Does SER implement something like "interworking function (SIP-H.323 IWF)"?
I saw this at the URL http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/internetworking/h323/draft-agrawal-si p-h323-interworking-reqs-02.txt of the SER website.
I am asking this because I have a H.323 Mediatrix Gateway that I failed to upgrade to SIP.
Thanks, __________________________________ NZEYIMANA Emery Fabrice NEFA Computing Services, Inc. P.O. Box 5078 Kigali Office Phone: +250-51 11 06 Office Fax: +250-50 15 19 Mobile: +250-08517768 Email: dg@nefacomp.net http://www.nefacomp.net/
No and it will not be supported.
Jan.
On 26-07 15:41, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
Does SER implement something like "interworking function (SIP-H.323 IWF)"?
I saw this at the URL http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/internetworking/h323/draft-agrawal-si p-h323-interworking-reqs-02.txt of the SER website.
I am asking this because I have a H.323 Mediatrix Gateway that I failed to upgrade to SIP.
Thanks, __________________________________ NZEYIMANA Emery Fabrice NEFA Computing Services, Inc. P.O. Box 5078 Kigali Office Phone: +250-51 11 06 Office Fax: +250-50 15 19 Mobile: +250-08517768 Email: dg@nefacomp.net http://www.nefacomp.net/
First of all thanks for the help you always provide to unforunate users like me. The guides you gave me for the accounting module were followed and I can now have missed calls entered in the database but unfortunately I cannot see completed calls.
Any help? I need all the calls in my DATABASE. Completed and Uncompleted.
Thanks Emery ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Director General: NEFACOMP" dg@nefacomp.net Cc: "serusers" serusers@lists.iptel.org; "Jiri Kuthan" jiri@iptel.org Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 17:41 Subject: Re: SIP-H.323 IWF
No and it will not be supported.
Jan.
On 26-07 15:41, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
Does SER implement something like "interworking function (SIP-H.323
IWF)"?
I saw this at the URL
http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/internetworking/h323/draft-agrawal-si
p-h323-interworking-reqs-02.txt of the SER website.
I am asking this because I have a H.323 Mediatrix Gateway that I failed
to
upgrade to SIP.
Thanks, __________________________________ NZEYIMANA Emery Fabrice NEFA Computing Services, Inc. P.O. Box 5078 Kigali Office Phone: +250-51 11 06 Office Fax: +250-50 15 19 Mobile: +250-08517768 Email: dg@nefacomp.net http://www.nefacomp.net/
Hello,
make sure that acc module is loaded, and that for all messages you execute setflag(1); in your script. This flags marks transactions that will be accounted.
If it still doesn't work, send your complete configuration file to serhelp@lists.iptel.org, but BEFORE DOING SO, really check that acc modules is compiled with database support (if you want db support) and that it is loaded and you use setflag in the script.
Jan.
On 26-07 17:14, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
First of all thanks for the help you always provide to unforunate users like me. The guides you gave me for the accounting module were followed and I can now have missed calls entered in the database but unfortunately I cannot see completed calls.
Any help? I need all the calls in my DATABASE. Completed and Uncompleted.
Thanks Emery ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Director General: NEFACOMP" dg@nefacomp.net Cc: "serusers" serusers@lists.iptel.org; "Jiri Kuthan" jiri@iptel.org Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 17:41 Subject: Re: SIP-H.323 IWF
No and it will not be supported.
Jan.
On 26-07 15:41, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
Does SER implement something like "interworking function (SIP-H.323
IWF)"?
I saw this at the URL
http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/internetworking/h323/draft-agrawal-si
p-h323-interworking-reqs-02.txt of the SER website.
I am asking this because I have a H.323 Mediatrix Gateway that I failed
to
upgrade to SIP.
Thanks, __________________________________ NZEYIMANA Emery Fabrice NEFA Computing Services, Inc. P.O. Box 5078 Kigali Office Phone: +250-51 11 06 Office Fax: +250-50 15 19 Mobile: +250-08517768 Email: dg@nefacomp.net http://www.nefacomp.net/
Can it report on missed calls if if the acc.so module was not loaded? I tried setflag(1); and setflag(3); but both won't report completed calls
I am attaching my ser.cfg file Also remember to check my ALIASES configuration. They work for my FXS but don't work for XLite.
Thanks, Emery ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Director General: NEFACOMP" dg@nefacomp.net Cc: "serusers" serusers@lists.iptel.org; "Jiri Kuthan" jiri@iptel.org Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 18:11 Subject: Re: SIP-H.323 IWF
Hello,
make sure that acc module is loaded, and that for all messages you execute setflag(1); in your script. This flags marks transactions that will be accounted.
If it still doesn't work, send your complete configuration file to serhelp@lists.iptel.org, but BEFORE DOING SO, really check that acc modules is compiled with database support (if you want db support) and that it is loaded and you use setflag in the script.
Jan.
On 26-07 17:14, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
First of all thanks for the help you always provide to unforunate users
like
me. The guides you gave me for the accounting module were followed and I can
now
have missed calls entered in the database but unfortunately I cannot see completed calls.
Any help? I need all the calls in my DATABASE. Completed and
Uncompleted.
Thanks Emery ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Director General: NEFACOMP" dg@nefacomp.net Cc: "serusers" serusers@lists.iptel.org; "Jiri Kuthan" jiri@iptel.org Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 17:41 Subject: Re: SIP-H.323 IWF
No and it will not be supported.
Jan.
On 26-07 15:41, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
Does SER implement something like "interworking function (SIP-H.323
IWF)"?
I saw this at the URL
http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/internetworking/h323/draft-agrawal-si
p-h323-interworking-reqs-02.txt of the SER website.
I am asking this because I have a H.323 Mediatrix Gateway that I
failed
to
upgrade to SIP.
Thanks, __________________________________ NZEYIMANA Emery Fabrice NEFA Computing Services, Inc. P.O. Box 5078 Kigali Office Phone: +250-51 11 06 Office Fax: +250-50 15 19 Mobile: +250-08517768 Email: dg@nefacomp.net http://www.nefacomp.net/
Put setflag(3) also into the loose_route condition. Do I understand it correctly that INVITEs get logged while BYEs not ?
Jan.
On 26-07 17:44, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
Can it report on missed calls if if the acc.so module was not loaded? I tried setflag(1); and setflag(3); but both won't report completed calls
I am attaching my ser.cfg file Also remember to check my ALIASES configuration. They work for my FXS but don't work for XLite.
Thanks, Emery ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Director General: NEFACOMP" dg@nefacomp.net Cc: "serusers" serusers@lists.iptel.org; "Jiri Kuthan" jiri@iptel.org Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 18:11 Subject: Re: SIP-H.323 IWF
Hello,
make sure that acc module is loaded, and that for all messages you execute setflag(1); in your script. This flags marks transactions that will be accounted.
If it still doesn't work, send your complete configuration file to serhelp@lists.iptel.org, but BEFORE DOING SO, really check that acc modules is compiled with database support (if you want db support) and that it is loaded and you use setflag in the script.
Jan.
On 26-07 17:14, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
First of all thanks for the help you always provide to unforunate users
like
me. The guides you gave me for the accounting module were followed and I can
now
have missed calls entered in the database but unfortunately I cannot see completed calls.
Any help? I need all the calls in my DATABASE. Completed and
Uncompleted.
Thanks Emery ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Director General: NEFACOMP" dg@nefacomp.net Cc: "serusers" serusers@lists.iptel.org; "Jiri Kuthan" jiri@iptel.org Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 17:41 Subject: Re: SIP-H.323 IWF
No and it will not be supported.
Jan.
On 26-07 15:41, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
Does SER implement something like "interworking function (SIP-H.323
IWF)"?
I saw this at the URL
http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/internetworking/h323/draft-agrawal-si
p-h323-interworking-reqs-02.txt of the SER website.
I am asking this because I have a H.323 Mediatrix Gateway that I
failed
to
upgrade to SIP.
Thanks, __________________________________ NZEYIMANA Emery Fabrice NEFA Computing Services, Inc. P.O. Box 5078 Kigali Office Phone: +250-51 11 06 Office Fax: +250-50 15 19 Mobile: +250-08517768 Email: dg@nefacomp.net http://www.nefacomp.net/
I am attaching my ser.cfg file Also remember to check my ALIASES configuration. They work for my FXS but don't work for XLite.
Config looks fine, I can't tell you more without _exact_ description of the problem, possibly accompanied by message dumps.
Jan.
It works now very fine. Except an annoying TAG thing that is being added to the SIP address in the table. I just changed all the params to 1 (dg_flag, log_missed_flag, ...) as per the config fileI received from Klauss. Even the aliases are fine now. I also added the line modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1), restarted the SER server and commented that line. I got it from the ser.cfg that I received from the great Klaus Darilion (Many thanks to HIM)
What does it instruct SER to do? Also I wish to know what these functions do: record_route() and loose_route(). In a simple English or French language please!!! I speak C but with many mistakes!!!
Thanks for your time. You are a nice man (man or woman I am not sure!!!!!)
Thanks, Emery ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Director General: NEFACOMP" dg@nefacomp.net Cc: "Jiri Kuthan" jiri@iptel.org; "serusers" serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 13:43 Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: SIP-H.323 IWF
I am attaching my ser.cfg file Also remember to check my ALIASES configuration. They work for my FXS
but
don't work for XLite.
Config looks fine, I can't tell you more without _exact_ description of the problem, possibly accompanied by message dumps.
Jan.
On 28-07 13:19, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
It works now very fine. Except an annoying TAG thing that is being added to the SIP address in the table.
The "TAG thing" must be there, see RFC3261
I just changed all the params to 1 (dg_flag, log_missed_flag, ...) as per the config fileI received from Klauss. Even the aliases are fine now. I also added the line modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1), restarted the SER server and commented that line. I got it from the ser.cfg that I received from the great Klaus Darilion (Many thanks to HIM)
What does it instruct SER to do?
To insert ;lr=on instead of ;lr into Record-Route headers.
Also I wish to know what these functions do: record_route() and loose_route(). In a simple English or French language please!!! I speak C but with many mistakes!!!
record_route inserts Record-Route header into the message. loose_route processes Route headers, if any.
Jan.
-
Director General: NEFACOMP -
Jan Janak