Hello:
Can anyone speak to how the CC-Diversion field is used by Cisco gateways? It is my understanding that adding this header field in SER will result in the Cisco gateway setting the calling party id to the value in the CC-Diversion header. Is this correct?
I'm asking because we have an Octel 350 voice mail system that I would like to use for mailbox for IP phone users. The 350 expects a physical SMDI circuit for the call signaling path and a different circuit for the message body path. It would be great to allow the SIP signaling exiting our IP cloud through a Cisco gateway to be able to tell the Octel system to which subscriber mailbox the message should be delivered.
Thanks,Steve
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Steve Blair wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone speak to how the CC-Diversion field is usedby Cisco gateways? It is my understanding that adding this header field in SER will result in the Cisco gateway setting the calling party id to the value in the CC-Diversion header. Is this correct?
I'm asking because we have an Octel 350 voice mail system thatI would like to use for mailbox for IP phone users. The 350 expects a physical SMDI circuit for the call signaling path and a different circuit for the message body path. It would be great to allow the SIP signaling exiting our IP cloud through a Cisco gateway to be able to tell the Octel system to which subscriber mailbox the message should be delivered.
You can use Remote-Party-ID header to tell Cisco gateway the calling number it must present to PSTN side.
Saludos JesusR.
------------------------------- Jesus Rodriguez VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L. jesusr@voztele.com http://www.voztele.com Tel. 902360305 -------------------------------
This may help: http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#AEN1018
-jiri
At 04:09 PM 6/17/2004, Steve Blair wrote:
Hello:
Can anyone speak to how the CC-Diversion field is used by Cisco gateways? It is my understanding that adding this header field in SER will result in the Cisco gateway setting the calling party id to the value in the CC-Diversion header. Is this correct?
I'm asking because we have an Octel 350 voice mail system that I would like to use for mailbox for IP phone users. The 350 expects a physical SMDI circuit for the call signaling path and a different circuit for the message body path. It would be great to allow the SIP signaling exiting our IP cloud through a Cisco gateway to be able to tell the Octel system to which subscriber mailbox the message should be delivered.
Thanks,Steve
--
ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396 215-746-7903
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
-
Jesus Rodriguez -
Jiri Kuthan -
Steve Blair