Hi,
I downloaded SER yesterday and I am trying to run it as a UAS.
I am using the sample configuration uas.cfg. I modified it so that on receiving an INVITE I send a 200 OK. Now the problem is when I use the t_reply command to send the 200 OK, it doesn't add any SDP part to it.
Is there anyway an SDP can be added to the 200 OK response to the INVITE.
Appreciate any help Viji
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
At 10:39 PM 1/7/2003, Viji Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded SER yesterday
Congratulation to having chosen to use the fastest, most flexible and beautiful SIP server ever :-)
and I am trying to run it as a UAS.
I am using the sample configuration uas.cfg. I modified it so that on receiving an INVITE I send a 200 OK. Now the problem is when I use the t_reply command to send the 200 OK, it doesn't add any SDP part to it.
Is there anyway an SDP can be added to the 200 OK response to the INVITE.
No. The reason is we have not tried to bind ser to applications yet (and adding application payload without an application is little useful).
We are now in the process of adding support for coupling ser with external applications, like media player. In such scenarios, ser will pass signaling to the apps, and the apps will have absolute freedom to tell ser via an IPC channel how the reply should look like.
Is that what you are looking for?
-Jiri
Hi,
I have one more question. What is the performance of the "ser" incomparison to call handling using ISUP. Is there a factor for assuming that if the performance for ISUP is 100 cps then for SIP the performance would be divided by 2 and that the maximum calls that can be supported by "ser" would be 50.
Are there any performance comparisons done between ISUP and SIP.
Thanks again.
--- Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org wrote:
At 10:39 PM 1/7/2003, Viji Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded SER yesterday
Congratulation to having chosen to use the fastest, most flexible and beautiful SIP server ever :-)
and I am trying to run it as a UAS.
I am using the sample configuration uas.cfg. I modified it so that on receiving an INVITE I send a 200 OK. Now the problem is when I use the t_reply command to send the 200 OK, it doesn't add any SDP part to it.
Is there anyway an SDP can be added to the 200 OK response to the INVITE.
No. The reason is we have not tried to bind ser to applications yet (and adding application payload without an application is little useful).
We are now in the process of adding support for coupling ser with external applications, like media player. In such scenarios, ser will pass signaling to the apps, and the apps will have absolute freedom to tell ser via an IPC channel how the reply should look like.
Is that what you are looking for?
-Jiri
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
At 11:27 PM 1/9/2003, Viji Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I have one more question. What is the performance of the "ser" incomparison to call handling using ISUP.
I do not know about documents about performance achieavable by existing ISUP implementations.
Is there a factor for assuming that if the performance for ISUP is 100 cps then for SIP the performance would be divided by 2 and that the maximum calls that can be supported by "ser" would be 50.
I don't understand how performance of SER could depend on peformance of some other unrelated device. Also, you wish to compare peformance, you need to refer to products (SER, Southern Telecom's SS7 superswitch, etc.) rather than to protocol specificitations (SIP, ISUP). SIP specification cannot have 50 cps -- that's simply not a valid measure for a protocol spec. A broken sip implementation can have 50 cps, of course. I heard of some that did.
-Jiri
-
Jiri Kuthan -
Viji Krishnan