Hi Samuel, I met the same problem, so I'm using now something like: if ((!(a)to.tag) || (@to.tag=="")) { ... } It seemed to be working this way. Vaclav On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:53:43PM +0200, samuel wrote: work. another anyone

just tested and the option you said works like charm. thanks Vaclav! Samuel. 2007/6/7, samuel <samu60(a)gmail.com>om>: > >Michal just posted in serdev a bug that might be related to this...I asked >if they are related. >samuel. > >2007/6/7, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart(a)iptel.org >: >> >> Hi Samuel, >> I met the same problem, so I'm using now something like: >> >> if ((!(a)to.tag) || (@to.tag=="")) { >> ... >> } >> >> It seemed to be working this way. >> >> Vaclav >> >> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:53:43PM +0200, samuel wrote: >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > I am moving production to SER2 rc 2.0 and can not make @to.tag=="" to >> work. >> > >> > For example, in initial INVITEs: >> > >> > # if this is an initial INVITE (without a To-tag) we might try >> another >> > # (forwarding or voicemail) target after receiving an error >> > if (method=="INVITE" && @to.tag=="") { >> > xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: initial INVITE (no Totag) setting >> > FAILURE_ROUTE"); >> > t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); >> > } >> > >> > FAILURE_ROUTE is never called. >> > >> > While next check works (in the sense the failure route is processed). >> > >> > if (method=="INVITE") { >> > xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: INVITE setting FAILURE_ROUTE"); >> > t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); >> > } >> > >> > >> > So I am wondering whether @to.tag=="" works for empty To tag....can >> anyone >> > confirm it? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Samuel. >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Serusers mailing list >> > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >