That is imho a useful thing to add to ser -- but that's better addressed by Andrei, who is owner of the piece of code in question and who is off-line this week.

Are you aware of a client supporting rport?

-Jiri

At 08:10 PM 1/8/2003, Maxim Sobolev wrote:

Hi,

Are there any plans to add SIP Symmetric Response support (http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/firewall/nat/draft-ietf-sip-symmetric...) into SER, so that it would be possible to use compliant UAs behind NATs with SER being on a public IP? The idea is simple: when the SIP packet is received from UA, the server checks if an empty `rport' parameter is present in the first Via field, and if yes then compares IP:PORT in the first Via header with the actual IP:PORT this request came from, and adds `received' and `rport' parameters into the header if either doesn't match before forwarding request further.

Then, when replying or forwarding the request, the server checks if any of received or rport is present and uses it instead of the UA-provided values in corresponding Via header.

Please let me know if there are work in progress on this, so that I will not have to reinvent the wheel.

Thanks!

-Maxim _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/