it
is allowed by RFC2543, but 2543 is rather obsoleted)
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...
--
Valentin Nechayev
PortaOne Inc., Software Engineer
mailto:netch@portaone.com
6641
days inactive
6642
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andres -
Ricardo Martinez -
Valentin Nechayev