[OpenSER-Users] "480 User not responding" instead of "408 Request Timeout" when modparam("tm", "noisy_ctimer", 1)?
23 Oct
2007
23 Oct
'07
6:29 a.m.
Hi, if modparam("tm", "noisy_ctimer", 1) and INVITE exceded
"fr_inv_timer"
then OpenSer sends "408 Request Timeout" to caller and CANCEL to called.
I'm sure this is correct according to RFC, but wouldn't be better replying
with "480 User not responding"?
For example, Asterisk does nothing if it receives "408 Request Timeout" (it
ignores it). I've reported about about it:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11058
Sure it's a fail of Asterisk who shoud accept "408" and terminate the call,
but anyway, wouldn't be correct to reply with "480" instead of
"408"?
Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
23 Oct
23 Oct
6:36 a.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
Sure it's a fail of Asterisk who shoud accept
"408" and terminate the call,
but anyway, wouldn't be correct to reply with "480" instead of
"408"?
480 is "temporarily unavailable", and it is returned if the requested
sip ua is not currently online, i.e., has not registered itself and
there is thus no contact to try.
-- juha
6:49 a.m.
El Martes, 23 de Octubre de 2007, Juha Heinanen escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
Yes, you are right, Asterisk confused me since means 480 as "480 User not
responding" that sounds Ok but is not the real definition.
In this case the only solution is hoping Asterisk developers fix it.
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
Sure it's a fail of Asterisk who shoud accept
"408" and terminate the
call, but anyway, wouldn't be correct to reply with "480" instead of
"408"?
480 is "temporarily unavailable", and it is returned if the requested
sip ua is not currently online, i.e., has not registered itself and
there is thus no contact to try.
6100
days inactive
6100
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
jh＠tutpro.com