New subject: [Serusers] Mediaproxy | none of caller or called party is local

16 Jun 2004

Thanks Adrian.
Its working now :)
I missed the db_url bit for the domain module in ser.cfg

Regards,

Dhiraj

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Georgescu [mailto:ag@ag-projects.com]
Sent: 16 June 2004 13:42
To: Bhuyan,D,Dhiraj,XSG1 R
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Mediaproxy | none of caller or called party is local

Dhiraj, 

Mediaproxy is looking in From: and To: Make sure the domains of either user is in ser
domain table 

Example: For user 1234(a)bt.com 

serctl domain add bt.com 

Adrian 

-------- 

Hello List, 

I am trying to set up the following senario - 

[kphone A]-----------[ser/mediaproxy A]---------------------[ser/mediaproxy
B]-----------[kphone B] 

When I try to set up a call between the two ends, proxydispatcher complains that
"none of the caller or called party is local. will not use mediaproxy". 

I am not using DNS SRV at the moment - instead will be using the default unix socket. 

Kphone A and B are registered respectively to ser/mediaproxy A and B respectively. Anybody
has any hint where this thing might be failing? I tried to go through the code - but
python is not one stronghold. How does the dispatcher decide whether "caller or
called" party is local? 

Thanks for your help, 

Dhiraj Bhuyan 

Network Security Specialist, 

BT Exact Business Assurance Solutions 

Tel: +44 1473 643932 

Mob: +44 7962 012145 

Email: dhiraj.2.bhuyan at bt.com 

RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy | none of caller or called party is local