Hello Everyone.
I have two questions to pose and/or points to raise:
Question 1 ----------
I'm not 100% convinced that running a web server (ie, serweb) on a SIP proxy (ie, ser) is a good idea.
Suppose someone were to have 500,000 users signed up for VoIP services and many of them used serweb to manage things like speed dial numbers, etc, etc.
IMHO, the web stuff should be seperate from the SIP stuff. If the HTTP traffic demands are 10 times greater than the SIP demands, how can one scale the SIP or HTTP services independently of one another?
Aside from the ser FIFO requirements that serweb has, is there any reason this cannot or should not be different physical servers?
Question 2 ----------
Has anyone ever suggested porting serweb to phpMVC which is the PHP port of the Apache Jakarta Struts framework? I know the serweb appearance can be modified using the <serweb>/templates/*tpl files, but would an MVC framework make more sense?
All responses and feedback are much welcome. Cheers, Paul
_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com
Java Rockx writes:
Aside from the ser FIFO requirements that serweb has, is there any reason this cannot or should not be different physical servers?
apparently you didn't do any gooling on the mailing list, since this issue has been discussed and the current solution to separate them is to use the fifo relay that should be included in ser cvs.
-- juha
Thanks for the info.
--- Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com wrote:
Java Rockx writes:
Aside from the ser FIFO requirements that serweb has, is there any reason this cannot or should not be different physical servers?
apparently you didn't do any gooling on the mailing list, since this issue has been discussed and the current solution to separate them is to use the fifo relay that should be included in ser cvs.
-- juha
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail