Hello,

do not arm failure route for CANCEL (avoid calling t_on_failure("1") if method is CANCEL). Also, why you arm failure route after t_relay?

Cheers, Daniel

On 11/20/08 11:51, Krunal Patel wrote:

Hi

Here is snap of my cfg which show how it handles cancel.. @@@@@@@@ route() { ... ... if (method=="CANCEL") { route(1); exit; } ... ... }

route[1] { t_on_reply("1");

if (!t_relay()) {
    sl_reply_error();
} else
{
    xlog( " -------------- cheked t reply --- \n ");
}
t_on_failure("1");

}

@@@@@@@@

Please let me know what I am doing wrong. Thanks, Krunal Patel

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,


On 11/18/08 09:50, Krunal Patel wrote:

    Hi,

    When I am sending high volume calls to openser , I am getting
    WARNING:tm:run_failure_handlers: no UAC or CANCEL support (1, 0).
    Please help me to find out the cause of it.
    I am using openser 1.2.3. <http://1.2.3.> <http://1.2.3.>

do you set failure route for CANCEL?

1.2.x is no longer supported, being a rather old release, it is
highly recommended to upgrade to 1.4, there are a lot o bug fixed
and improvements.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com

---

---

Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Hello,

On 11/21/08 11:02, Krunal Patel wrote:

Hi I have removed t_on_failure("1") & tested now I am not getting the Warning. Would you please explain me what was the cause of the Warning & why it was giving the warning is I add failure route?

the warning was because you arm failure route for CANCEL. You can leave the failure_route if you need it, but filter out the arming of it if the method==CANCEL.

It is pointless to do failure routing for CACNEL, it is against RFC, therefore that warning message.

Cheers, Daniel

Thanks Krunal Patel

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

do not arm failure route for CANCEL (avoid calling
t_on_failure("1") if method is CANCEL). Also, why you arm failure
route after t_relay?

Cheers,
Daniel


On 11/20/08 11:51, Krunal Patel wrote:

    Hi

    Here is snap of my cfg which show how it handles cancel..
    @@@@@@@@
    route()
    {
    ...
    ...
    if (method=="CANCEL") {
           route(1);
           exit;
     }
    ...
    ...
    }

    route[1] {
       t_on_reply("1");
         if (!t_relay()) {
           sl_reply_error();
       } else
       {
           xlog( " -------------- cheked t reply --- \n ");
       }
       t_on_failure("1");
    }

    @@@@@@@@

    Please let me know what I am doing wrong.
    Thanks,
    Krunal Patel

    On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
    <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
    <mailto:miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>> wrote:

       Hello,


       On 11/18/08 09:50, Krunal Patel wrote:

           Hi,

           When I am sending high volume calls to openser , I am
    getting
           WARNING:tm:run_failure_handlers: no UAC or CANCEL
    support (1, 0).
           Please help me to find out the cause of it.
           I am using openser 1.2.3. <http://1.2.3.>
    <http://1.2.3.> <http://1.2.3.>


       do you set failure route for CANCEL?

       1.2.x is no longer supported, being a rather old release, it is
       highly recommended to upgrade to 1.4, there are a lot o bug
    fixed
       and improvements.

       Cheers,
       Daniel

       --    Daniel-Constantin Mierla
       http://www.asipto.com


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------



    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:Users@lists.kamailio.org>
    http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com

---

---

Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users