Untitled Document Hi...
What´s the best system in performance question, to use NAT MediaProxy or RTPProxy?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alcindo Schleder Sistema Processa Acessoria e Comunicações Ltda.
a.. MSN: a_schleder@hotmail.com b.. Skipe: alcindo_schleder Demétrio P. dos Santos, 705 - 95670-000 - Gramado-RS-Brasil Celular + 55 54 9966 7591 alcindo@processa.org Fone +55 54 3286-1738 comercial@processa.org
I think rtpproxy, because of c programming, has more efficiency, rather than scripting(mediaproxy)
--- MagoDaViola magodaviola@ig.com.br wrote:
Untitled Document Hi...
What´s the best system in performance question, to use NAT MediaProxy or RTPProxy?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alcindo Schleder Sistema Processa Acessoria e ComunicaçõesLtda.
a.. MSN: a_schleder@hotmail.com b.. Skipe: alcindo_schleder Demétrio P. dos Santos, 705 - 95670-000 -Gramado-RS-Brasil Celular + 55 54 9966 7591 alcindo@processa.org Fone +55 54 3286-1738 comercial@processa.org
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org
yes. I tried rtpproxy and mediaproxy before. rtpproxy is more efficiency. but mediaproxy is very good at cluster.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Pezhman Lali pezhman_lali@yahoo.com wrote:
I think rtpproxy, because of c programming, has more efficiency, rather than scripting(mediaproxy)
--- MagoDaViola magodaviola@ig.com.br wrote:
Untitled Document Hi...
What´s the best system in performance question, to use NAT MediaProxy or RTPProxy?
Alcindo Schleder Sistema Processa Acessoria e ComunicaçõesLtda.
a.. MSN: a_schleder@hotmail.com b.. Skipe: alcindo_schleder Demétrio P. dos Santos, 705 - 95670-000 -Gramado-RS-Brasil Celular + 55 54 9966 7591 alcindo@processa.org Fone +55 54 3286-1738 comercial@processa.org
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
BTW, do you have any benchmark figures you could share with us regarding rtpproxy and mediaproxy performances ?
The only thing I found (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Portaone+rtpproxy) is: "It should be able to handle up to 2,000 simulateneous G.729 sessions on a decent machine (P4 2.5-3.0 GHz)"
-pascal
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Gang Lau gangban.lau@gmail.com wrote:
yes. I tried rtpproxy and mediaproxy before. rtpproxy is more efficiency. but mediaproxy is very good at cluster.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Pezhman Lali pezhman_lali@yahoo.com wrote:
I think rtpproxy, because of c programming, has more efficiency, rather than scripting(mediaproxy)
--- MagoDaViola magodaviola@ig.com.br wrote:
Untitled Document Hi...
What´s the best system in performance question, to use NAT MediaProxy or RTPProxy?
Alcindo Schleder Sistema Processa Acessoria e ComunicaçõesLtda.
a.. MSN: a_schleder@hotmail.com b.. Skipe: alcindo_schleder Demétrio P. dos Santos, 705 - 95670-000 -Gramado-RS-Brasil Celular + 55 54 9966 7591 alcindo@processa.org Fone +55 54 3286-1738 comercial@processa.org
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
That machine only had a little traffic. It used Xeon 3GHZ to handle about 200 sessions.
But I think it is hard to handle 2,000 sessions without any tunning at P4 3GHZ. As I remember about 70% percent cpu is used. But maybe new version rtpproxy has changed something.
regards, Gang
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Pascal Maugeri pascal.maugeri@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, do you have any benchmark figures you could share with us regarding rtpproxy and mediaproxy performances ?
The only thing I found (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Portaone+rtpproxy) is: "It should be able to handle up to 2,000 simulateneous G.729 sessions on a decent machine (P4 2.5-3.0 GHz)"
-pascal
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Gang Lau gangban.lau@gmail.com wrote:
yes. I tried rtpproxy and mediaproxy before. rtpproxy is more efficiency. but mediaproxy is very good at cluster.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Pezhman Lali pezhman_lali@yahoo.com wrote:
I think rtpproxy, because of c programming, has more efficiency, rather than scripting(mediaproxy)
--- MagoDaViola magodaviola@ig.com.br wrote:
Untitled Document Hi...
What´s the best system in performance question, to use NAT MediaProxy or RTPProxy?
Alcindo Schleder Sistema Processa Acessoria e ComunicaçõesLtda.
a.. MSN: a_schleder@hotmail.com b.. Skipe: alcindo_schleder Demétrio P. dos Santos, 705 - 95670-000 -Gramado-RS-Brasil Celular + 55 54 9966 7591 alcindo@processa.org Fone +55 54 3286-1738 comercial@processa.org
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-
Gang Lau -
MagoDaViola -
Pascal Maugeri -
Pezhman Lali