Hey Daniel, We use Solaris virtualisation and it works great. The zones (VMs per se) are lightweight, easy to administer and rock solid. btw, common misconceptions are that you need sun (oracle) hardware and that the os is not free. These are both false. cheers Jason On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com> wrote: This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer

Hey Klaus, We use solaris as host AND guest ;) solaris is slightly different to normal VM systems in that you can't really load up "any OS" into the guest. There are branded zones that support a few flavours of linux (ala redhat, etc). However, in our experience the Solaris OS is really solid for all we need. you can read up alot here - http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/solaris/solaris11/overvie… Also there is some really nice network virtualisation you can do too. Cheers Jason On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at&gt; wrote: This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer

No. We use solaris11. But yes on any hardware On Aug 28, 2012 5:56 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer

Hi Daniel, not evaluation, but if you use it in production then you are required to buy a OS support contract. We however have standardised on Sun hardware which includes support for Solaris 11 in our production environment. So, yes a good point you make if you are going to be using in production on non-sun hardware you will need to pay Oracle ;( cheers Jason On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com > > On 8/28/12 6:09 PM, Jason Penton wrote: > > No. We use solaris11. > > > IIRC, solaris 11 was free for evaluation purposes, has that changed? > > BTW, since mainstream opensolaris was discontinued, anyone knows what is > the best derivative (if that is at all)? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > But yes on any hardware > On Aug 28, 2012 5:56 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; > >> Hello, >> >> On 8/28/12 10:33 AM, Jason Penton wrote: >> >> Hey Daniel, >> >> We use Solaris virtualisation and it works great. The zones (VMs per se) >> are lightweight, easy to administer and rock solid. >> >> btw, common misconceptions are that you need sun (oracle) hardware and >> that the os is not free. These are both false. >> >> >> so you use opensolaris, I guess, and then it can be any intel/amd arch >> server (e.g., dell, hp)? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> cheers >> Jason >> >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Carsten Bock &lt;carsten(a)ng-voice.com&gt;wrote;wrote: >> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> here's from my personal experience: >>> Our setup at ng-voice is a little weird sometimes: We've rented some >>> virtual servers at a german provider (who uses Xen). On these virtual >>> servers we've installed OpenVz, which for us is absolutely great, if >>> you are just working with Linux-Servers. While Xen is a rather >>> complete virtualization, OpenVz is lightweight and comes in handy, if >>> you just want to logically separate servers. We've got each IMS >>> component (P-/I-/S-CSCF, HSS, Application-Servers, Databases) running >>> on a dedicated OpenVz Container, which is really great. We've even got >>> a CentOs-Container running on a Debian OpenVz, which is started >>> "on-demand" in order to build RPM-Packages. With OpenVz you can even >>> move Containers from one host to another, theoretically with zero >>> downtime (doesn't work with SEMS, don't know about other software). >>> For our IMS-setup, we work with RTP-Relaying, which works great within >>> virtualization, i cannot complain. >>> >>> At another customer (a fibre provider in Germany), we're running all >>> the infrastructure on Xen-only. An infrastructure provider takes care >>> of the administration, but those servers run poorly (RTP-Relaying is >>> okay but everything else is really slow). >>> >>> Conclusion for me: VoIP on virtual servers can work great, but the >>> virtualization infrastructure needs to be administered properly which >>> may not be an easy task, if you are new in this subject. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Carsten >>> >>> 2012/8/28 Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > just asking to see your experience deploying sip platforms on virtual >>> > systems. So far I was running Kamailio in virtual machines and no >>> problems, >>> > but I insisted that media servers to be on physical machines. Lately >>> is more >>> > pressure from the market to go everything virtual. >>> > >>> > So the question is more about having everything on virtual systems, >>> proxy >>> > and media server, where the media server can deal with transcoding, >>> > conference rooms and IVRs. >>> > >>> > Any strong comments pro or against? >>> > >>> > What is your preferred virtualization system for such deployments? >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Daniel >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com >>> > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> > Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - >>> http://asipto.com/u/kat >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Carsten Bock >>> CEO (Geschäftsführer) >>> >>> ng-voice GmbH >>> Schomburgstr. 80 >>> D-22767 Hamburg / Germany >>> >>> http://www.ng-voice.com >>> mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com >>> >>> Office +49 40 34927219 <%2B49%2040%2034927219> >>> Fax +49 40 34927220 <%2B49%2040%2034927220> >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189 >>> Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock >>> Ust-ID: DE279344284 >>> >>> Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben: >>> http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >> >> This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer >> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat >> >> This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer > > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat > > This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications (PTY) Ltd. at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer

I'm using asterisk (over 3 years) and kamailio (about 1 year) in a *production* environment using Xen and I have almost no problems with timers (they were previously with 100Hz), but I have experienced A LOT of problems with asterisk or any voip-related projects using OpenVZ. So from my own perspective, OpenVZ (which is a more cheaper) is only suitable for hosting (web or such of tasks) or any non-realtime tasks. Maybe it was caused by incorrect settings on host (which was out of my control). Maybe I'm wrong but to me, Xen is better vs OpenVZ :-) 2012/8/28 Olle E. Johansson &lt;oej(a)edvina.net&gt;