hi!
When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius has the following shape: Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 Packet-Type = Access-Request User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. so do I understand right that radius in such case should be configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs?
Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put into the particular track and class?
Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
Thank you in advance Best Tomasz
tzieleniewski wrote:
hi!
When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius has the following shape: Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 Packet-Type = Access-Request User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. so do I understand right that radius in such case should be configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs?
That's correct.
Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put into the particular track and class?
No prefixes.
Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value
Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer avp. It is the responsibility of the RADIUS server to return the correct set of AVP dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser). g-)
Thank you in advance Best Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
tzieleniewski wrote:
hi!
When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius has the following shape: Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 Packet-Type = Access-Request User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. so do I understand right that radius in such case should be configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs?
That's correct.
Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put into the particular track and class?
No prefixes.
Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value
Hi,
I did it and connection with radius works fine - I see the Access-Request from ser being analyzed and answered by radius but I can see an avp value to appear in ser. I did such a check:
dump_attrs(); radius_load_attrs("$tr","@ruri"); dump_attrs();
the following message arived at radius: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "tomix" SER-DID = "tezet.no-ip.org" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
and following one was answered: Sending Access-Accept of id 85 to 127.0.0.1 port 32997 SER-To-DID = "domain.any"
the ser debug output haven't show any change related to did avp in to track, why is that, what do I missed?
debug output: Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]="tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: route[INBOUND]: radius_load_attrs($tr,@ruri) <ACK> sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]="tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Bests Tomasz
Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer avp. It is the responsibility of the RADIUS server to return the correct set of AVP dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser). g-)
Thank you in advance Best Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi
Is this correct that when I send the Get-URI-Attrs request type to radius it has the following contents: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "hellboy" SER-DID = "voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 and when I send the Get-User_Attrs the contents are the following: User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
shouldn't here be the same split into the User-Name and SER-DID? Such form implies to have double records in radius for sip:hellboy and hellboy.
Bests Tomasz
tzieleniewski wrote:
hi!
When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius has the following shape: Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 Packet-Type = Access-Request User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. so do I understand right that radius in such case should be configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs?
That's correct.
Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put into the particular track and class?
No prefixes.
Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value
Hi,
I did it and connection with radius works fine - I see the Access-Request from ser being analyzed and answered by radius but I can see an avp value to appear in ser. I did such a check:
dump_attrs(); radius_load_attrs("$tr","@ruri"); dump_attrs();
the following message arived at radius: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "tomix" SER-DID = "tezet.no-ip.org" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
and following one was answered: Sending Access-Accept of id 85 to 127.0.0.1 port 32997 SER-To-DID = "domain.any"
the ser debug output haven't show any change related to did avp in to track, why is that, what do I missed?
debug output: Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]="tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: route[INBOUND]: radius_load_attrs($tr,@ruri) <ACK> sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]="tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Bests Tomasz
Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer avp. It is the responsibility of the RADIUS server to return the correct set of AVP dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser). g-)
Thank you in advance Best Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi all,
Sorry for stepping so late in this post but I am facing exactly the same "issue" and would like to call for attention from other SER 2.0 rc2 users/developers.
Whenever you try to load from RADIUS user class attributes, for example with
radius_load_attr("$tu","@to.uri") you get in radius only User-Name = "sip:sam@test.voip.com" SER-Service-Type=Get-User-Attrs.
In case you want to load uri class attributes, for example with radius_load_attr("$tr","@to.uri") the Radius Request paquet has completely different contents, namely the URI splited into 3 parameters SER-URI-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "sam" SER-DID = "test.voip.com"
This double format complicates unnecessarily, at least for me, radius configuration or forces you to do some "dirty", at least for me, tricks in order to get in the User-Name paramenter the same value so you onlyhave ONE USER DEFINITION in radius config and not all the possible combinations it may appear...Remember you can call load_user_attr with different arguments (@ruri,@to,@to.uri,@to.uri,username,....) and it will end up being a complete mess.
I would therefore like to standardize both methods so the same data is expected in radius or that someone explain why this different methods are required.
Thanks to all!!!
Samuel.
P.D. I'm a radius newbie, using FreeRadius, and may be there are clean ways to configure RADIUS so both Access-Requests are handled in a ellegant way requiring you to have only one user definition.
2007/3/12, tzieleniewski tzieleniewski@o2.pl:
Hi
Is this correct that when I send the Get-URI-Attrs request type to radius it has the following contents: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "hellboy" SER-DID = "voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 and when I send the Get-User_Attrs the contents are the following: User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
shouldn't here be the same split into the User-Name and SER-DID? Such form implies to have double records in radius for sip:hellboy and hellboy.
Bests Tomasz
tzieleniewski wrote:
hi!
When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius has
the following shape:
Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 Packet-Type = Access-Request User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. so do I understand right that radius in such case should be
configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs?
That's correct.
Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put
into the particular track and class?
No prefixes.
Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record
and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value
Hi,
I did it and connection with radius works fine - I see the
Access-Request from ser being analyzed and answered by radius but I can see an avp value to appear in ser.
I did such a check:
dump_attrs(); radius_load_attrs("$tr","@ruri"); dump_attrs();
the following message arived at radius: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "tomix" SER-DID = "tezet.no-ip.org" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
and following one was answered: Sending Access-Accept of id 85 to 127.0.0.1 port 32997 SER-To-DID = "domain.any"
the ser debug output haven't show any change related to did avp in to
track, why is that, what do I missed?
debug output: Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]="tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: route[INBOUND]:
radius_load_attrs($tr,@ruri) <ACK> sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]="tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Bests Tomasz
Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer
avp.
It is the responsibility of the RADIUS server to return the correct
set
of AVP dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser). g-)
Thank you in advance Best Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Please register as 2.0 issue on http://tracker.iptel.org/ g-)
samuel wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for stepping so late in this post but I am facing exactly the same "issue" and would like to call for attention from other SER 2.0 rc2 users/developers.
Whenever you try to load from RADIUS user class attributes, for example with radius_load_attr("$tu","@to.uri") you get in radius only User-Name = "sip:sam@test.voip.com mailto:sip:sam@test.voip.com" SER-Service-Type=Get-User-Attrs.
In case you want to load uri class attributes, for example with radius_load_attr("$tr","@to.uri") the Radius Request paquet has completely different contents, namely the URI splited into 3 parameters SER-URI-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "sam" SER-DID = "test.voip.com http://test.voip.com"
This double format complicates unnecessarily, at least for me, radius configuration or forces you to do some "dirty", at least for me, tricks in order to get in the User-Name paramenter the same value so you onlyhave ONE USER DEFINITION in radius config and not all the possible combinations it may appear...Remember you can call load_user_attr with different arguments (@ruri,@to,@ to.uri,@to.uri,username,....) and it will end up being a complete mess.
I would therefore like to standardize both methods so the same data is expected in radius or that someone explain why this different methods are required.
Thanks to all!!!
Samuel.
P.D. I'm a radius newbie, using FreeRadius, and may be there are clean ways to configure RADIUS so both Access-Requests are handled in a ellegant way requiring you to have only one user definition.
2007/3/12, tzieleniewski <tzieleniewski@o2.pl mailto:tzieleniewski@o2.pl>:
Hi Is this correct that when I send the Get-URI-Attrs request type to radius it has the following contents: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "hellboy" SER-DID = " voip.rd.touk.pl <http://voip.rd.touk.pl>" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1> and when I send the Get-User_Attrs the contents are the following: User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl <mailto:sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl>" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1> shouldn't here be the same split into the User-Name and SER-DID? Such form implies to have double records in radius for sip:hellboy and hellboy. Bests Tomasz > > > > tzieleniewski wrote: > > > hi! > > > > > > When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius has the following shape: > > > Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 > > > Packet-Type = Access-Request > > > User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl <mailto:sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl>" > > > SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs > > > NAS-Port = 0 > > > NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1> > > > > > > the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. > > > so do I understand right that radius in such case should be configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs? > > > > > That's correct. > > > Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put into the particular track and class? > > > > > No prefixes. > > > Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading. > > > > > SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value > Hi, > > I did it and connection with radius works fine - I see the Access-Request from ser being analyzed and answered by radius but I can see an avp value to appear in ser. > I did such a check: > > dump_attrs(); > radius_load_attrs("$tr","@ruri"); > dump_attrs(); > > the following message arived at radius: > SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" > User-Name = "tomix" > SER-DID = "tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs > NAS-Port = 0 > NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1> > > and following one was answered: > Sending Access-Accept of id 85 to 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1> port 32997 > SER-To-DID = "domain.any" > > the ser debug output haven't show any change related to did avp in to track, why is that, what do I missed? > > debug output: > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM class=DOMAIN > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix@tezet.no-ip.org <mailto:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org <mailto:sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: route[INBOUND]: radius_load_attrs($tr,@ruri) <ACK> < sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org <mailto:sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org>> > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM class=DOMAIN > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO class=DOMAIN > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org <http://tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM class=USER > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix@tezet.no-ip.org <mailto:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org>" > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI > Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org <mailto:sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org>" > > Bests > Tomasz > > > > > > Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer avp. > > It is the responsibility of the RADIUS server to return the correct set > > of AVP dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser). > > g-) > > > Thank you in advance > > > Best > > > Tomasz > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > Serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org> > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I'm not sure whether this functionality has been done in purpouse. I would like the coder who made it to explain the reason why it is different and only in the case there's no special reason, track it.
Samuel.
2007/6/7, Greger V. Teigre greger@teigre.com:
Please register as 2.0 issue on http://tracker.iptel.org/ g-)
samuel wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for stepping so late in this post but I am facing exactly the same "issue" and would like to call for attention from other SER 2.0 rc2 users/developers.
Whenever you try to load from RADIUS user class attributes, for example with radius_load_attr("$tu","@to.uri") you get in radius only User-Name = "sip:sam@test.voip.com" SER-Service-Type=Get-User-Attrs.
In case you want to load uri class attributes, for example with radius_load_attr("$tr","@to.uri") the Radius Request paquet has completely different contents, namely the URI splited into 3 parameters SER-URI-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "sam" SER-DID = "test.voip.com"
This double format complicates unnecessarily, at least for me, radius configuration or forces you to do some "dirty", at least for me, tricks in order to get in the User-Name paramenter the same value so you onlyhave ONE USER DEFINITION in radius config and not all the possible combinations it may appear...Remember you can call load_user_attr with different arguments (@ruri,@to,@ to.uri,@to.uri,username,....) and it will end up being a complete mess.
I would therefore like to standardize both methods so the same data is expected in radius or that someone explain why this different methods are required.
Thanks to all!!!
Samuel.
P.D. I'm a radius newbie, using FreeRadius, and may be there are clean ways to configure RADIUS so both Access-Requests are handled in a ellegant way requiring you to have only one user definition.
2007/3/12, tzieleniewski tzieleniewski@o2.pl:
Hi
Is this correct that when I send the Get-URI-Attrs request type to radius it has the following contents: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "hellboy" SER-DID = " voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 and when I send the Get-User_Attrs the contents are the following: User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
shouldn't here be the same split into the User-Name and SER-DID? Such form implies to have double records in radius for sip:hellboy and hellboy.
Bests Tomasz
tzieleniewski wrote:
hi!
When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius
has the following shape:
Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 Packet-Type = Access-Request User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. so do I understand right that radius in such case should be
configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs?
That's correct.
Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put
into the particular track and class?
No prefixes.
Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record
and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value
Hi,
I did it and connection with radius works fine - I see the
Access-Request from ser being analyzed and answered by radius but I can see an avp value to appear in ser.
I did such a check:
dump_attrs(); radius_load_attrs("$tr","@ruri"); dump_attrs();
the following message arived at radius: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "tomix" SER-DID = "tezet.no-ip.org" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
and following one was answered: Sending Access-Accept of id 85 to 127.0.0.1 port 32997 SER-To-DID = "domain.any"
the ser debug output haven't show any change related to did avp in to
track, why is that, what do I missed?
debug output: Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org
"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM
class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: route[INBOUND]:
radius_load_attrs($tr,@ruri) <ACK> < sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org>
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org
"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM
class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Bests Tomasz
Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer
avp.
It is the responsibility of the RADIUS server to return the correct
set
of AVP dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser). g-)
Thank you in advance Best Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.orghttp://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Yes, and the best way to do that is to register it ;-)
------- Original message ------- From: samuel samu60@gmail.com Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: 7.6.'07, 11:02
I'm not sure whether this functionality has been done in purpouse. I would like the coder who made it to explain the reason why it is different and only in the case there's no special reason, track it.
Samuel.
2007/6/7, Greger V. Teigre greger@teigre.com:
Please register as 2.0 issue on http://tracker.iptel.org/ g-)
samuel wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for stepping so late in this post but I am facing exactly the same "issue" and would like to call for attention from other SER 2.0 rc2 users/developers.
Whenever you try to load from RADIUS user class attributes, for example with radius_load_attr("$tu","@to.uri") you get in radius only User-Name = "sip:sam@test.voip.com" SER-Service-Type=Get-User-Attrs.
In case you want to load uri class attributes, for example with radius_load_attr("$tr","@to.uri") the Radius Request paquet has completely different contents, namely the URI splited into 3 parameters SER-URI-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "sam" SER-DID = "test.voip.com"
This double format complicates unnecessarily, at least for me, radius configuration or forces you to do some "dirty", at least for me, tricks in order to get in the User-Name paramenter the same value so you onlyhave ONE USER DEFINITION in radius config and not all the possible combinations it may appear...Remember you can call load_user_attr with different arguments (@ruri,@to,@ to.uri,@to.uri,username,....) and it will end up being a complete mess.
I would therefore like to standardize both methods so the same data is expected in radius or that someone explain why this different methods are required.
Thanks to all!!!
Samuel.
P.D. I'm a radius newbie, using FreeRadius, and may be there are clean ways to configure RADIUS so both Access-Requests are handled in a ellegant way requiring you to have only one user definition.
2007/3/12, tzieleniewski tzieleniewski@o2.pl:
Hi
Is this correct that when I send the Get-URI-Attrs request type to radius it has the following contents: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "hellboy" SER-DID = " voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 and when I send the Get-User_Attrs the contents are the following: User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
shouldn't here be the same split into the User-Name and SER-DID? Such form implies to have double records in radius for sip:hellboy and hellboy.
Bests Tomasz
tzieleniewski wrote:
hi!
When I invoke the radius_load_attrs() the message send to radius
has the following shape:
Thu Mar 8 10:50:46 2007 Packet-Type = Access-Request User-Name = "sip:hellboy@voip.rd.touk.pl" SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
the message doesn't contain any authentication data like password. so do I understand right that radius in such case should be
configured in such a way to accept any message of the SER-Service-Type = Get-User-Attrs?
That's correct.
Are still the avp loaded from radius prefixed or they are just put
into the particular track and class?
No prefixes.
Could You please give me one example of the radius one avp record
and the shape in which it will appear in ser after loading.
SER-Attr -> avp[:=]value
Hi,
I did it and connection with radius works fine - I see the
Access-Request from ser being analyzed and answered by radius but I can see an avp value to appear in ser.
I did such a check:
dump_attrs(); radius_load_attrs("$tr","@ruri"); dump_attrs();
the following message arived at radius: SER-Uri-Scheme = "sip" User-Name = "tomix" SER-DID = "tezet.no-ip.org" SER-Service-Type = Get-URI-Attrs NAS-Port = 0 NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1
and following one was answered: Sending Access-Accept of id 85 to 127.0.0.1 port 32997 SER-To-DID = "domain.any"
the ser debug output haven't show any change related to did avp in to
track, why is that, what do I missed?
debug output: Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org
"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM
class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: route[INBOUND]:
radius_load_attrs($tr,@ruri) <ACK> < sip:tomix@tezet.no-ip.org>
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:540: class=GLOBAL Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["lang"]="en" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:550: track=FROM
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]=" tezet.no-ip.org
"
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:560: track=TO
class=DOMAIN
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["did"]=" tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["digest_realm"]="tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:570: track=FROM
class=USER
Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:580: track=TO class=USER Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["uid"]=" tomix@tezet.no-ip.org" Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c:590: track=FROM class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: No AVP present Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: INFO: avp.c :600: track=TO class=URI Mar 9 10:47:50 tomix ser[3721]: AVP["fforward_failure"]="
sip:misia@tezet.no-ip.org"
Bests Tomasz
Integer values are automatically converted from string into integer
avp.
It is the responsibility of the RADIUS server to return the correct
set
of AVP dependent on SER-Service-Type (see etc/dictionary.ser). g-)
Thank you in advance Best Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.orghttp://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
This is partially downloaded message. Choose 'Download' from menu to download entire message.
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Greger Viken Teigre
-
samuel -
tzieleniewski