Hi folks,
I am moving production to SER2 rc 2.0 and can not make @to.tag=="" to work.
For example, in initial INVITEs:
# if this is an initial INVITE (without a To-tag) we might try another # (forwarding or voicemail) target after receiving an error if (method=="INVITE" && @to.tag=="") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: initial INVITE (no Totag) setting FAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }
FAILURE_ROUTE is never called.
While next check works (in the sense the failure route is processed).
if (method=="INVITE") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: INVITE setting FAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }
So I am wondering whether @to.tag=="" works for empty To tag....can anyone confirm it?
Thanks, Samuel.
Hi Samuel, I met the same problem, so I'm using now something like:
if ((!@to.tag) || (@to.tag=="")) { ... }
It seemed to be working this way.
Vaclav
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:53:43PM +0200, samuel wrote:
Hi folks,
I am moving production to SER2 rc 2.0 and can not make @to.tag=="" to work.
For example, in initial INVITEs:
# if this is an initial INVITE (without a To-tag) we might try another # (forwarding or voicemail) target after receiving an error if (method=="INVITE" && @to.tag=="") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: initial INVITE (no Totag) settingFAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }
FAILURE_ROUTE is never called.
While next check works (in the sense the failure route is processed).
if (method=="INVITE") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: INVITE setting FAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }So I am wondering whether @to.tag=="" works for empty To tag....can anyone confirm it?
Thanks, Samuel.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Michal just posted in serdev a bug that might be related to this...I asked if they are related. samuel.
2007/6/7, Vaclav Kubart vaclav.kubart@iptel.org:
Hi Samuel, I met the same problem, so I'm using now something like:
if ((!@to.tag) || (@to.tag=="")) { ... }
It seemed to be working this way.
VaclavOn Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:53:43PM +0200, samuel wrote:
Hi folks,
I am moving production to SER2 rc 2.0 and can not make @to.tag=="" to
work.
For example, in initial INVITEs:
# if this is an initial INVITE (without a To-tag) we might tryanother
# (forwarding or voicemail) target after receiving an error if (method=="INVITE" && @to.tag=="") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: initial INVITE (no Totag) settingFAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }
FAILURE_ROUTE is never called.
While next check works (in the sense the failure route is processed).
if (method=="INVITE") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: INVITE setting FAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }So I am wondering whether @to.tag=="" works for empty To tag....can
anyone
confirm it?
Thanks, Samuel.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
just tested and the option you said works like charm.
thanks Vaclav! Samuel.
2007/6/7, samuel samu60@gmail.com:
Michal just posted in serdev a bug that might be related to this...I asked if they are related. samuel.
2007/6/7, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart@iptel.org >:
Hi Samuel, I met the same problem, so I'm using now something like:
if ((!@to.tag) || (@to.tag=="")) { ... }
It seemed to be working this way.
VaclavOn Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:53:43PM +0200, samuel wrote:
Hi folks,
I am moving production to SER2 rc 2.0 and can not make @to.tag=="" to
work.
For example, in initial INVITEs:
# if this is an initial INVITE (without a To-tag) we might tryanother
# (forwarding or voicemail) target after receiving an error if (method=="INVITE" && @to.tag=="") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: initial INVITE (no Totag) settingFAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }
FAILURE_ROUTE is never called.
While next check works (in the sense the failure route is processed).
if (method=="INVITE") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: INVITE setting FAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }So I am wondering whether @to.tag=="" works for empty To tag....can
anyone
confirm it?
Thanks, Samuel.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
:-) You are welcome - but it is only a workaround. I guess that it will be related to that Michal's bug and solving it could help.
Vaclav
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:02:15PM +0200, samuel wrote:
just tested and the option you said works like charm.
thanks Vaclav! Samuel.
2007/6/7, samuel samu60@gmail.com:
Michal just posted in serdev a bug that might be related to this...I asked if they are related. samuel.
2007/6/7, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart@iptel.org >:
Hi Samuel, I met the same problem, so I'm using now something like:
if ((!@to.tag) || (@to.tag=="")) { ... }
It seemed to be working this way.
VaclavOn Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:53:43PM +0200, samuel wrote:
Hi folks,
I am moving production to SER2 rc 2.0 and can not make @to.tag=="" to
work.
For example, in initial INVITEs:
# if this is an initial INVITE (without a To-tag) we might tryanother
# (forwarding or voicemail) target after receiving an error if (method=="INVITE" && @to.tag=="") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: initial INVITE (no Totag) settingFAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }
FAILURE_ROUTE is never called.
While next check works (in the sense the failure route is processed).
if (method=="INVITE") { xlog("L_ERR","LXLOG: INVITE setting FAILURE_ROUTE"); t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE"); }So I am wondering whether @to.tag=="" works for empty To tag....can
anyone
confirm it?
Thanks, Samuel.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
samuel -
Vaclav Kubart