could you pls explain ..how are you implementing call hunting.....well i am also implementing SER and need same feature by this time i am writning it in module...do u have any other possibility....
From: Matt Hess mhess@livewirenet.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] hunt groups? Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:01:04 -0700
I'm trying to do hunt groups in ser..
I've come to the conclusion that to do multiple hunt groups I need to call an external script that replies with the next uri to call when it looks at the current one being sent to it.. ie: sent returned 3039930010 3039930006 3039930006 3039930007 3039930007 3039930008 3039930008 3039930006
However on entering the failure route I have found that the current uri is not being updated to reflect the one it has received.. so ser keeps looping on the first 2 numbers in the hunt..
here are my route blocks..
route[2] { log(1, "LOG: entered hunt route"); t_on_failure("2"); exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }
failure_route[2] { log(1, "LOG: Hit failure_route 2"); t_on_failure("2"); exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }
so on the example above it routes to the first 06 and 07 numbers properly but when I would think 07 would be the uri sent to the perl script an environment check sees that 06 is still being sent as the $SIP_USER
any ideas as to what I need to do?
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_________________________________________________________________ Masterpieces made affordable! Buy art prints. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/42736.asp MSN Shopping.
I want to send an updated uri to the exec'd script but beyond 2 updates to the uri ser seems to fail to update the uri..
so when the failure route keeps being called the last number it had just tried is sent but that doesn't seem to happen and I'm wondering if this is a bug in ser as it would seem so.. to me at least.
Say the hunt number is dialed.. route(2) is called.. which calls the script.. the hunt number is sent properly to the script and the script returns the first number in the hunt properly.. (06 in my example). Now if that number is busy ser drops to the failure_route[2] and 06 is sent back to the script and the script returns 07.. ok now if that number is busy failure_route[2] should be called again. But instead of sending 07 to the the script as the number last dialed (or current uri) ser sends 06 again to the script which to me seems like an incorrect behavior..?
Kapil Dhawan wrote:
could you pls explain ..how are you implementing call hunting.....well i am also implementing SER and need same feature by this time i am writning it in module...do u have any other possibility....
From: Matt Hess mhess@livewirenet.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] hunt groups? Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:01:04 -0700
I'm trying to do hunt groups in ser..
I've come to the conclusion that to do multiple hunt groups I need to call an external script that replies with the next uri to call when it looks at the current one being sent to it.. ie: sent returned 3039930010 3039930006 3039930006 3039930007 3039930007 3039930008 3039930008 3039930006
However on entering the failure route I have found that the current uri is not being updated to reflect the one it has received.. so ser keeps looping on the first 2 numbers in the hunt..
here are my route blocks..
route[2] { log(1, "LOG: entered hunt route"); t_on_failure("2"); exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }
failure_route[2] { log(1, "LOG: Hit failure_route 2"); t_on_failure("2"); exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }
so on the example above it routes to the first 06 and 07 numbers properly but when I would think 07 would be the uri sent to the perl script an environment check sees that 06 is still being sent as the $SIP_USER
any ideas as to what I need to do?
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Masterpieces made affordable! Buy art prints. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/42736.asp MSN Shopping.
So.. did anyone have any ideas as to what I may be doing wrong?
Matt Hess wrote:
I want to send an updated uri to the exec'd script but beyond 2 updates to the uri ser seems to fail to update the uri..
so when the failure route keeps being called the last number it had just tried is sent but that doesn't seem to happen and I'm wondering if this is a bug in ser as it would seem so.. to me at least.
Say the hunt number is dialed.. route(2) is called.. which calls the script.. the hunt number is sent properly to the script and the script returns the first number in the hunt properly.. (06 in my example). Now if that number is busy ser drops to the failure_route[2] and 06 is sent back to the script and the script returns 07.. ok now if that number is busy failure_route[2] should be called again. But instead of sending 07 to the the script as the number last dialed (or current uri) ser sends 06 again to the script which to me seems like an incorrect behavior..?
Kapil Dhawan wrote:
could you pls explain ..how are you implementing call hunting.....well i am also implementing SER and need same feature by this time i am writning it in module...do u have any other possibility....
From: Matt Hess mhess@livewirenet.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] hunt groups? Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:01:04 -0700
I'm trying to do hunt groups in ser..
I've come to the conclusion that to do multiple hunt groups I need to call an external script that replies with the next uri to call when it looks at the current one being sent to it.. ie: sent returned 3039930010 3039930006 3039930006 3039930007 3039930007 3039930008 3039930008 3039930006
However on entering the failure route I have found that the current uri is not being updated to reflect the one it has received.. so ser keeps looping on the first 2 numbers in the hunt..
here are my route blocks..
route[2] { log(1, "LOG: entered hunt route"); t_on_failure("2"); exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }
failure_route[2] { log(1, "LOG: Hit failure_route 2"); t_on_failure("2"); exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }
so on the example above it routes to the first 06 and 07 numbers properly but when I would think 07 would be the uri sent to the perl script an environment check sees that 06 is still being sent as the $SIP_USER
any ideas as to what I need to do?
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Masterpieces made affordable! Buy art prints. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/42736.asp MSN Shopping.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Kapil Dhawan -
Matt Hess