[Serusers] Same NAT again - sr-users - kamailio.org

List overview All Threads
Download

[Serusers] Same NAT again

[Serusers] Quintum and radius_aith

[Serusers] Too Many Hops

deviator

18 Nov 2005 18 Nov '05

8 p.m.

Hello! Can someone explain me how i can correctly check if 2 UA's are behind same NAT ? for example: A and B UA's have private 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, SER have a public ip A calling B For A all is clear for me - SRCIP have an A external ip and i can use it But i dont see any B external ip, RURI have a private ip part (192.168.1.2) Pls show me the way!

Reply

Show replies by date

Greger V. Teigre

18 Nov 18 Nov

8:11 p.m.

http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-November/025541.html I never heard from Noel if he made it work. Noel? g-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "deviator" <deviator(a)inbox.ru> To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:00 PM Subject: [Serusers] Same NAT again

Hello! Can someone explain me how i can correctly check if 2 UA's are behind same NAT ? for example: A and B UA's have private 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, SER have a public ip A calling B For A all is clear for me - SRCIP have an A external ip and i can use it But i dont see any B external ip, RURI have a private ip part (192.168.1.2) Pls show me the way! _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Reply

Noel Sharpe

23 Nov 23 Nov

9:21 a.m.

Sorry for the delay in answering this - I am not in the office this week. Using Greger's advice, I was able to get the detection of same NAT working (sometimes - depends on me calling nathelper I think), but due to other pressures (to do with getting cascading rtpproxy set up with rtpproxy running in bridge mode) I have had to delay implementing the solution fully. When I do I will of course share with all... I think that it will be a case of doing the detection before messing with the contact with nathelper, and then using that to decide whether fix_nated_contact is called. Noel Greger V. Teigre wrote:

http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-November/025541.html I never heard from Noel if he made it work. Noel? g-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "deviator" <deviator(a)inbox.ru> To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:00 PM Subject: [Serusers] Same NAT again

Hello! Can someone explain me how i can correctly check if 2 UA's are behind same NAT ? for example: A and B UA's have private 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, SER have a public ip A calling B For A all is clear for me - SRCIP have an A external ip and i can use it But i dont see any B external ip, RURI have a private ip part (192.168.1.2) Pls show me the way! _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Reply

Greger V. Teigre

24 Nov 24 Nov

10:14 a.m.

Sorry for the delay in answering this - I am not in the office this week. Using Greger's advice, I was able to get the detection of same NAT working (sometimes - depends on me calling nathelper I think), but due to other pressures (to do with getting cascading rtpproxy set up with rtpproxy running in bridge mode) I have had to delay implementing the solution fully. When I do I will of course share with all... I think that it will be a case of doing the detection before messing with the contact with nathelper, and then using that to decide whether fix_nated_contact is called.

Sounds like the right approach. Look forward to hearing from you on this. g-)

Noel Greger V. Teigre wrote:

http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-November/025541.html I never heard from Noel if he made it work. Noel? g-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "deviator" <deviator(a)inbox.ru> To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:00 PM Subject: [Serusers] Same NAT again

Hello! Can someone explain me how i can correctly check if 2 UA's are behind same NAT ? for example: A and B UA's have private 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, SER have a public ip A calling B For A all is clear for me - SRCIP have an A external ip and i can use it But i dont see any B external ip, RURI have a private ip part (192.168.1.2) Pls show me the way! _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Reply

6891

days inactive

6897

days old

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

Manage subscription

3 comments

3 participants

tags (0)

participants (3)

deviator
Greger V. Teigre
Noel Sharpe