4 Mar
2005
4 Mar
'05
6:15 a.m.
Raymond Chen writes:
After removing the _F from HDR, still a error during
compilation
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall
lcr_mod.c: In function `load_contacts':
...
lcr_mod.c:830: error: too many arguments to function
`next_branch'
lcr_mod.c:852: error: too many arguments to function `next_branch'
make[1]: *** [lcr_mod.o] Error 1
ok, since i last time compiled lcr module for 0.9.0 it seems that iptel
folks have added a new argument to next_branch function. just remove
the last zero argument from the two function calls.
i'll make available a 0.9.0 version of lcr module on my web site
shortly.
-- juha
4 Mar
4 Mar
6:22 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: lcr and ser 0.9.0
Juha,
When you do make a ser-0.9 compatible version of LCR availble, please
let me know. I'm using a version from the day you originally committed
it to CVS.
Is the web site you referred to http://lohi.tutpro.com ??
Regards,
Paul
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:15:53 +0200, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)lohi.tutpro.com> wrote:
Raymond Chen writes:
After removing the _F from HDR, still a error
during compilation
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall
lcr_mod.c: In function `load_contacts':
...
lcr_mod.c:830: error: too many arguments to
function `next_branch'
lcr_mod.c:852: error: too many arguments to function `next_branch'
make[1]: *** [lcr_mod.o] Error 1
ok, since i last time compiled lcr module for 0.9.0 it seems that iptel
folks have added a new argument to next_branch function. just remove
the last zero argument from the two function calls.
i'll make available a 0.9.0 version of lcr module on my web site
shortly.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6:25 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: lcr and ser 0.9.0
rel_0.9.0 version of lcr module is available as
http://tutpro.com/tmp/lcr-0.9.0.tgz
-- juha
12:20 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: lcr and ser 0.9.0
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Juha Heinanen wrote:
rel_0.9.0 version of lcr module is available as
http://tutpro.com/tmp/lcr-0.9.0.tgz
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Great,
Instead of using tag HEAD I now use rel_0_9_0 togheter with this version
of lcr and it works fine.
0(25434) Fri Mar 4 04:21:37 2005 - <null>- INVITE
Call-ID: 00036bc3-7aa53655-7b98e96c-700c2631(a)130.244.194.233
From: sip:0856204081@sip-corporate1.tele2.se
To: sip:0890510@sip-corporate1.tele2.se
0(25434) Routeblock 2 - Calls from customers
0(25434) Call from customer: Test
0(25434) Call passed A-number check
0(25434) Routeblock 3 - To customer?
0(25434) Routeblock 4 - Call not to customer, to gateways
1(25438) Failureroute 1 - Get next gateway from LCR
1(25438) After next_gw()
1(25438) After t_on_failure
0(25434) ACC: transaction answered: method=INVITE, uid=n/a,
call_id=00036bc3-7aa53655-7b98e96c-700c2631(a)130.244.194.233,
from="0856204081"
<sip:0856204081@sip-corporate1.tele2.se>;tag=00036bc37aa5010c60335bcd-0ee41656,
to=<sip:0890510@sip-corporate1.tele2.se>;tag=2DEB4268-20F,
i-uri=sip:0890510@sip-corporate1.tele2.se,
o-uri=sip:0890510@128.244.188.14, code=200
0(25434) ACC: transaction answered: method=BYE, uid=n/a,
call_id=00036bc3-7aa53655-7b98e96c-700c2631(a)130.244.194.233,
from="0856204081"
<sip:0856204081@sip-corporate1.tele2.se>;tag=00036bc37aa5010c60335bcd-0ee41656,
to=<sip:0890510@sip-corporate1.tele2.se>;tag=2DEB4268-20F,
i-uri=sip:130.244.190.42:5060;ftag=00036bc37aa5010c60335bcd-0ee41656;lr=on,
o-uri=sip:0890510@130.244.188.14:5060, code=200
Best regards,
Thomas Björklund
12:37 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: lcr and ser 0.9.0
Thomas Björklund writes:
Instead of using tag HEAD I now use rel_0_9_0 togheter
with this version
of lcr and it works fine.
so most likely HEAD has some bug that causes the crash. there has been
lots of new code introduced recently.
-- juha
3:56 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: lcr and ser 0.9.0
Cheers guys, works a treat....even though I only have one GW entered as
yet, I see to get a default catch all for every pstn number you leave
prefix blank...is that correct I tried [0-9],%, etc etc, but blank seems
to work.
Iqbal
On 3/4/2005, "Juha Heinanen" <jh(a)lohi.tutpro.com> wrote:
Thomas Björklund writes:
Instead of using tag HEAD I now use rel_0_9_0
togheter with this version
of lcr and it works fine.
so most likely HEAD has some bug that causes the crash. there has been
lots of new code introduced recently.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
8:47 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: lcr and ser 0.9.0
Iqbal writes:
Cheers guys, works a treat....even though I only have
one GW entered as
yet, I see to get a default catch all for every pstn number you leave
prefix blank...is that correct I tried [0-9],%, etc etc, but blank seems
to work.
as the name says, prefix is a prefix. an empty prefix thus matches
anything.
-- juha
9:03 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Re: lcr and ser 0.9.0
u know sometime u just miss the logic...I guess if no prefix, then it
matches...how simple can it get :-)
Iqbal
On 3/4/2005, "Juha Heinanen" <jh(a)lohi.tutpro.com> wrote:
Iqbal writes:
Cheers guys, works a treat....even though I only
have one GW entered as
yet, I see to get a default catch all for every pstn number you leave
prefix blank...is that correct I tried [0-9],%, etc etc, but blank seems
to work.
as the name says, prefix is a prefix. an empty prefix thus matches
anything.
-- juha
7233
days inactive
7233
days old
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Iqbal -
Java Rockx -
Juha Heinanen -
Thomas Björklund