-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Hi Klaus,

Of course I agree. It's a matter of time to know what Kamailio stand for. I think Apache is a nicer name than Kamailio, but anyway: I agree the name is mainly a question of personal taste and currently I don't like that taste - nevertheless, I think the name should be changed to a more handy one, just to round up the whole product.

And sure: The name won't stop telcos from using the Software rather that project structure, roadmap and quality.

regards and peace Helmut

Klaus Darilion schrieb: | Helmut Kuper wrote: |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |> Hash: SHA1 |> |> Hm, |> |> well, maybe I have to make it a bit more clear what I meant. Kamailio is |> pronounceable in german, but it is not easy in terms of smoothyness - |> like openser was or freeswitch is ... |> |> KAMAILIO hmmm no, not with the best will in the world: I have problems |> with it to say it without explaining what that name points to. I think |> it is not a good name to inspire confidence. Maybe it needs a slogan to |> explain a bit more :D | | IMO this is all a matter of time. Would you think that Apache is a web | server and Eclipse is an IDE and Asterisk is an IP PBX? Me not. But now, | if you tell one of these names to an IT guy they know what you are | talking about. Thus, in my opinion, we just need some trust in the | product - I do not believe the argument that telcos will use open source | only if the name indicates open/free/SIP.... Nobody uses a product just | because of its name. | | But I have to accept that others don't like name ...:-( | | regards | klaus | |