Great! Are there performance issues due to the locking in the reply route? regards klaus Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: -- Klaus Darilion nic.at

Brilliant! Thanx for getting this in. I'm assuming that y'all managed to work around the synchronization issues. again - brilliant! cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> To: users openser.org <users(a)openser.org>rg>, devel <devel(a)openser.org> Sent: Friday, February 9, 2007 10:27:29 AM GMT-0600 Subject: [Users] MAJOR FIXUP: avp access in reply route Hi everybody, The ability of accessing/processing AVPs in reply route was a long debated and wanted functionality. Finally, OpenSER 1.2.x fixes this. The new code allows two types of behaviours: - use per message AVPs in reply route - no special synchronization is needed, but there is no persistence outside reply route. - use per transaction AVPS in reply route (as in failure route). the above behaviours apply to the reply routes triggered by TM. You can control this via the new TM parameter "onreply_avp_mode": http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN303 in default reply route only per message AVPs will be available. regards, bogdan _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- ******************************************* Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya (703) 386-1500 x9100 CTO mahesh(a)aptela.com Aptela, Inc. http://www.aptela.com "Aptela: How Business Answers The Call" *******************************************