Re: [Users] #DEFINE equivalent? - sr-users

30 Aug 2005

because i didn't think of it?

:-)

cheers, and thanx

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:

...
  Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya wrote:

  I totally agree.

 Personally, I've been ripping out large chunks of my config file, and 
 replacing it with varioud avpops based stuff - it may be *slightly* 
 more convoluted, but it is completely database configurable, and 
 hence easier to maintain

 re: rr, its actually neither. Its a static, which i'm using to 
 identify NAT'ed clients to account for re-INVITEs 

 why don't you use the append_rr_param() function to added the NAT 
 identifier to the RR hdr? do a normal record_route() and if nat is 
 detected, add the param

 regards,
 bogdan

>
> cheers
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>
>> Hi Kanakatti,
>>
>> I'm for m4'ing  (for the moment) for two reasons:
>>    1) since we can do it with m4, I prefer to use the cycles for 
>> something still missing;
>>    2) using dynamic parameters (like via AVPs) reduce the 
>> performance - time to look for the AVP and most critical the 
>> impossibility of calling fixup functions at startup (which will 
>> force to fix params at runtime, for each processing).
>>
>> regarding the record_route_preset() - do you use dynamic parameters 
>> or dynamic rr URI?
>>
>> regards,
>> bogdan
>
> 