> I'm really curious, could you give me a real-world example
of an RTP-detection based soution providing sub-minute dead UA detection ?
Hi Jerome,
Freeradius/MediaProxy/CDRTool combination gives your this zero tolerance. CDRs are always correct down to the second regardless of missing BYEs, VAD and other things you have assumed in the previous postings.
Regards, Adrian
Adrian Georgescu wrote:
Freeradius/MediaProxy/CDRTool combination gives your this zero tolerance. CDRs are always correct down to the second regardless of missing BYEs, VAD and other things you have assumed in the previous postings.
Sure. However, in my experience, there are other ways requires an order of magnitude (or 3) less processing power to acquire accurate billing data.
I have tested openser+asterisk very very extensively - typically maxing out at around 500 simultaneous channels as to not completely stress system to its max for 'billing' tests.
If anyone has actual test data showing openser+asterisk does not provide accurate CDRs, then please present it.
Jeremy McNamara
El Domingo, 13 de Enero de 2008, Jeremy McNamara escribió:
Adrian Georgescu wrote:
Freeradius/MediaProxy/CDRTool combination gives your this zero tolerance. CDRs are always correct down to the second regardless of missing BYEs, VAD and other things you have assumed in the previous postings.
Sure. However, in my experience, there are other ways requires an order of magnitude (or 3) less processing power to acquire accurate billing data.
I have tested openser+asterisk very very extensively - typically maxing out at around 500 simultaneous channels as to not completely stress system to its max for 'billing' tests.
But do you mean that OpenSer + Asterisk requires less processing than OpenSer+MediaProxy+FreeRadius? Both CDR systems use SIP signailling + RTP detection, so both needs to be in the audio path.
Maybe you mean other solutions based on SIP Session Timers and so? (of course not abse on Asterisk... yet XD).
Regards.