22 Sep
2005
22 Sep
'05
8:37 p.m.
Hello,
I'm using the lcr module with prefix capability to make failover. When I use
a "big" IP, the lcr module gives back a wrong IP.
It was very hard for me to compile lcr with prefix capability and
ser-0.9.3... has anyone of you a lcr module with prefix-support for
ser-0.9.3 and without this bug?
Thanks!
Sebastian
4:11 p.m.
Hi!
If the last number of the IP is greater than 127, lcr puts out 255.255.255.0
or something like that.
I found something in google and I changed "atoi()" to "atoll()" in the
file
/usr/src/ser-0.x.x/modules/postgres/db_val.c.
I hope that will fix that problem... or not?
Thanks!
Sebastian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juha Heinanen" <jh(a)tutpro.com>
To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner(a)veraza.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] lcr
Sebastian Kühner said:
It was very hard for me to compile lcr with
prefix capability and
ser-0.9.3... has anyone of you a lcr module with prefix-support for
ser-0.9.3 and without this bug?
which bug? how does it show up?
-- juha
24 Sep
24 Sep
3:13 p.m.
Sebastian Kühner writes:
If the last number of the IP is greater than 127, lcr
puts out 255.255.255.0
or something like that.
I found something in google and I changed "atoi()" to "atoll()" in
the file
/usr/src/ser-0.x.x/modules/postgres/db_val.c.
I hope that will fix that problem... or not?
if there is a bug, looks like it is in postgres module, not in lcr
module.
-- juha
27 Sep
27 Sep
1:51 p.m.
Yes. There is a problem in postgres module with unsigned intergers.
http://openser.org/pipermail/devel/2005-July/000279.html
btw: postgresql itself does not support unsigned int. Thus, you have to
use big int in postgres table definitions.
regards
klaus
Sebastian Kühner wrote:
Hi!
If the last number of the IP is greater than 127, lcr puts out 255.255.255.0
or something like that.
I found something in google and I changed "atoi()" to "atoll()" in
the file
/usr/src/ser-0.x.x/modules/postgres/db_val.c.
I hope that will fix that problem... or not?
Thanks!
Sebastian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juha Heinanen" <jh(a)tutpro.com>
To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner(a)veraza.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] lcr
Sebastian Kühner said:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
It was very hard for me to compile lcr with prefix
capability and
ser-0.9.3... has anyone of you a lcr module with prefix-support for
ser-0.9.3 and without this bug?
which bug? how does it show up?
-- juha
7002
days inactive
7007
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Juha Heinanen -
Klaus Darilion -
Sebastian Kühner