Hello Daniel.
Yes.. finally all resumes to a missing ACK. The problem is that I can
force the client to repair this…. Is possible to detect this kind of
dialogs in the script?. I know that I can delete these kind of dialogs via
MI commands, but’s not the idea…….
Hope someone can help me here.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Ricardo.-
*De:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
*Enviado el:* martes, 15 de mayo de 2012 3:53
*Para:* Ricardo Martinez
*CC:* SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List
*Asunto:* Re: [SR-Users] Question about dialog module (state 1)
Hello,
so what's the situation now, a missing ACK?
I think such dialogs can be terminated via mi command.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 5/15/12 12:25 AM, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello.
Thanks Daniel for your answer.
Finally we discover the problem why the calls were stalled in state::1, we
do several checks before an INVITE is t_relayed(), this seems to be too
much for certain clients and then they send a INVITE with the same call-id,
this was generating “state::1” dialogs. We solve this issue by sending a
“100 – Trying” right after the INVITE arrives to the proxy, in this way the
caller don’t send a new INVITE… it worked like a charm.
Now we’re trying to see how we can handle certain situations where
“state::3” dialogs are kept in memory. This happened with this type of
calls :
Caller Proxy Callee
INVITE ----------->
--------INVITE --->
<-- 100 Trying ----
<---- Ringing ------
<---- Ringing ------
<---- OK ----------
<---- OK ---------
<---- OK ----------
<---- OK ---------
<---- OK ----------
<---- OK ---------
<---- OK ----------
<---- OK ---------
<---- OK ----------
<---- OK ---------
And then the call is out into state::3.
Is there a way to detect this behavior and clear the dialog before it turns
to state 3????
Hope someone can help me.
Regards,
Ricardo.-
*De:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com]
*Enviado el:* viernes, 11 de mayo de 2012 3:35
*Para:* SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
Users Mailing List
*CC:* Ricardo Martinez
*Asunto:* Re: [SR-Users] Question about dialog module (state 1)
Hello,
what version are you using? Can it be that you initiate the dialog in
config (e.g., via dlg_manage()) and then you reply stateless?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 5/9/12 9:53 PM, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello.
I’m using the dialog module to keep control of simultaneous calls. In some
cases, and I’m still trying to find why this happens, the dialog stays in
“STATE:: 1”, which according to the docs is a dialog which no provisional
response has been sent yet.
Is there a way to eliminate this kind of dialogs???
When I list the dialogs I can see :
dialog:: hash=2523:2040584107
state:: 1
ref_count:: 1
timestart:: 0
timeout:: 0
callid:: 25b8e5354ca0850a4d0bd9c43eeb617a(a)pxext.redvoiss.net
from_uri:: sip:557100052213@pxext.redvoiss.net
from_tag:: as10dc7c85
caller_contact:: sip:557100052213@200.68.19.44:5060
caller_cseq:: 103
caller_route_set::
caller_bind_addr:: udp:64.76.154.110:5060
callee_bind_addr::
to_uri:: sip:0981985480@pxext.redvoiss.net
to_tag::
callee_contact::
callee_cseq::
callee_route_set::
when I try to eliminate this dialog :
kamctl fifo dlg_terminate_dlg
25b8e5354ca0850a4d0bd9c43eeb617a(a)pxext.redvoiss.net
500 command 'dlg_terminate_dlg' failed
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda