New subject: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy

3 Dec 2003

I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.

I'll let you know how it goes..

-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy

Darren,

3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8.  Maxim also put some
time into it but I was never able to get it to compile.  If you have better
luck please let us all know.

Thanks,
Andres.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darren Sessions" &lt;dsessions(a)ionosphere.net&gt;
To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" &lt;pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de&gt;
Cc: &lt;serusers(a)lists.iptel.org&gt;
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy

...
  I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra
1400t with Solaris 9.
...

 root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
 cc  -o main.o -c main.c
 In file included from main.c:45:
 myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
 main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
 main.c: In function `main':
 main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
 make: *** [main.o] Error 1

 I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.

 I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the Makefile.gnu
...
  up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled
"for Solaris".

 Any help would be appreciated! :)

 Thanks,

  - Darren

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
 [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
 To: Darren Sessions
 Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
 Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy

 On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions &lt;dsessions(a)ionosphere.net&gt; wrote:
...
   Someone
correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for Nathelper  and
  Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with
dual network cards? 
 No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they must
 be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).

 Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to avoid
  packets with different source address than the destination of the intial
  packet going back to the nat).

 then
 talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and the
 Portaone RTP taking the voice packets? 

 Andrei

 _______________________________________________
 Serusers mailing list
 serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
 http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers