the new send_reply() function is not documented in sl/README.
another related thing: would it be logical to also have corresponding reply_error() function especially when t_relay seems to create transaction even in case of some internal errors.
-- juha
Hello,
On 03/10/2009 08:09 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
the new send_reply() function is not documented in sl/README.
added in trunk. I will backport to 1.5.x.
another related thing: would it be logical to also have corresponding reply_error() function especially when t_relay seems to create transaction even in case of some internal errors.
Now there is no t_reply_error() that can be used, but can be added in the future.
Cheers, Daniel
-- juha
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Now there is no t_reply_error() that can be used, but can be added in the future.
daniel,
should there be, because how else i can report correctly t_relay() error:
if (!t_relay()) { if (!t_check_trans()) { sl_reply_error(); } else { ******* what to put here? }; };
-- juha
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
jh＠tutpro.com