Daniel, Yes, it is. alias=... Also tried with listen = IP advertise FQDN same behavior, loose_route() stops acting correctly. PS: Forgot to add, Kamailio 5.4.3 / 5.4.4 Regards, Igor On 07.05.2021 13:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Hello, > > is the KAMAILIO_FQDN set as local domain for Kamailio (via alias > parameter or domain module+register myself)? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 07.05.21 11:17, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I saw there are some topics on this already and carefully walked >> through all of them, but can't solve following issue. >> >> For a reason I do need that in Record-Route header sent to endpoint >> would present FQDN. If it matters, it's UDP/WSS conversion done on >> Kamailio. >> >> So, scheme is quite simple >> >> Enpoint A  ->UDP-> Kamailio ->WSS-> Endpoint B (NAT) >> >> Main issue here, that if in Record-Route headers it's FQDN, but not >> IP addresses, on a new transactions with a dialog (ACK on 200, >> PRACK, BYE), Kamailio*loose_route()* function resolves address of >> destination not current dialog, but actual R-URI (or itself, if >> R-URI is something from WebRTC world) that is not correct due to NAT. >> >> If in RR headers IP addresses are present - all is working as expected. >> >> As an example (RR with FQDN) >> >> B answers 200 >> >> SIP/2.0 200 OK >> Record-Route: >> <sip:KAMAILIO_FQDN:8089;transport=ws;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >> Record-Route: >> <sip:KAMAILIO_FQDN;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP <A_IP_ADDRESS>:5060;received=A IP >> ADDRESS;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKPj67fb6d86-97d7-4231-995b-e54b0f62881e >> To: <sip:88290@<KAMAILIO_FQDN>>;tag=hvra7mj3q0 >> From: >> <sip:+XXXX7688881@<KAMAILIO_FQDN>>;tag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d >> Call-ID: 46f44741-d155-4dd5-8fd8-78e540fc1acb >> CSeq: 18326 INVITE >> Contact: <sip:88290@toleivu2gdbh.invalid;transport=wss> >> Allow: ACK,CANCEL,INVITE,MESSAGE,BYE,OPTIONS,INFO,NOTIFY,REFER >> Supported: outbound >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 817 >> >> >> ACK looks like >> >> ACK sip:88290@toleivu2gdbh.invalid;transport=wss SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> A_IP_ADDRESS:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj8d05548a-91ef-4332-8617-32f8eeebf8f2 >> From: <sip:88881@A_IP_ADDRESS>;tag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d >> To: <sip:88290@KAMAILIO_FQDN>;tag=hvra7mj3q0 >> Call-ID: 46f44741-d155-4dd5-8fd8-78e540fc1acb >> CSeq: 18326 ACK >> Route: >> <sip:FQDN;lr;r2=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >> Route: >> <sip:FQDN:8089;transport=ws;lr;r2=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 13.33.0 >> Content-Length:  0 >> >> And Kamailio on *loose_route()* loops ACK to itself. (with result of >> function == 1) >> >> In a case if in Record-Route/Route headers just IP address of >> Kamailio present, all works as expected, but it's not really >> behavior I want to achieve. >> >> I've tried to play with *record_route_preset("...")* specifying only >> WSS part (as suggested in >> https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams) with FQDN, but no luck. >> >> Also wanted to try approach using record_route_preset() function in >> branch route, but it was working only with first branch, not >> affecting others (but I assume having different RR headers across >> branches is not a good idea) >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Igor >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> *sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> *https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com > www.twitter.com/miconda --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training - Online > May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) > *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/

Can you paste the ACK that loops, after being handled once by Kamailio? Cheers, Daniel On 07.05.21 13:25, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - Online May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/

This looks like incoming ACK, because there is only one Via header, so it is not what proxy forwards -- that one is relevant to see what headers were consumed and added. Cheers, Daniel On 07.05.21 13:51, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - Online May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/

For incoming SIP replies, it means that top Record-Route URI is 'myself' and source address is not matching it

OK, because looping was something that should not have happened in this case. Then the problem is that you do not do nat-traversal-like processing for websocket/webrtc traffic. You have to use set_contact_alias() + handle_ruri_alias() because the webrtc endpoints do not set "valid" contact addresses. Cheers, Daniel On 07.05.21 14:13, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - Online May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/

Did you add the handle_ruri_alias() as suggested by Daniel? I had something like this where I would get “unable to resolve blah blah blah" and it’s because the RURI is the actual wss “address” which is unresolvable, so executing the function forces kamailio to take the alias instead. On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 13:48, Igor Olhovskiy &lt;igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com <mailto:igorolhovskiy@gmail.com>> wrote: Daniel, Seems to be it's really the case, but with other function With FQDN in RR |is_first_hop()| is not acting correctly for reply. But in Record-Route we have "myself", but *is_first_hop()* returning 0. Thanks! Regards, Igor On 07.05.2021 14:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions   * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:   * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> -- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> phone: +34669448337 __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Have you tried verifying Kamailio actually believes the FQDN is itself? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> phone: +34669448337 On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 4:18 PM Igor Olhovskiy &lt;igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com <mailto:igorolhovskiy@gmail.com>> wrote: David, Yes, I did added it, means it was there, but is_first_hop() was blocking adding it. I think it's some leftovers from default config. So, my conclusion, that is_first_hop() is ok with IP addresses, but not ok with FQDN in route. Although FQDN is added as alias Regards, Igor On 07.05.2021 16:07, David Villasmil wrote: __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions   * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:   * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Can you share a trace? On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 21:12, Igor Olhovskiy &lt;igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: -- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Sergiu, Actually, yes Problem is in order of checking in this function https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/02240711239149e2f5c4890a70ab158d1…         if (((ip = str2ip(&(puri.host))) == NULL)                 && ((ip = str2ip6(&(puri.host))) == NULL)) {             LM_DBG("uri host is not an ip address\n");             return -1;         } So, it's checking if Record-Route is an IP address before actually calling *check_self()* function. I'll add an issue. Regards, Igor On 08.05.2021 02:42, Sergiu Pojoga wrote: > May be related to a previous topic about is_first_hop() and 'myself' > > https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2018-October/103261.html > <https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2018-October/103261.html> > > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:22 PM David Villasmil > &lt;david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com > <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Can you share a trace? > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 21:12, Igor Olhovskiy > &lt;igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com <mailto:igorolhovskiy@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Yes. It passesuri == myself condition on auth. > > Regards, > Igor > > On 07.05.2021 17:32, David Villasmil wrote: >> Have you tried verifying Kamailio actually believes the FQDN >> is itself? >> >> Regards, >> >> David Villasmil >> email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> >> phone: +34669448337 >> >> >> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 4:18 PM Igor Olhovskiy >> &lt;igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com <mailto:igorolhovskiy@gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> >> David, >> >> Yes, I did added it, means it was there, but >> is_first_hop() was blocking adding it. I think it's some >> leftovers from default config. >> >> So, my conclusion, that is_first_hop() is ok with IP >> addresses, but not ok with FQDN in route. Although FQDN >> is added as alias >> >> Regards, >> Igor >> >> On 07.05.2021 16:07, David Villasmil wrote: >>> Did you add the handle_ruri_alias() as suggested by >>> Daniel? I had something like this where I would get >>> “unable to resolve blah blah blah" and it’s because the >>> RURI is the actual wss “address” which is unresolvable, >>> so executing the function forces kamailio to take the >>> alias instead. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 13:48, Igor Olhovskiy >>> &lt;igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com >>> <mailto:igorolhovskiy@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Daniel, >>> >>> Seems to be it's really the case, but with other >>> function >>> >>> With FQDN in RR >>> >>> >>> |is_first_hop()| >>> >>> is not acting correctly for reply. >>> >>>> For incoming SIP replies, it means that top >>>> Record-Route URI is 'myself' and source address is >>>> not matching it >>> But in Record-Route we have "myself", but >>> *is_first_hop()* returning 0. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Igor >>> >>> On 07.05.2021 14:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>>> >>>> OK, because looping was something that should not >>>> have happened in this case. >>>> >>>> Then the problem is that you do not do >>>> nat-traversal-like processing for websocket/webrtc >>>> traffic. You have to use set_contact_alias() + >>>> handle_ruri_alias() because the webrtc endpoints >>>> do not set "valid" contact addresses. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> On 07.05.21 14:13, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ah, no, sorry, I was wrong at this one, >>>>> >>>>> This just is not sent with "unable to resolve >>>>> address toleivu2gdbh.invalid". >>>>> >>>>> Sorry. Looping were something else during my >>>>> tests, this just with *advertise* added >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Igor >>>>> On 07.05.2021 14:02, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This looks like incoming ACK, because there is >>>>>> only one Via header, so it is not what proxy >>>>>> forwards -- that one is relevant to see what >>>>>> headers were consumed and added. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07.05.21 13:51, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: >>>>>>> Sure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ACK >>>>>>> sip:88290@toleivu2gdbh.invalid;transport=wss >>>>>>> SIP/2.0 >>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>> A_IP_ADDRESS:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj8d05548a-91ef-4332-8617-32f8eeebf8f2 >>>>>>> From: >>>>>>> <sip:88881@A_IP_ADDRESS>;tag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d >>>>>>> To: <sip:88290@KAMAILIO_FQDN>;tag=hvra7mj3q0 >>>>>>> Call-ID: 46f44741-d155-4dd5-8fd8-78e540fc1acb >>>>>>> CSeq: 18326 ACK >>>>>>> Route: >>>>>>> <sip:KAMAILIO_FQDN;lr;r2=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >>>>>>> Route: >>>>>>> <sip:KAMAILIO_FQDN:8089;transport=ws;lr;r2=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>> User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 13.33.0 >>>>>>> Content-Length:  0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By loop I meant, Kamailio just relaying it back >>>>>>> to self and discard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>> On 07.05.2021 13:48, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you paste the ACK that loops, after being >>>>>>>> handled once by Kamailio? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 07.05.21 13:25, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Daniel, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, it is. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> alias=... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also tried with >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> listen = IP advertise FQDN >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> same behavior, loose_route() stops acting >>>>>>>>> correctly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PS: Forgot to add, Kamailio 5.4.3 / 5.4.4 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>> On 07.05.2021 13:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> is the KAMAILIO_FQDN set as local domain for >>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (via alias parameter or domain >>>>>>>>>> module+register myself)? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 07.05.21 11:17, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I saw there are some topics on this already >>>>>>>>>>> and carefully walked through all of them, >>>>>>>>>>> but can't solve following issue. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For a reason I do need that in Record-Route >>>>>>>>>>> header sent to endpoint would present FQDN. >>>>>>>>>>> If it matters, it's UDP/WSS conversion done >>>>>>>>>>> on Kamailio. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, scheme is quite simple >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Enpoint A ->UDP-> Kamailio ->WSS-> Endpoint >>>>>>>>>>> B (NAT) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Main issue here, that if in Record-Route >>>>>>>>>>> headers it's FQDN, but not IP addresses, on >>>>>>>>>>> a new transactions with a dialog (ACK on >>>>>>>>>>> 200, PRACK, BYE), Kamailio*loose_route()* >>>>>>>>>>> function resolves address of destination >>>>>>>>>>> not current dialog, but actual R-URI (or >>>>>>>>>>> itself, if R-URI is something from WebRTC >>>>>>>>>>> world) that is not correct due to NAT. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If in RR headers IP addresses are present - >>>>>>>>>>> all is working as expected. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As an example (RR with FQDN) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> B answers 200 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK >>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: >>>>>>>>>>> <sip:KAMAILIO_FQDN:8089;transport=ws;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: >>>>>>>>>>> <sip:KAMAILIO_FQDN;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>>>>>> <A_IP_ADDRESS>:5060;received=A IP >>>>>>>>>>> ADDRESS;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKPj67fb6d86-97d7-4231-995b-e54b0f62881e >>>>>>>>>>> To: <sip:88290@<KAMAILIO_FQDN>>;tag=hvra7mj3q0 >>>>>>>>>>> From: >>>>>>>>>>> <sip:+XXXX7688881@<KAMAILIO_FQDN>>;tag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d >>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 46f44741-d155-4dd5-8fd8-78e540fc1acb >>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 18326 INVITE >>>>>>>>>>> Contact: >>>>>>>>>>> <sip:88290@toleivu2gdbh.invalid;transport=wss> >>>>>>>>>>> Allow: >>>>>>>>>>> ACK,CANCEL,INVITE,MESSAGE,BYE,OPTIONS,INFO,NOTIFY,REFER >>>>>>>>>>> Supported: outbound >>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 817 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ACK looks like >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ACK >>>>>>>>>>> sip:88290@toleivu2gdbh.invalid;transport=wss >>>>>>>>>>> SIP/2.0 >>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>>>>>>>> A_IP_ADDRESS:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj8d05548a-91ef-4332-8617-32f8eeebf8f2 >>>>>>>>>>> From: >>>>>>>>>>> <sip:88881@A_IP_ADDRESS>;tag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d >>>>>>>>>>> To: <sip:88290@KAMAILIO_FQDN>;tag=hvra7mj3q0 >>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 46f44741-d155-4dd5-8fd8-78e540fc1acb >>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 18326 ACK >>>>>>>>>>> Route: >>>>>>>>>>> <sip:FQDN;lr;r2=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >>>>>>>>>>> Route: >>>>>>>>>>> <sip:FQDN:8089;transport=ws;lr;r2=on;ftag=0a3e31a6-96ad-42d0-9310-81b35cedbd3d;nat=wss> >>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 13.33.0 >>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:  0 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And Kamailio on *loose_route()* loops ACK >>>>>>>>>>> to itself. (with result of function == 1) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In a case if in Record-Route/Route headers >>>>>>>>>>> just IP address of Kamailio present, all >>>>>>>>>>> works as expected, but it's not really >>>>>>>>>>> behavior I want to achieve. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've tried to play with >>>>>>>>>>> *record_route_preset("...")* specifying >>>>>>>>>>> only WSS part (as suggested in >>>>>>>>>>> https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams >>>>>>>>>>> <https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams>) >>>>>>>>>>> with FQDN, but no luck. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also wanted to try approach using >>>>>>>>>>> record_route_preset() function in branch >>>>>>>>>>> route, but it was working only with first >>>>>>>>>>> branch, not affecting others (but I assume >>>>>>>>>>> having different RR headers across branches >>>>>>>>>>> is not a good idea) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >>>>>>>>>>> *sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> >>>>>>>>>>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! >>>>>>>>>>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>>> *https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com> >>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> >>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - Online >>>>>>>>>> May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) >>>>>>>>>> *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/ <https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >>>>>>>>> *sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> >>>>>>>>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! >>>>>>>>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>> *https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com> >>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> >>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - Online >>>>>>>> May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) >>>>>>>> *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/ <https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com> >>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> >>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - Online >>>>>> May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) >>>>>> *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/ <https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com> >>>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> >>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - Online >>>> May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone) >>>> *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/ <https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/> >>> __________________________________________________________ >>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial >>> Discussions >>>   * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> >>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, >>> do not reply only to the sender! >>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >>>   * >>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> David Villasmil >>> email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com >>> <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> >>> phone: +34669448337 >>> >>> __________________________________________________________ >>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >>> *sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> >>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! >>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >>> *https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >>   * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do >> not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >>   * >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> *sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> *https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >   * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not > reply only to the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >   * > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> > > -- > Regards, > > David Villasmil > email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com > <mailto:david.villasmil.work@gmail.com> > phone: +34669448337 > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >   * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply > only to the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >   * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> > > > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > *sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: > *https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users