[Serusers] radius accounting problem - sr-users

4 Jun 2004


      hello friends,
i could able to test successfully radius
authentication
but when iam doing the radius accounting its giveing
the problem .
i have removed the radius_acc radius_auth auth_radius
group_radius uri_radius from exclude section of the
Makefile of the ser and in the acc module Makefile
i have removed the comments to the statements
DEFS+=-DRAD_ACC
LIBS=-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lradiusclient
and i made make all , make install
when i run ser in the debug mode its giveing message
like
0(7530) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc
 0(7530) set_mod_param_regex: parameter
<radius_config> not found in module <acc>
 0(7530) parse error (76,57-58): Can't set module
parameter
 0(7530) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc
 0(7530) set_mod_param_regex: found <log_level> in
module acc [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so]
and its shutting down .
and my ser.cfg file is
#
# $Id: nathelper.cfg,v 1.1.2.1 2003/11/24 14:47:18
janakj Exp $
#
# simple quick-start config script including nathelper
support
# This default script includes nathelper support. To
make it work
# you will also have to install Maxim's RTP proxy. The
proxy is enforced
# if one of the parties is behind a NAT.
#
# If you have an endpoing in the public internet which
is known to
# support symmetric RTP (Cisco PSTN gateway or
voicemail, for example),
# then you don't have to force RTP proxy. If you don't
want to enforce
# RTP proxy for some destinations than simply use
t_relay() instead of
# route(1)
#
# Sections marked with !! Nathelper contain
modifications for nathelper
#
# NOTE !! This config is EXPERIMENTAL !
#
# ----------- global configuration parameters
------------------------
debug=8                 # debug level (cmd line:
-dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=yes        # (cmd line: -E)
/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode
fork=no
log_stderror=yes
*/
check_via=no    # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no           # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no      # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
# ------------------ module loading
----------------------------------
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
# Uncomment this if you want digest authentication
# mysql.so must be loaded !
#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"
# !! Nathelper
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters
---------------
# -- usrloc params --
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode",   0)
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
# for persistent storage and comment the previous line
#modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("auth_radius", "radius_config",
"/root/radiusclient.conf")
modparam("auth_radius","service_type",15)
modparam("acc","radius_config","/root/radiusclient.conf")
#modparam("acc","service_type",15)
#modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1)
#modparam("acc","radius_missed_flag",3)
modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
# -- auth params --
# Uncomment if you are using auth module
#
#modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
#
# If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which
true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter)
#
#modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# !! Nathelper
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping
interval 30 s
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)   # Ping
only clients behind NAT
# -------------------------  request routing logic
-------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
        # max_forwards==0, or excessively long
requests
        if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
                sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
                break;
        };
        if (msg:len >=  max_len ) {
                sl_send_reply("513", "Message too
big");
                break;
        };
if (search ("^(Contact|m):
.*@(192.168.|10.|172.16)" ) ){
#       if (uri=~"@server.pol.net.in"){
        log(1,"server private ip");
        };
# !! Nathelper
        # Special handling for NATed clients; first,
NAT test is
        # executed: it looks for via!=received and
RFC1918 addresses
        # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is
used); also,
        # the received test should, if completed,
should check all
        # vias for rpesence of received
        if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
                # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may
indicate that
                # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of
it; unless it is
                # a REGISTER
if (method == "REGISTER" || !
search("^Record-Route:")) {
                    log("LOG: Someone trying to
register from private IP, rewriting\n");
# This will work only for user
agents that support symmetric
                    # communication. We tested quite
many of them and majority is
                    # smart enough to be symmetric. In
some phones it takes a configuration
                    # option. With Cisco 7960, it is
called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is
                    # called "symmetric media" and
"symmetric signalling".
fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite
contact with source IP of signalling
                    if (method == "INVITE") {
                        fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add
direction=active to SDP
                    };
                    force_rport(); # Add rport
parameter to topmost Via
                    setflag(6);    # Mark as NATed
                };
        };
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure
that
        # subsequent messages will go through our
proxy; that's
        # particularly good if upstream and downstream
entities
        # use different transport protocol
        if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should
take the
        # path determined by record-routing
        if (loose_route()) {
                # mark routing logic in request
                append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
                route(1);
                break;
        };
if (!uri==myself) {
                # mark routing logic in request
                append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
                route(1);
                break;
        };
# if the request is for other domain use
UsrLoc
        # (in case, it does not work, use the
following command
        # with proper names and addresses in it)
        if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
# Uncomment this if you want to use digest
authentication
                        if (!radius_www_authorize(""))
{
                                www_challenge("","0");
                        break;
                };
save("location");
                        break;
                };
if (method=="INVITE") {
                log(1, "INVITE\n");
                 setflag(1); /* set for accounting
(the same value as in  log_flag!) */
         };
         if (method=="MESSAGE") {
                 log(1, "MESSAGE\n");
                 setflag(1); /* set for accounting
(the same value as in  log_flag!) */
         };
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") {
                 log (1, "BYE or CANCEL\n");
                 setflag(1);
         };
lookup("aliases");
                if (!uri==myself) {
                        append_hf("P-hint: outbound
alias\r\n");
                        route(1);
                        break;
                };
# native SIP destinations are handled
using our USRLOC DB
                if (!lookup("location")) {
                        sl_send_reply("404", "Not
Found");
                        break;
                };
        };
        append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
        route(1);
}
route[1]
{
        # !! Nathelper
        if
(uri=~"[@:](192.168.|10.|172.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1]).)"
&& !search("^Route:")){
            sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to
private IP addresses");
            break;
        };
# if client or server know to be behind a NAT,
enable relay
        if (isflagset(6)) {
            force_rtp_proxy();
        };
# NAT processing of replies; apply to all
transactions (for example,
        # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are
hard to identify as
        # NATed at the moment of request processing);
look at replies
        t_on_reply("1");
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as
it works reliably
        # even for UDP2TCP
        if (!t_relay()) {
                sl_reply_error();
        };
}
# !! Nathelper
onreply_route[1] {
    # NATed transaction ?
    if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]")
{
        fix_nated_contact();
        force_rtp_proxy();
    # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and
we did not
    # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918
contacts)
    } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) {
        fix_nated_contact();
    };
}
so please guide me how to move forward and
get the solution kindly
with regards 
rama kanth
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/