3 Jun
2009
3 Jun
'09
1:53 p.m.
Hi
Does Kamailio support SIP Compact Form (RFC 3261, section 7.3.3) ?
Regards,
Pascal
3 Jun
3 Jun
2:03 p.m.
Hello,
On 06/03/2009 01:53 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
Does Kamailio support SIP Compact Form (RFC 3261, section 7.3.3) ?
yes, for parsing
and forwarding. But does not generate local requests
with short form (e.g., notify, msilo messages).
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
3:08 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 06/03/2009 01:53 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote:
So, it does not support long/short form substitution when doing
protocol conversion (i.e. accepting requests over TCP from the UAC and
forwarding them over UDP) even if the UAC included both forms. Is my
understanding correct?
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
Hi
Does Kamailio support SIP Compact Form (RFC 3261, section 7.3.3) ?
yes, for parsing and forwarding. But does not generate local requests with
short form (e.g., notify, msilo messages). 
3:58 p.m.
2009/6/3 Victor Pascual Ávila <victor.pascual.avila(a)gmail.com>om>:
So, it does not support long/short form substitution
when doing
protocol conversion (i.e. accepting requests over TCP from the UAC and
forwarding them over UDP) even if the UAC included both forms. Is my
understanding correct?
Protocol conversion doesn't mind here. If kamailio receives an UDP
INVITE with "f: sip:alice@domain.org" and routes it using TCP, the
short form of the From header (f) will be respected.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
4:22 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
2009/6/3 Victor Pascual Ávila
<victor.pascual.avila(a)gmail.com>om>:
What if it receives a request over TCP and forwards it over UDP? This
is about preventing MTU excess.
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
So, it does not support long/short form
substitution when doing
protocol conversion (i.e. accepting requests over TCP from the UAC and
forwarding them over UDP) even if the UAC included both forms. Is my
understanding correct?
Protocol conversion doesn't mind here. If kamailio receives an UDP
INVITE with "f: sip:alice@domain.org" and routes it using TCP, the
short form of the From header (f) will be respected.
4:29 p.m.
2009/6/3 Victor Pascual Ávila <victor.pascual.avila(a)gmail.com>om>:
This is too much IETF-like dreams ;)
I just would like to ignore it completely, as I ignore the 45% of what
RFC3261 says :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Protocol
conversion doesn't mind here. If kamailio receives an UDP
INVITE with "f: sip:alice@domain.org" and routes it using TCP, the
short form of the From header (f) will be respected.
What if it receives a request over TCP and forwards it over UDP? This
is about preventing MTU excess.
5657
days inactive
5657
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Pascal Maugeri -
Victor Pascual Ávila