7 Jan
2003
7 Jan
'03
11:39 p.m.
Hi,
I downloaded SER yesterday and I am trying to
run it as a UAS.
I am using the sample configuration uas.cfg.
I modified it so that on receiving an INVITE
I send a 200 OK. Now the problem is when I
use the t_reply command to send the 200 OK,
it doesn't add any SDP part to it.
Is there anyway an SDP can be added to the
200 OK response to the INVITE.
Appreciate any help
Viji
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
8 Jan
8 Jan
12:23 a.m.
At 10:39 PM 1/7/2003, Viji Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded SER yesterday
Congratulation to having chosen to use the fastest, most
flexible and beautiful SIP server ever :-)
and I am trying to
run it as a UAS.
I am using the sample configuration uas.cfg.
I modified it so that on receiving an INVITE
I send a 200 OK. Now the problem is when I
use the t_reply command to send the 200 OK,
it doesn't add any SDP part to it.
Is there anyway an SDP can be added to the
200 OK response to the INVITE.
No. The reason is we have not tried to bind ser to
applications yet (and adding application payload
without an application is little useful).
We are now in the process of adding support for
coupling ser with external applications, like
media player. In such scenarios, ser will pass
signaling to the apps, and the apps will have
absolute freedom to tell ser via an IPC channel
how the reply should look like.
Is that what you are looking for?
-Jiri
10 Jan
10 Jan
12:27 a.m.
Hi,
I have one more question.
What is the performance of the "ser"
incomparison to call handling using ISUP.
Is there a factor for assuming that if
the performance for ISUP is 100 cps then
for SIP the performance would be divided
by 2 and that the maximum calls that can be
supported by "ser" would be 50.
Are there any performance comparisons done
between ISUP and SIP.
Thanks again.
--- Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote:
At 10:39 PM 1/7/2003, Viji Krishnan wrote:
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Hi,
I downloaded SER yesterday
Congratulation to having chosen to use the fastest,
most
flexible and beautiful SIP server ever :-)
and I am trying to
run it as a UAS.
I am using the sample configuration uas.cfg.
I modified it so that on receiving an INVITE
I send a 200 OK. Now the problem is when I
use the t_reply command to send the 200 OK,
it doesn't add any SDP part to it.
Is there anyway an SDP can be added to the
200 OK response to the INVITE.
No. The reason is we have not tried to bind ser to
applications yet (and adding application payload
without an application is little useful).
We are now in the process of adding support for
coupling ser with external applications, like
media player. In such scenarios, ser will pass
signaling to the apps, and the apps will have
absolute freedom to tell ser via an IPC channel
how the reply should look like.
Is that what you are looking for?
-Jiri
2:04 a.m.
At 11:27 PM 1/9/2003, Viji Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
I have one more question.
What is the performance of the "ser"
incomparison to call handling using ISUP.
I do not know about documents about performance achieavable by
existing ISUP implementations.
Is there a factor for assuming that if
the performance for ISUP is 100 cps then
for SIP the performance would be divided
by 2 and that the maximum calls that can be
supported by "ser" would be 50.
I don't understand how performance of SER could depend on
peformance of some other unrelated device. Also, you wish
to compare peformance, you need to refer to products
(SER, Southern Telecom's SS7 superswitch, etc.) rather than
to protocol specificitations (SIP, ISUP). SIP specification
cannot have 50 cps -- that's simply not a valid measure for
a protocol spec. A broken sip implementation can have 50 cps,
of course. I heard of some that did.
-Jiri
8018
days inactive
8021
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jiri Kuthan -
Viji Krishnan