9 Jun
2005
9 Jun
'05
11:45 a.m.
Hello,
I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and failure_route blocks.
Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to execute the 'failure-route' blocks
using the same process as was used for executing the main route script? If it was
possible, I would not need to share state information between different SER processes
Thank you in advance,
Dmitry
10 Jun
10 Jun
6:16 a.m.
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's
already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some
information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see
avpops module)
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards,
Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and
failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to
execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used
for executing the main route script? If it was possible, I would not
need to share state information between different SER processes
Thank you in advance,
Dmitry
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
11:48 a.m.
Hi Marian,
Thank you taking the time to answer my question. The serial forking example
is exactly what I need. Is there a sample "set_fork_list()" function that
you can point me to?
Regards,
Dmitry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marian Dumitru" <marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro>
To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" <isakdim(a)gmail.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same child
process.
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's
already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some
information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see
avpops module)
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards,
Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and
failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to
execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used for
executing the main route script? If it was possible, I would not need to
share state information between different SER processes
Thank you in advance,
Dmitry
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro 
1:26 p.m.
you can either use avpops to populate the fork_list (use avp_write or
avp_load to read from db), either there is a function (not sure about
the name) in lcr module (also to read from db).
bogdan
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
Hi Marian,
Thank you taking the time to answer my question. The serial forking
example is exactly what I need. Is there a sample "set_fork_list()"
function that you can point me to?
Regards,
Dmitry
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marian Dumitru"
<marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro>
To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" <isakdim(a)gmail.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same
child process.
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's
already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some
information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see
avpops module)
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards,
Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hello,
I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and
failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module
to execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was
used for executing the main route script? If it was possible, I
would not need to share state information between different SER
processes
Thank you in advance,
Dmitry
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro 
1:34 p.m.
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
you can either use avpops to populate the fork_list
(use avp_write or
avp_load to read from db), either there is a function (not sure about
the name) in lcr module (also to read from db).
lcr module's sequential forking is based on contacts having different q
values. ser.cfg first needs to call load_contacts() that loads all
contacts to avps and after that ser.cfg needs to call next_contacts() as
many times as there are contacts left or the requests succeeds.
-- juha
6965
days inactive
6966
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Dmitry Isakbayev -
Juha Heinanen -
Marian Dumitru