2 Jul
2005
2 Jul
'05
1:02 p.m.
Has any one tried extending SER to load ser.cfg entries from database.
My thought is that it would be really cool to put a web interface over
SER to manage config entries. Any thoughts?
- Daryl
3 Jul
3 Jul
12:47 p.m.
Daryl,
This is a matter of personal preference, but I'd say that the
configuration options for functions like lookup() and proxy_authorize()
are flexible enough that a dynamic ser.cfg is unnecessary. For
particularly complex routing, or to access database systems that SER
doesn't support natively, exec_dset() is very useful.
Of course, an equivalent of mod_perl's Apache::Registry for SER would be
fantastic.
Alistair Cunningham,
Integrics Ltd,
+44 (0)7870 699 479
http://integrics.com/
Daryl Sanders wrote:
Has any one tried extending SER to load ser.cfg
entries from database.
My thought is that it would be really cool to put a web interface over
SER to manage config entries. Any thoughts?
- Daryl
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6902
days inactive
6903
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alistair Cunningham -
Daryl Sanders