Hello,
given the work for 5.0 which will bring major changes on source tree structure, I am considering to remove the - (dash) from the modules that have it in the name. There are 4 of them now:
cpl-c janssonrpc-c jsonrpc-c jsonrpc-s
One of the reasons is that this kind of name doesn't work for the feature of defining MOD_modname for each loaded module, because - is a separator for ids in config language grammar, so for example, MOD_jsonrpc-c cannot be used in an #!ifdef.
More over, for embedded interpreters, most of exported functions there use kamailio module name as package name, and again this will break. Of course, a different package name can be defined, but won't be coherent anymore.
Anyone against this renaming?
Cheers, Daniel
Hello,
to conclude the thread on mailing lists - the modules were updated few days ago, the new names:
cplc janssonrpcc jsonrpcc jsonrpcs
Cheers, Daniel
On 08/12/2016 10:46, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
given the work for 5.0 which will bring major changes on source tree structure, I am considering to remove the - (dash) from the modules that have it in the name. There are 4 of them now:
cpl-c janssonrpc-c jsonrpc-c jsonrpc-s
One of the reasons is that this kind of name doesn't work for the feature of defining MOD_modname for each loaded module, because - is a separator for ids in config language grammar, so for example, MOD_jsonrpc-c cannot be used in an #!ifdef.
More over, for embedded interpreters, most of exported functions there use kamailio module name as package name, and again this will break. Of course, a different package name can be defined, but won't be coherent anymore.
Anyone against this renaming?
Cheers, Daniel
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla