13 Apr
2020
13 Apr
'20
2:04 p.m.
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK to a
INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
13 Apr
13 Apr
2:16 p.m.
Hello,
is it about ACK after 200ok or the ACK after 300 or greater reply?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:04, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK to a
INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
2:18 p.m.
Sorry i didn't specify.
It is after the 200 Ok. Will it be different in a reply greater than 300?
Best regards
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
Hello,
is it about ACK after 200ok or the ACK after 300 or greater reply?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:04, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK to a
INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
3:08 p.m.
For 300 and greater reply transaction ends on reply and ACK is a new
thansaction
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, 13:25 Duarte Rocha, <duarterocha91(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry i didn't specify.
It is after the 200 Ok. Will it be different in a reply greater than 300?
Best regards
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
Hello,
is it about ACK after 200ok or the ACK after 300 or greater reply?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:04, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK to a
INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:10 p.m.
Sorry, opposit. For 200 ACK is separate. For 300 or greater it is belongs o
same transaction ofcourse.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, 14:08 Yuriy Gorlichenko, <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For 300 and greater reply transaction ends on reply
and ACK is a new
thansaction
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, 13:25 Duarte Rocha, <duarterocha91(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry i didn't specify.
It is after the 200 Ok. Will it be different in a reply greater than 300?
Best regards
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
Hello,
is it about ACK after 200ok or the ACK after 300 or greater reply?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:04, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK to a
INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:31 p.m.
By default the transaction that gets a final reply is kept for another
5sec or so in memory to deal with retranmissions, etc ... There is a
wait_timer parameter in tm module.
The ACK after 200ok is separate transaction and has no influence on
INVITE transaction. For the ACK after 300+ reply, there should be some
retransmissons of the reply in the INVITE transaction.
The dialog module is influenced by the missing ACK after 200ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:18, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Sorry i didn't specify.
It is after the 200 Ok. Will it be different in a reply greater than 300?
Best regards
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> escreveu:
Hello,
is it about ACK after 200ok or the ACK after 300 or greater reply?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:04, Duarte Rocha wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK
to a INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
7:28 p.m.
Thanks for the reply.
Here is my scenario :
Client________Kamailio______Destination_1____Destination_2
|_____INV_______|_______________|_______________|
|---------------------->|______INV______|_______________|
|_______________|---------------------->|_______________|
|_______________|_______________|_______________|
|_______________|____200_OK_____|_______________|
|_______________|<-----------------------|_______________|
|____200_OK_____|_______________|_______________|
|<-----------------------|_______________|_______________|
|_______________|_______________|_______________|
|___INV(Retr)____|_______________|_______________|
|---------------------->|______INV______|_______________|
|_______________|------------------------------------------------>|
|_______________|_______________|_______________|
As you can see, the client never sends the ACK to Kamailio and retransmits
the first INVITE (No To-TAG) again after more than 5s. After this Kamailio
uses Dispatcher to send to a destination from a group and chooses
Destination_2.
Since the INVITE is sent to Destination_2, my system treats this as a
second call being created.
Should this scenario happen under the SIP stack rules? Shouldn't Kamailio
send a "491 - Request Pending" on this scenario?
If not, how i can configure Kamailio to behave like that? In my code i have
the following conditions for a Request to able to be sent by DISPATCHER :
- if( is_method("INVITE") && !has_totag() )
- if(!t_check_trans())
What other conditions can i setup in order for this INVITE
to be treated like a retransmission or being rejected?
Best Regards,
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 13:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
By default the transaction that gets a final reply is
kept for another
5sec or so in memory to deal with retranmissions, etc ... There is a
wait_timer parameter in tm module.
The ACK after 200ok is separate transaction and has no influence on INVITE
transaction. For the ACK after 300+ reply, there should be some
retransmissons of the reply in the INVITE transaction.
The dialog module is influenced by the missing ACK after 200ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:18, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Sorry i didn't specify.
It is after the 200 Ok. Will it be different in a reply greater than 300?
Best regards
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
Hello,
is it about ACK after 200ok or the ACK after 300 or greater reply?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:04, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK to a
INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
7:33 p.m.
Last email diagram got kinda deformatted. In case you need me to clarify
the scenario, client sends the INVITE, receives the 200 OK and never send
the ACK. After more than 5seconds the client retransmits the first INVITE
again and Kamailio sends it to the second destination of the Dispatcher
group.
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 13:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
By default the transaction that gets a final reply is
kept for another
5sec or so in memory to deal with retranmissions, etc ... There is a
wait_timer parameter in tm module.
The ACK after 200ok is separate transaction and has no influence on INVITE
transaction. For the ACK after 300+ reply, there should be some
retransmissons of the reply in the INVITE transaction.
The dialog module is influenced by the missing ACK after 200ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:18, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Sorry i didn't specify.
It is after the 200 Ok. Will it be different in a reply greater than 300?
Best regards
A segunda, 13/04/2020, 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
Hello,
is it about ACK after 200ok or the ACK after 300 or greater reply?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13.04.20 13:04, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,
How much time will Kamailio keep a transaction active if the ACK to a
INVITE is never received by Kamailio?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
1689
days inactive
1689
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Duarte Rocha -
Yuriy Gorlichenko