17 Oct
2019
17 Oct
'19
1:06 p.m.
Hi!
I have small problem. When I assign $fU or $fn in request-route and then
one more time I make new assignment in branch_route. Instead of rewriting
it is just concatenate needed value at the end. lets assume
$avp(cli)=1234567 and $avp(cliplus)=+1234567. So if in request_route I
do $fU=$avp(cli); and then in branch_route $fU=$avp(cliplus);. $fU becomes
one string: "1234567+1234567". Is it a bug or I missing something?
Here is config snippet:
request_route {
...
route(MY);
...
}
route[MY] {
...
$avp(cli) = "1234567"
$avp(cliplus) = "+"+$avp(cli);
$fU=$avp(cli); # here $fU=1234567
$fn=$avp(cli); # here $fn=1234567
route(LCR_ROUTE);
exit;
}
route[LCR_ROUTE]
{
if(!is_method("INVITE"))
return;
if (!load_gws("1",$rU,$avp(cli))) {
send_reply("503", "Error loading gateways");
exit;
}
$var(i)=0;
while($(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)])!= $null){
xlog("L_INFO", "loaded
gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]=$(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)]) \n");
$var(i) = $var(i)+1;
}
if (!next_gw()) {
send_reply("503", "No available gateways");
exit;
}
xlog("L_INFO", "request-uri $ru \n");
xlog("L_INFO", "$avp(lcr_gw_uri), $avp(lcr_id)\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "flag $avp(lcr_flag) \n");
t_set_fr(0, 4000);
t_on_failure("RTF_LCR_ROUTE");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_CUST");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
branch_route[BRANCH_CUST] {
if ( $avp(lcr_flag) == 4) {
$fU=$avp(cliplus); #here $fU=1234567+1234567
$fn=$avp(cliplus); #here $fn=1234567+1234567
}
}
Jurijs
17 Oct
17 Oct
9:59 p.m.
Hi,
Just to add one more point that $fU & $fn I'm checking not in script but in
SIP packet. So using sngrep i see in SIP packet from header where $fU and
$fn are "1234567+123456".
Jurijs
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jurijs Ivolga <jurijs.ivolga(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi!
I have small problem. When I assign $fU or $fn in request-route and then
one more time I make new assignment in branch_route. Instead of rewriting
it is just concatenate needed value at the end. lets assume
$avp(cli)=1234567 and $avp(cliplus)=+1234567. So if in request_route I
do $fU=$avp(cli); and then in branch_route $fU=$avp(cliplus);. $fU becomes
one string: "1234567+1234567". Is it a bug or I missing something?
Here is config snippet:
request_route {
...
route(MY);
...
}
route[MY] {
...
$avp(cli) = "1234567"
$avp(cliplus) = "+"+$avp(cli);
$fU=$avp(cli); # here $fU=1234567
$fn=$avp(cli); # here $fn=1234567
route(LCR_ROUTE);
exit;
}
route[LCR_ROUTE]
{
if(!is_method("INVITE"))
return;
if (!load_gws("1",$rU,$avp(cli))) {
send_reply("503", "Error loading gateways");
exit;
}
$var(i)=0;
while($(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)])!= $null){
xlog("L_INFO", "loaded
gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]=$(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)]) \n");
$var(i) = $var(i)+1;
}
if (!next_gw()) {
send_reply("503", "No available gateways");
exit;
}
xlog("L_INFO", "request-uri $ru \n");
xlog("L_INFO", "$avp(lcr_gw_uri), $avp(lcr_id)\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "flag $avp(lcr_flag) \n");
t_set_fr(0, 4000);
t_on_failure("RTF_LCR_ROUTE");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_CUST");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
branch_route[BRANCH_CUST] {
if ( $avp(lcr_flag) == 4) {
$fU=$avp(cliplus); #here $fU=1234567+1234567
$fn=$avp(cliplus); #here $fn=1234567+1234567
}
}
Jurijs
10:22 p.m.
Hello,
assigning to $fn, $fu or $fU is offered as a convenience way to update
parts of From header, but the changes are not applied immediately, like
the other operations done over the SIP headers -- see more details in
the FAQ:
-
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_header…
In your case, try to do those changes only in branch_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.10.19 20:59, Jurijs Ivolga wrote:
Hi,
Just to add one more point that $fU & $fn I'm checking not in script
but in SIP packet. So using sngrep i see in SIP packet from header
where $fU and $fn are "1234567+123456".
Jurijs
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jurijs Ivolga <jurijs.ivolga(a)gmail.com
<mailto:jurijs.ivolga@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi!
I have small problem. When I assign $fU or $fn in request-route
and then one more time I make new assignment in
branch_route. Instead of rewriting it is just concatenate needed
value at the end. lets assume $avp(cli)=1234567 and
$avp(cliplus)=+1234567. So if in request_route I
do $fU=$avp(cli); and then in branch_route $fU=$avp(cliplus);. $fU
becomes one string: "1234567+1234567". Is it a bug or I missing
something?
Here is config snippet:
request_route {
...
route(MY);
...
}
route[MY] {
...
$avp(cli) = "1234567"
$avp(cliplus) = "+"+$avp(cli);
$fU=$avp(cli); # here $fU=1234567
$fn=$avp(cli); # here $fn=1234567
route(LCR_ROUTE);
exit;
}
route[LCR_ROUTE]
{
if(!is_method("INVITE"))
return;
if (!load_gws("1",$rU,$avp(cli))) {
send_reply("503", "Error loading gateways");
exit;
}
$var(i)=0;
while($(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)])!= $null){
xlog("L_INFO", "loaded
gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]=$(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)]) \n");
$var(i) = $var(i)+1;
}
if (!next_gw()) {
send_reply("503", "No available gateways");
exit;
}
xlog("L_INFO", "request-uri $ru \n");
xlog("L_INFO", "$avp(lcr_gw_uri), $avp(lcr_id)\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "flag $avp(lcr_flag) \n");
t_set_fr(0, 4000);
t_on_failure("RTF_LCR_ROUTE");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_CUST");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
branch_route[BRANCH_CUST] {
if ( $avp(lcr_flag) == 4) {
$fU=$avp(cliplus); #here $fU=1234567+1234567
$fn=$avp(cliplus); #here $fn=1234567+1234567
}
}
Jurijs
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 21-23, 2019, Berlin, Germany -- https://asipto.com/u/kat
11:11 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
I got that changes are not applied immediately. When I check SIP packet
itself what was sent out I see that from header has user part equal to
"1234567+123456". I think this might be a bug...
Thank you!
On Thu, 17. Oct 2019 at 22:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
assigning to $fn, $fu or $fU is offered as a convenience way to update
parts of From header, but the changes are not applied immediately, like the
other operations done over the SIP headers -- see more details in the FAQ:
-
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_header…
In your case, try to do those changes only in branch_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.10.19 20:59, Jurijs Ivolga wrote:
Hi,
Just to add one more point that $fU & $fn I'm checking not in script but
in SIP packet. So using sngrep i see in SIP packet from header where $fU
and $fn are "1234567+123456".
Jurijs
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jurijs Ivolga <jurijs.ivolga(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Jurijs
Hi!
I have small problem. When I assign $fU or $fn in request-route and then
one more time I make new assignment in branch_route. Instead of rewriting
it is just concatenate needed value at the end. lets assume
$avp(cli)=1234567 and $avp(cliplus)=+1234567. So if in request_route I
do $fU=$avp(cli); and then in branch_route $fU=$avp(cliplus);. $fU becomes
one string: "1234567+1234567". Is it a bug or I missing something?
Here is config snippet:
request_route {
...
route(MY);
...
}
route[MY] {
...
$avp(cli) = "1234567"
$avp(cliplus) = "+"+$avp(cli);
$fU=$avp(cli); # here $fU=1234567
$fn=$avp(cli); # here $fn=1234567
route(LCR_ROUTE);
exit;
}
route[LCR_ROUTE]
{
if(!is_method("INVITE"))
return;
if (!load_gws("1",$rU,$avp(cli))) {
send_reply("503", "Error loading gateways");
exit;
}
$var(i)=0;
while($(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)])!= $null){
xlog("L_INFO", "loaded
gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]=$(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)]) \n");
$var(i) = $var(i)+1;
}
if (!next_gw()) {
send_reply("503", "No available gateways");
exit;
}
xlog("L_INFO", "request-uri $ru \n");
xlog("L_INFO", "$avp(lcr_gw_uri), $avp(lcr_id)\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "flag $avp(lcr_flag) \n");
t_set_fr(0, 4000);
t_on_failure("RTF_LCR_ROUTE");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_CUST");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
branch_route[BRANCH_CUST] {
if ( $avp(lcr_flag) == 4) {
$fU=$avp(cliplus); #here $fU=1234567+1234567
$fn=$avp(cliplus); #here $fn=1234567+1234567
}
}
Jurijs
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 21-23, 2019, Berlin, Germany -- https://asipto.com/u/kat
--
18 Oct
18 Oct
12:08 a.m.
Hello,
changing content in SIP headers is practically done as two operations:
- delete old value
- insert the new value where the old value started
By doing two changes to the same content (without an intermediate msg
apply changes), practically you insert two new values where the old
value started. The result being that the two new values appear one after
the other.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.10.19 22:11, Jurijs Ivolga wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I got that changes are not applied immediately. When I check SIP
packet itself what was sent out I see that from header has user part
equal to "1234567+123456". I think this might be a bug...
Thank you!
On Thu, 17. Oct 2019 at 22:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
assigning to $fn, $fu or $fU is offered as a convenience way to
update parts of From header, but the changes are not applied
immediately, like the other operations done over the SIP headers
-- see more details in the FAQ:
-
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_header…
In your case, try to do those changes only in branch_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.10.19 20:59, Jurijs Ivolga wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 21-23, 2019, Berlin, Germany -- https://asipto.com/u/kat
Hi,
Just to add one more point that $fU & $fn I'm checking not in
script but in SIP packet. So using sngrep i see in SIP packet
from header where $fU and $fn are "1234567+123456".
Jurijs
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jurijs Ivolga
<jurijs.ivolga(a)gmail.com <mailto:jurijs.ivolga@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi!
I have small problem. When I assign $fU or $fn in
request-route and then one more time I make new assignment in
branch_route. Instead of rewriting it is just concatenate
needed value at the end. lets assume $avp(cli)=1234567 and
$avp(cliplus)=+1234567. So if in request_route I
do $fU=$avp(cli); and then in
branch_route $fU=$avp(cliplus);. $fU becomes one string:
"1234567+1234567". Is it a bug or I missing something?
Here is config snippet:
request_route {
...
route(MY);
...
}
route[MY] {
...
$avp(cli) = "1234567"
$avp(cliplus) = "+"+$avp(cli);
$fU=$avp(cli); # here $fU=1234567
$fn=$avp(cli); # here $fn=1234567
route(LCR_ROUTE);
exit;
}
route[LCR_ROUTE]
{
if(!is_method("INVITE"))
return;
if (!load_gws("1",$rU,$avp(cli))) {
send_reply("503", "Error loading gateways");
exit;
}
$var(i)=0;
while($(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)])!= $null){
xlog("L_INFO", "loaded
gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]=$(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)]) \n");
$var(i) = $var(i)+1;
}
if (!next_gw()) {
send_reply("503", "No available gateways");
exit;
}
xlog("L_INFO", "request-uri $ru \n");
xlog("L_INFO", "$avp(lcr_gw_uri), $avp(lcr_id)\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "flag $avp(lcr_flag) \n");
t_set_fr(0, 4000);
t_on_failure("RTF_LCR_ROUTE");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_CUST");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
branch_route[BRANCH_CUST] {
if ( $avp(lcr_flag) == 4) {
$fU=$avp(cliplus); #here $fU=1234567+1234567
$fn=$avp(cliplus); #here $fn=1234567+1234567
}
}
Jurijs
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 21-23, 2019, Berlin, Germany --
https://asipto.com/u/kat
--
Jurijs
12:12 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
Now it is clear. :)
Jurijs
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:08 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
changing content in SIP headers is practically done as two operations:
- delete old value
- insert the new value where the old value started
By doing two changes to the same content (without an intermediate msg
apply changes), practically you insert two new values where the old value
started. The result being that the two new values appear one after the
other.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.10.19 22:11, Jurijs Ivolga wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I got that changes are not applied immediately. When I check SIP packet
itself what was sent out I see that from header has user part equal to
"1234567+123456". I think this might be a bug...
Thank you!
On Thu, 17. Oct 2019 at 22:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
assigning to $fn, $fu or $fU is offered as a convenience way to update
parts of From header, but the changes are not applied immediately, like the
other operations done over the SIP headers -- see more details in the FAQ:
-
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_header…
In your case, try to do those changes only in branch_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.10.19 20:59, Jurijs Ivolga wrote:
Hi,
Just to add one more point that $fU & $fn I'm checking not in script but
in SIP packet. So using sngrep i see in SIP packet from header where $fU
and $fn are "1234567+123456".
Jurijs
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jurijs Ivolga <jurijs.ivolga(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Jurijs
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 21-23, 2019, Berlin, Germany -- https://asipto.com/u/kat
Hi!
I have small problem. When I assign $fU or $fn in request-route and then
one more time I make new assignment in branch_route. Instead of rewriting
it is just concatenate needed value at the end. lets assume
$avp(cli)=1234567 and $avp(cliplus)=+1234567. So if in request_route I
do $fU=$avp(cli); and then in branch_route $fU=$avp(cliplus);. $fU becomes
one string: "1234567+1234567". Is it a bug or I missing something?
Here is config snippet:
request_route {
...
route(MY);
...
}
route[MY] {
...
$avp(cli) = "1234567"
$avp(cliplus) = "+"+$avp(cli);
$fU=$avp(cli); # here $fU=1234567
$fn=$avp(cli); # here $fn=1234567
route(LCR_ROUTE);
exit;
}
route[LCR_ROUTE]
{
if(!is_method("INVITE"))
return;
if (!load_gws("1",$rU,$avp(cli))) {
send_reply("503", "Error loading gateways");
exit;
}
$var(i)=0;
while($(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)])!= $null){
xlog("L_INFO", "loaded
gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]=$(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)]) \n");
$var(i) = $var(i)+1;
}
if (!next_gw()) {
send_reply("503", "No available gateways");
exit;
}
xlog("L_INFO", "request-uri $ru \n");
xlog("L_INFO", "$avp(lcr_gw_uri), $avp(lcr_id)\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "flag $avp(lcr_flag) \n");
t_set_fr(0, 4000);
t_on_failure("RTF_LCR_ROUTE");
t_on_branch("BRANCH_CUST");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
branch_route[BRANCH_CUST] {
if ( $avp(lcr_flag) == 4) {
$fU=$avp(cliplus); #here $fU=1234567+1234567
$fn=$avp(cliplus); #here $fn=1234567+1234567
}
}
Jurijs
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 21-23, 2019, Berlin, Germany -- https://asipto.com/u/kat
--
1868
days inactive
1869
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Jurijs Ivolga