21 Jan
2011
21 Jan
'11
11:10 a.m.
Hi all,
I'm using kamailio 3.1 and I have some problems with parallel forking.
I need to implement parallel forking to different users registered on
kamailio.
So, when call arrives with R-URI= sip:003912345678@<IP_server>, I need
to fork te call to (for example) 2 users: 1001 and 1001.
To do that, I've created my usr_preferences table like this:
+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
|/ id | uuid | username | domain | attribute | type | value | /last_modified
|
+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
|/ 1 | | /003912345678/ | | fork | 0 | 1001 | |
/|/ 2 | | /003912345678/ | | fork | 0 | 1002 | |
/+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
and I've added a code to my kam.cfg like this:
if (is_method("INVITE"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", "REQUEST Invite - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si
ID=$ci\n");
if(avp_db_load("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)"))
{
avp_pushto("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)/g");
}
if(!lookup("location"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Local user offline - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu
T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
sl_send_reply("404", "User Offline");
exit;
}
else
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Local user online - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu
T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
t_relay();
}
}
If 1001 and 1002 are registered everything works fine (1001 Ringing and
1002 ringing).
Ifonly 1001 registered everything works fine (1001 ringing and 1002 is
offline.).
But when 1002 is registered and 1001 in offline, kamailio try to call
1001, find that it's offline ( and I get 404 User Offline") but no call
to 1002 is attempted.
What's wrong ?
Regards,
Daniel
21 Jan
21 Jan
12:04 p.m.
Hello,
the problem is that lookup(location) is handling only R-URI, so if ruri
is for user XYZ and that is offline, then will return false.
Since you create many branches with avp_pushto(), other destinations
added as extra branches will be not attempted because of
lookup(location) condition.
The best is to relay the call after the avp_pushto(), so you will get
two branches (or more) coming back via loopback and then you do lookup
location for each:
if(src_ip!=myself)
{
if(avp_db_load("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)"))
{
avp_pushto("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)/g");
t_relay();
exit;
}
}
if(!lookup("location")) ....
Be sure you skip authentication or other checks when the requests comes
back due to such loop, using if(src_ip==myself) conditions.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/21/11 11:10 AM, Daniel Grotti wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using kamailio 3.1 and I have some problems with parallel forking.
I need to implement parallel forking to different users registered on
kamailio.
So, when call arrives with R-URI= sip:003912345678@<IP_server>, I need
to fork te call to (for example) 2 users: 1001 and 1001.
To do that, I've created my usr_preferences table like this:
+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
|/ id | uuid | username | domain | attribute | type | value |/last_modified
|
+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
|/ 1 | |/003912345678/ | | fork | 0 | 1001 | |
/|/ 2 | |/003912345678/ | | fork | 0 | 1002 | |
/+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
and I've added a code to my kam.cfg like this:
if (is_method("INVITE"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", "REQUEST Invite - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si
ID=$ci\n");
if(avp_db_load("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)"))
{
avp_pushto("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)/g");
}
if(!lookup("location"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Local user offline - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu
T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
sl_send_reply("404", "User Offline");
exit;
}
else
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Local user online - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu
T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
t_relay();
}
}
If 1001 and 1002 are registered everything works fine (1001 Ringing
and 1002 ringing).
Ifonly 1001 registered everything works fine (1001 ringing and 1002 is
offline.).
But when 1002 is registered and 1001 in offline, kamailio try to call
1001, find that it's offline ( and I get 404 User Offline") but no
call to 1002 is attempted.
What's wrong ?
Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com
2:13 p.m.
Thank you Daniel,
That was what I was looking for.
Cheers,
Daniel G.
Il 21/01/2011 12:04, Daniel-Constantin Mierla ha scritto:
Hello,
the problem is that lookup(location) is handling only R-URI, so if
ruri is for user XYZ and that is offline, then will return false.
Since you create many branches with avp_pushto(), other destinations
added as extra branches will be not attempted because of
lookup(location) condition.
The best is to relay the call after the avp_pushto(), so you will get
two branches (or more) coming back via loopback and then you do lookup
location for each:
if(src_ip!=myself)
{
if(avp_db_load("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)"))
{
avp_pushto("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)/g");
t_relay();
exit;
}
}
if(!lookup("location")) ....
Be sure you skip authentication or other checks when the requests
comes back due to such loop, using if(src_ip==myself) conditions.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/21/11 11:10 AM, Daniel Grotti wrote:
--
*Ing. Daniel Grotti - */System Engineer/
/Certified Asterisk Professional dCAP/
/Mobile: +39 331 6907200
Office: +39 059 821672
Fax: +39 059 821492/
/Web//: /_/www.klarya.it/ <http://www.klarya.it/>_/
/***
****
*
This e-mail transmission may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. Please do not read it if you are not the
intended recipient(s). Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender and destroy the original
transmission.
Hi all,
I'm using kamailio 3.1 and I have some problems with parallel forking.
I need to implement parallel forking to different users registered on
kamailio.
So, when call arrives with R-URI= sip:003912345678@<IP_server>, I
need to fork te call to (for example) 2 users: 1001 and 1001.
To do that, I've created my usr_preferences table like this:
+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
|/ id | uuid | username | domain | attribute | type | value | /last_modified
|
+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
|/ 1 | | /003912345678/ | | fork | 0 | 1001 | |
/|/ 2 | | /003912345678/ | | fork | 0 | 1002 | |
/+----+------+------------------+--------+-----------+------+-------+---------------------+
and I've added a code to my kam.cfg like this:
if (is_method("INVITE"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", "REQUEST Invite - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si
ID=$ci\n");
if(avp_db_load("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)"))
{
avp_pushto("$ru/username","$avp(s:fork)/g");
}
if(!lookup("location"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Local user offline - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu
T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
sl_send_reply("404", "User Offline");
exit;
}
else
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Local user online - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu
T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
t_relay();
}
}
If 1001 and 1002 are registered everything works fine (1001 Ringing
and 1002 ringing).
Ifonly 1001 registered everything works fine (1001 ringing and 1002
is offline.).
But when 1002 is registered and 1001 in offline, kamailio try to call
1001, find that it's offline ( and I get 404 User Offline") but no
call to 1002 is attempted.
What's wrong ?
Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com 
5062
days inactive
5062
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel Grotti -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla