On Dec 16, 2024, at 8:38 am, Christian Berger via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: BTW, could there have been a change in the default behavior of Kamailio? We think it used to "just work" in the past.

Hi, we have the following situation: Multiple UAs are subscribed to the proxy and get INVITEd via parallel forking. Now one of the UAs sends us a 302 status, we would like to handle this like a failure. So we'd like to CANCEL all the other branches, and forward the 302 status to the original INVITE. We have tried t_reply("302", "$T(reply_reason)") in the response, which almost solves this, however we cannot pass the required headers form the 302 response in it. BTW, could there have been a change in the default behavior of Kamailio? We think it used to "just work" in the past. Thank you very much   Christian Berger --  Christian Berger - berger(a)sipgate.de Telefon: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-0 Telefax: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-22 sipgate GmbH - Gladbacher Str. 74 - 40219 Düsseldorf HRB Düsseldorf 39841 - Geschäftsführer: Thilo Salmon, Tim Mois Steuernummer: 106/5724/7147, Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE219349391 www.sipgate.de - www.sipgate.co.uk __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!