11 Dec
2008
11 Dec
'08
11:19 p.m.
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
Fecha: Jueves, Diciembre 11, 2008 4:52 pm
Asunto: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Kamalio Support for RFC 3323 " Privacy"
El Jueves, 11 de Diciembre de 2008,
ingdavidcespedes(a)cable.net.co
escribió:> SORRYYYYYYY, you were right. What i'm trying to say is
that if the UA
Agree with all that you say. Only that the "P-Preferred-Identity:" is
optional. If it is not present, the proxy should add a predefined P-Asserted-Identity:
header field, if it is going to send the request to a trusted node.
But as you can see, this implies different possible cases. So it would be very nice if we
can do all of this using some module or something like that, don't you think so?
insert the p-p-i and privacy headers, the proxy
should understand
this and
do what I say above.
The user sends the request with:
From: Anonymous <sip:anonymous@XXXXXx>
P-Preferred-Identity: <sip:alice@domain.com>
Privacy: id
Then the proxy knows who is by checking PPI header and could ask
for
credentiales. After it, the proxy would remove PPI before routing
the
request.
If the proxy sends the request to a trusted node, it could add PAI
header: P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:alice@domain.com>
Privacy: id
And the next element would remove it if it routes to an untrusted
node/endpoint.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
12 Dec
12 Dec
12:17 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] Kamalio Support for RFC 3323 " Privacy"
El Jueves, 11 de Diciembre de 2008, ingdavidcespedes(a)cable.net.co escribió:
Agree with all that you say. Only that the
"P-Preferred-Identity:" is
optional. If it is not present, the proxy should add a predefined
P-Asserted-Identity: header field, if it is going to send the request to a
trusted node.
Well, PPI is just used by the client if it wants to tell him proxy who he is
(and doesn't want to indicate it in the From since theorically the From
shouldn't be changed by the proxy).
But as you can see, this implies different possible
cases. So it would be
very nice if we can do all of this using some module or something like
that, don't you think so?
I already implement this exactly behaviour by examining the PPI header instead
of From when PPI is present. Perhaps you mean a specific module/functions for
this task? Could you describe these functions?
Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
7:32 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] Kamalio Support for RFC 3323 " Privacy"
ingdavidcespedes(a)cable.net.co writes:
But as you can see, this implies different possible
cases. So it
would be very nice if we can do all of this using some module or
something like that, don't you think so?
i'm using ppi and pai headers and have never thought that i need some
module for that. kamailio scripting language as it is today, has been
enough for me.
-- juha
12:53 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] Kamalio Support for RFC 3323 " Privacy"
On Friday 12 December 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote:
ingdavidcespedes(a)cable.net.co writes:
Hi Juha,
i agree. We also just use a sub-route in the script, that tries to get the
identity from the auth, prefered or from user (if not anonymous), and set a
AVP that is used in the script for example to later to set the asserted
identity.
Cheers,
Henning
But as you can see, this implies different
possible cases. So it
would be very nice if we can do all of this using some module or
something like that, don't you think so?
i'm using ppi and pai headers and have never thought that i need some
module for that. kamailio scripting language as it is today, has been
enough for me.
5639
days inactive
5640
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Henning Westerholt -
ingdavidcespedes＠cable.net.co -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
jh＠tutpro.com