Hi all, I am testing with SER 0.8.11 and I see the following problem: I have record-route enabled. The mysterious behaviour is the following: SER adds a Record-Route header to an INVITE-Request which does not only consist of the host-portion of the proxy but also of a user-name. As a consequence (I assume) loose_route does not work on such a Route-header. Below I have documented the received and forwarded Request of SER. Does anybody have an idea what might be wrong? Help very much appreciated. Franz The INVITE received by SER: INVITE sip:snom@sip.fehome SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.1:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK97357ABBD8044AC5A3F32B0D76D4DCF6 From: wpc <sip:wpc@sip.fehome>;tag=2950742891 To: <sip:snom@sip.fehome> Contact: <sip:wpc@192.168.0.1:5060> Call-ID: 4A927B68-574F-423F-9BDB-ECEAC88CD4BC(a)192.168.0.1 CSeq: 56548 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Type: application/sdp User-Agent: X-Lite build 1088 Content-Length: 288 ...(SDP-part not shown) The INVITE forwarded by SER after lookup (with record-route enabled): INVITE sip:snom@192.168.0.60:5060;transport=udp;line=1 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:snom@192.168.0.78;ftag=2950742891;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.78;branch=z9hG4bKe8f2.44610675.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.1:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK97357ABBD8044AC5A3F32B0D76D4DCF6 From: wpc <sip:wpc@sip.fehome>;tag=2950742891 To: <sip:snom@sip.fehome> Contact: <sip:wpc@192.168.0.1:5060> Call-ID: 4A927B68-574F-423F-9BDB-ECEAC88CD4BC(a)192.168.0.1 CSeq: 56548 INVITE Max-Forwards: 69 Content-Type: application/sdp User-Agent: X-Lite build 1088 Content-Length: 288 ...(SDP-part not shown)