I have changed my config too much, too often. I may have had fix_nated_sdp AND force_rtp_proxy at the same time (so it put in both addresses, received and proxy/rtpproxy). You may want to keep an eye out for that - before changing it, see if it was changed already and complain. I am still getting the error message though. (debug=3.) From the code it looks like it may not really be an 'error' the 2nd pass through extract_mediaip. Thanks for your contribution and your help. Dovid -----Original Message----- From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:58 AM To: Dovid Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper Very strange, I'm using latest cvs version of nathelper with 0.8.11 release just fine. -Maxim Dovid wrote: dev 'ERROR: those IP

It is constantly changing. I am working in a development environment. I am using nathelper separately on a different server with a few people testing it. That version is before the 0.8.11 release and is not using rtp_proxy. If you set debug=3, do you see those messages? At some point in testing I was not using a reply_route. It looks like the 100 and 180 are handled OK because (of both) #1, they are handled by tm, and #2 they do not have Contact or SDP anyway so there is nothing to fix. The '200 OK' though was hitting loose_route. I had add_rport(); and fix_nated_contact(); before loose_route and/or after loose_route before t_relay. When it sent it out, it was not fixed though. In this case it was a call from the PSTN, which the gateway is not behind nat, to a phone behind nat. So the INVITE did not need fixing, but the replies did. Is there something in the code that blocked it from fixing? (If this were in a reply_route, it would have fixed it. Is it checking?) With reply_route it works OK, and my config has changed since then anyway so it is sort of irrelevant. Dovid -----Original Message----- From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:54 PM To: Dovid Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper Can I have a look at your config? -Maxim Dovid wrote: received