[Serusers] Please help...
I have three UA UA1 -> beeplove@iptel.org (Windows Messenger) UA2 -> beeplove@projuktee.com (Kphone) UA3 -> someone@projuktee.com (Windows Messenger) These three UAs, registering from outside of my network but behind NAT. I can communicate between, UA1 <=> UA2 and UA1 <=> UA3 but not between UA2 <=> UA3 I am running ser-0.9.0 with rtpproxy on the same machine. my ser is behind NAT too. Would anybody please help me? Thanks, MOhammad here is my ser.cfg # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=4 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=yes check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.71.2 alias=projuktee.com port=5060 children=10 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") # -- auth_db params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 0) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "ha1") modparam("auth_db", "password_column_2", "ha1b") # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 5) # -- register params -- modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) # -- nathelper params -- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # -- rr params -- modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_level", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "cdfimorstup") modparam("acc", "early_media", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); if (loose_route()) { append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("projuktee.com", "0"); setflag(1); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }
SIP trace would be good thing to send as weil... ser.cfg hard to read. Besides it can be UA incompatibility Then ser.cfg will never help -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khan Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:53 PM To: serusers Subject: [Serusers] Please help... I have three UA UA1 -> beeplove@iptel.org (Windows Messenger) UA2 -> beeplove@projuktee.com (Kphone) UA3 -> someone@projuktee.com (Windows Messenger) These three UAs, registering from outside of my network but behind NAT. I can communicate between, UA1 <=> UA2 and UA1 <=> UA3 but not between UA2 <=> UA3 I am running ser-0.9.0 with rtpproxy on the same machine. my ser is behind NAT too. Would anybody please help me? Thanks, MOhammad here is my ser.cfg # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=4 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=yes check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.71.2 alias=projuktee.com port=5060 children=10 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") # -- auth_db params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 0) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "ha1") modparam("auth_db", "password_column_2", "ha1b") # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 5) # -- register params -- modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) # -- nathelper params -- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # -- rr params -- modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_level", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "cdfimorstup") modparam("acc", "early_media", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); if (loose_route()) { append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("projuktee.com", "0"); setflag(1); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Obviously iptel's NAT traversal works better than projuktee's NAT traversal ;-) regards, klaus PS: You can avoid lot of troubles by putting your ser in front of the NAT. Mohammad Khan wrote:
I have three UA UA1 -> beeplove@iptel.org (Windows Messenger) UA2 -> beeplove@projuktee.com (Kphone) UA3 -> someone@projuktee.com (Windows Messenger)
These three UAs, registering from outside of my network but behind NAT.
I can communicate between, UA1 <=> UA2 and UA1 <=> UA3 but not between UA2 <=> UA3
I am running ser-0.9.0 with rtpproxy on the same machine. my ser is behind NAT too.
Would anybody please help me?
Thanks, MOhammad
here is my ser.cfg
# ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=4 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=yes
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.71.2 alias=projuktee.com port=5060 children=10 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
# -- auth_db params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 0) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "ha1") modparam("auth_db", "password_column_2", "ha1b")
# -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 5)
# -- register params -- modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
# -- nathelper params -- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)
# -- rr params -- modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_level", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "cdfimorstup") modparam("acc", "early_media", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1)
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; };
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
if (loose_route()) { append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { if (method=="REGISTER") {
if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("projuktee.com", "0"); setflag(1); break; };
save("location"); break; };
lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); }
route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
You can try a 'tail -f' on your log file while capturing an ngrep output too. Mohammad Khan wrote:
Vitaly Nikolaev wrote:
SIP trace would be good thing to send as weil... ser.cfg hard to read. Besides it can be UA incompatibility
How can I capture SIP trace?
MOhammad
Then ser.cfg will never help
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Steve Blair wrote:
You can try a 'tail -f' on your log file while capturing an ngrep output too.
Here is tail of log file: Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4630]: SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4653]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4634]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4651]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4654]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4659]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4656]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4662]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:14 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4660]: rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4645]: ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: timeout (10) Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4645]: ERROR: tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4645]: ERROR: tcp_send: connect failed Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4645]: msg_send: ERROR: tcp_send failed Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4645]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: sending request failed Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4643]: ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: timeout (10) Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4643]: ERROR: tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed Feb 28 15:25:49 perch /usr/sbin/ser[4643]: ERROR: tcp_send: connect failed Mohammad
Mohammad Khan wrote:
Vitaly Nikolaev wrote:
SIP trace would be good thing to send as weil... ser.cfg hard to read. Besides it can be UA incompatibility
How can I capture SIP trace?
MOhammad
Then ser.cfg will never help
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
If ALL clients are outside your network and SER is behind NAT, you can advertise your public IP in ser.cfg. advertised_address="your public IP" Replace record_route() with record_route_preset("your public IP"). For rtpproxy, I think it must be internet facing (correct me if I'm wrong) beofore it can relay RTP packets outside your network. That means rtpproxy cannot be behind NAT. Zeus
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khan Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 5:53 AM To: serusers Subject: [Serusers] Please help...
I have three UA UA1 -> beeplove@iptel.org (Windows Messenger) UA2 -> beeplove@projuktee.com (Kphone) UA3 -> someone@projuktee.com (Windows Messenger)
These three UAs, registering from outside of my network but behind NAT.
I can communicate between, UA1 <=> UA2 and UA1 <=> UA3 but not between UA2 <=> UA3
I am running ser-0.9.0 with rtpproxy on the same machine. my ser is behind NAT too.
Would anybody please help me?
Thanks, MOhammad
here is my ser.cfg
# ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=4 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=yes
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.71.2 alias=projuktee.com port=5060 children=10 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
# -- auth_db params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 0) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "ha1") modparam("auth_db", "password_column_2", "ha1b")
# -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 5)
# -- register params -- modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
# -- nathelper params -- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)
# -- rr params -- modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_level", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "cdfimorstup") modparam("acc", "early_media", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1)
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; };
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
if (loose_route()) { append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { if (method=="REGISTER") {
if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("projuktee.com", "0"); setflag(1); break; };
save("location"); break; };
lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); }
route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Zeus, Thanks for replying me. Again, My SER behind NAT, so is rtpproxy. rtpproxy and ser running on the same machine. consider these two UA register outside my network. UA1 (kphone) -> beeplove@projuktee.com (my domain) UA2 (windows messenger) -> beeplove@iptel.org (other domain) @ UA1 can send message UA2 and UA2 receives that message @ UA1 can't see UA2's status. In other words, UA1 dont know if UA2 is online. So is UA2. @ As windows messenger can't send message to any user that appears to offline, UA2 can't start sending message to UA1 but UA2 can send message to UA1 once it get message from UA1. What do you think? Mohammad On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 10:16 +1100, Zeus Ng wrote:
If ALL clients are outside your network and SER is behind NAT, you can advertise your public IP in ser.cfg.
advertised_address="your public IP"
Replace record_route() with record_route_preset("your public IP").
For rtpproxy, I think it must be internet facing (correct me if I'm wrong) beofore it can relay RTP packets outside your network. That means rtpproxy cannot be behind NAT.
Zeus
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khan Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 5:53 AM To: serusers Subject: [Serusers] Please help...
I have three UA UA1 -> beeplove@iptel.org (Windows Messenger) UA2 -> beeplove@projuktee.com (Kphone) UA3 -> someone@projuktee.com (Windows Messenger)
These three UAs, registering from outside of my network but behind NAT.
I can communicate between, UA1 <=> UA2 and UA1 <=> UA3 but not between UA2 <=> UA3
I am running ser-0.9.0 with rtpproxy on the same machine. my ser is behind NAT too.
Would anybody please help me?
Thanks, MOhammad
here is my ser.cfg
# ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=4 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=yes
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.71.2 alias=projuktee.com port=5060 children=10 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
# -- auth_db params -- modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 0) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "ha1") modparam("auth_db", "password_column_2", "ha1b")
# -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 5)
# -- register params -- modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
# -- nathelper params -- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)
# -- rr params -- modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_level", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "cdfimorstup") modparam("acc", "early_media", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1)
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; };
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
if (loose_route()) { append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (uri=~"projuktee.com") { if (method=="REGISTER") {
if (!www_authorize("projuktee.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("projuktee.com", "0"); setflag(1); break; };
save("location"); break; };
lookup("aliases"); if (!uri=~"projuktee.com") { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; };
if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); }
route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
If you just want MESSAGE, follow my previous advice. There is no need for rtpproxy. As for online status, the pa module should be able to help. Can't offer much help on this as I don't use this module much. Zeus
-----Original Message----- From: Mohammad Khan Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 4:14 PM To: Zeus Ng Cc: 'serusers' Subject: RE: [Serusers] Please help...
Zeus,
Thanks for replying me.
Again, My SER behind NAT, so is rtpproxy. rtpproxy and ser running on the same machine.
consider these two UA register outside my network. UA1 (kphone) -> beeplove@projuktee.com (my domain) UA2 (windows messenger) -> beeplove@iptel.org (other domain)
@ UA1 can send message UA2 and UA2 receives that message @ UA1 can't see UA2's status. In other words, UA1 dont know if UA2 is online. So is UA2. @ As windows messenger can't send message to any user that appears to offline, UA2 can't start sending message to UA1 but UA2 can send message to UA1 once it get message from UA1.
What do you think?
I am testing my ser server by using Windows Messenger and Kphone. Eventually, I will use phone later. Thanks, MOhammad On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 16:50 +1100, Zeus Ng wrote:
If you just want MESSAGE, follow my previous advice. There is no need for rtpproxy. As for online status, the pa module should be able to help. Can't offer much help on this as I don't use this module much.
Zeus
-----Original Message----- From: Mohammad Khan Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 4:14 PM To: Zeus Ng Cc: 'serusers' Subject: RE: [Serusers] Please help...
Zeus,
Thanks for replying me.
Again, My SER behind NAT, so is rtpproxy. rtpproxy and ser running on the same machine.
consider these two UA register outside my network. UA1 (kphone) -> beeplove@projuktee.com (my domain) UA2 (windows messenger) -> beeplove@iptel.org (other domain)
@ UA1 can send message UA2 and UA2 receives that message @ UA1 can't see UA2's status. In other words, UA1 dont know if UA2 is online. So is UA2. @ As windows messenger can't send message to any user that appears to offline, UA2 can't start sending message to UA1 but UA2 can send message to UA1 once it get message from UA1.
What do you think?
Alle 00:16, martedì 1 marzo 2005, Zeus Ng ha scritto:
For rtpproxy, I think it must be internet facing (correct me if I'm wrong) beofore it can relay RTP packets outside your network. That means rtpproxy cannot be behind NAT.
rtpproxy may work behind nat (with port forwarding) with the patch Greger Teigre provided some times ago, search in the list for 'rtpproxy ip' and you'll get it. My two cents for the main question of the thread: ser.cfg imports nathelper module but doesn't use it, you should try following nathelper ser.cfg examples and add nat operations like fix_nated_sdp, force_rtpproxy, nat_uac_test, on_reply_route... ciao -- Giovanni Balasso giaso@yahoo.it
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 09:59 +0100, Giovanni Balasso wrote:
le 00:16, martedì 1 marzo 2005, Zeus Ng ha scritto:
For rtpproxy, I think it must be internet facing (correct me if I'm wrong) beofore it can relay RTP packets outside your network. That means rtpproxy cannot be behind NAT.
rtpproxy may work behind nat (with port forwarding) with the patch Greger Teigre provided some times ago, search in the list for 'rtpproxy ip' and you'll get it. My two cents for the main question of the thread: ser.cfg imports nathelper module but doesn't use it, you should try following nathelper ser.cfg examples and add nat operations like fix_nated_sdp, force_rtpproxy, nat_uac_test, on_reply_route...
It is because, I am still new in SER :-( Give me time, I will be expert soon :p
ciao
thanks for pointing out this. Please tell me something: If I run rtpproxy on a server that have public IP, it is going to listen udp port 22222, by default. Question is, does rtpproxy need to listen *ONLY* from my ser server? Mohammad
Zeus Ng wrote:
If you just want MESSAGE, follow my previous advice. There is no need for rtpproxy. As for online status, the pa module should be able to help. Can't offer much help on this as I don't use this module much.
Zeus
Yes, for MESSAGE there is no need of RTPProxy. I have just learn it after re-read SER-Introduction by Jan Janak It is because, every MESSAGE must go through sip-proxy. Thanks, MOhammad
-----Original Message----- From: Mohammad Khan Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 4:14 PM To: Zeus Ng Cc: 'serusers' Subject: RE: [Serusers] Please help...
Zeus,
Thanks for replying me.
Again, My SER behind NAT, so is rtpproxy. rtpproxy and ser running on the same machine.
consider these two UA register outside my network. UA1 (kphone) -> beeplove@projuktee.com (my domain) UA2 (windows messenger) -> beeplove@iptel.org (other domain)
@ UA1 can send message UA2 and UA2 receives that message @ UA1 can't see UA2's status. In other words, UA1 dont know if UA2 is online. So is UA2. @ As windows messenger can't send message to any user that appears to offline, UA2 can't start sending message to UA1 but UA2 can send message to UA1 once it get message from UA1.
What do you think?
participants (6)
-
Giovanni Balasso -
Klaus Darilion -
Mohammad Khan -
Steve Blair -
Vitaly Nikolaev -
Zeus Ng