14 Nov
2007
14 Nov
'07
9:41 a.m.
Hi, I need to send SIP traffic from my OpenSer to a Nortel CS2000 (SIP_2_PSTN
gateway).
I have a bad new: the provider tells me that they set the callerid with
the "From" I send.
I've asked them to support "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity" headers
(still
waiting for a reply).
In case I can only use "From" I can modify it with UAC module, but I also know
this is very anti-RFC3261 behaviour.
Does anyone know if Nortel CS2000 can use "RPID" or
"P-Asserted-Identity" to
set the PSTN calling number?
What do you think about changing From header? for example:
200(a)domain.com -> 00123223223234@IP
Thanks for any response.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
14 Nov
14 Nov
10:06 a.m.
Hola Iñaki,
Hi, I need to send SIP traffic from my OpenSer to a
Nortel CS2000
(SIP_2_PSTN
gateway).
I have a bad new: the provider tells me that they set the callerid
with
the "From" I send.
I've asked them to support "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity"
headers
(still
waiting for a reply).
In case I can only use "From" I can modify it with UAC module, but
I also know
this is very anti-RFC3261 behaviour.
Does anyone know if Nortel CS2000 can use "RPID" or "P-Asserted-
Identity" to
set the PSTN calling number?
What do you think about changing From header? for example:
200(a)domain.com -> 00123223223234@IP
Your option is to use UAC module. If you rewrite the From: header
directly you can have interop problems.
Saludos
JesusR.
------------------------------------
Jesus Rodriguez
VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L.
jesusr(a)voztele.com
http://www.voztele.com
Tel. 902360305
-------------------------------------
10:14 a.m.
El Wednesday 14 November 2007 13:06:06 Jesus Rodriguez escribió:
Thanks a lot.
Based in your experience (and other people's experience here): is it normal a
SIP_PSTN provider just support callerid in the "From" header and doesn't
support "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity"?
That it occurs in "real life"?
I assume Nortel CS2000 allows "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity" (not
sure but I
suppose it), but maybe the provider limites it and just allows "From"?
Best regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
I can modify
From it with UAC module, but I also know
this is very anti-RFC3261 behaviour.
Does anyone know if Nortel CS2000 can use "RPID" or "P-Asserted-
Identity" to set the PSTN calling number?
What do you think about changing From header? for example:
200(a)domain.com -> 00123223223234@IP
Your option is to use UAC module. If you rewrite the From: header
directly you can have interop problems.
10:16 a.m.
Hola Iñaki,
El Wednesday 14 November 2007 13:06:06 Jesus Rodriguez
escribió:
Thanks a lot.
Based in your experience (and other people's experience here): is
it normal a
SIP_PSTN provider just support callerid in the "From" header and
doesn't
support "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity"?
That it occurs in "real life"?
I assume Nortel CS2000 allows "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity" (not
sure but I
suppose it), but maybe the provider limites it and just allows "From"?
You will find all kind of behaviors out there... some carriers
support rpid/pai, some don't... some softswitches/gateways will
support them, some not or will depend on the firmware version loaded
in the boxes.
Yes, it's not funny but real life ;)
Saludos
JesusR.
------------------------------------
Jesus Rodriguez
VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L.
jesusr(a)voztele.com
http://www.voztele.com
Tel. 902360305
-------------------------------------
I can
modify From it with UAC module, but I also know
this is very anti-RFC3261 behaviour.
Does anyone know if Nortel CS2000 can use "RPID" or "P-Asserted-
Identity" to set the PSTN calling number?
What do you think about changing From header? for example:
200(a)domain.com -> 00123223223234@IP
Your option is to use UAC module. If you rewrite the From: header
directly you can have interop problems. 
11:01 a.m.
RPID never made it out of draft. We've been doing the UAC_from
rewrites with no problems. We still use RPID with our cisco media GWs
but plan to switch to P-Asserted-Identity at some point.
One large US ITSP insists on us rewriting the To header which is
really broken:-) We don't use them.
/a
On Nov 14, 2007, at 7:14 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)in.ilimit.es>
wrote:
El Wednesday 14 November 2007 13:06:06 Jesus Rodriguez
escribió:
Thanks a lot.
Based in your experience (and other people's experience here): is it
normal a
SIP_PSTN provider just support callerid in the "From" header and
doesn't
support "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity"?
That it occurs in "real life"?
I assume Nortel CS2000 allows "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity" (not
sure but I
suppose it), but maybe the provider limites it and just allows "From"?
Best regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
I can
modify From it with UAC module, but I also know
this is very anti-RFC3261 behaviour.
Does anyone know if Nortel CS2000 can use "RPID" or "P-Asserted-
Identity" to set the PSTN calling number?
What do you think about changing From header? for example:
200(a)domain.com -> 00123223223234@IP
Your option is to use UAC module. If you rewrite the From: header
directly you can have interop problems.
11:29 a.m.
El Wednesday 14 November 2007 14:01:04 Alan Crosswell escribió:
RPID never made it out of draft. We've been doing
the UAC_from
rewrites with no problems. We still use RPID with our cisco media GWs
but plan to switch to P-Asserted-Identity at some point.
Thanks both fot the help.
One large US ITSP insists on us rewriting the To
header which is
really broken:-) We don't use them.
I hope don't find this need !!
Thanks again.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
10:48 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] [OT] Nortel CS2000 and "RPID" / "P-Asserted-Identity"
Alan Crosswell writes:
RPID never made it out of draft. We've been doing
the UAC_from
rewrites with no problems. We still use RPID with our cisco media GWs
but plan to switch to P-Asserted-Identity at some point.
i don't have good enough net access to check, but does pai header also
support controlling of display of calling number like rpid does with its
privacy parameter? if not, then it cannot be used as a replacement of
rpid header
-- juha
11:03 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] [OT] Nortel CS2000 and "RPID" / "P-Asserted-Identity"
Juha,
I believe this is handled in RFC3325: Private Extensions to the Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Asserted Identity within Trusted Networks,
RFC4497: Interworking between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and
QSIG, and RFC3323: A Privacy Mechanism for the Session Initiation
Protocol (SIP) which is the "Privacy" header.
RFC4497 section 9 says:
"A gateway MAY implement the P-Asserted-Identity header in accordance
with [14]. If a gateway implements the P-Asserted-Identity header,
it SHALL also implement the Privacy header in accordance with [13].
If a gateway does not implement the P-Asserted-Identity header, it
MAY implement the Privacy header."
[13] is RFC3323
[14] is RFC3325
/a
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Alan Crosswell writes:
RPID never made it out of draft. We've been
doing the UAC_from
rewrites with no problems. We still use RPID with our cisco media GWs
but plan to switch to P-Asserted-Identity at some point.
i don't have good enough net access to check, but does pai header also
support controlling of display of calling number like rpid does with its
privacy parameter? if not, then it cannot be used as a replacement of
rpid header
-- juha 
11:06 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] [OT] Nortel CS2000 and "RPID" / "P-Asserted-Identity"
Juha,
PAI/PPI normally goes with Privacy header (see RFC 3325), so it's a
proper replacement for RPID.
Andreas
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Alan Crosswell writes:
RPID never made it out of draft. We've been
doing the UAC_from
rewrites with no problems. We still use RPID with our cisco media GWs
but plan to switch to P-Asserted-Identity at some point.
i don't have good enough net access to check, but does pai header also
support controlling of display of calling number like rpid does with its
privacy parameter? if not, then it cannot be used as a replacement of
rpid header
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users 
15 Nov
15 Nov
5:18 a.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] [OT] Nortel CS2000 and "RPID" / "P-Asserted-Identity"
Andreas Granig schrieb:
Juha,
PAI/PPI normally goes with Privacy header (see RFC 3325), so it's a
proper replacement for RPID.
I once had an issue with signaling network and user provided CLI to the
PSTN. IIRC the conclusion was to put the user provided CLI into From:
and the network provided into PAI.
regards
Klaus
Andreas
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Alan Crosswell writes:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users RPID never made it out of draft. We've been
doing the UAC_from
rewrites with no problems. We still use RPID with our cisco media GWs
but plan to switch to P-Asserted-Identity at some point.
i don't have good enough net access to check, but does pai header also
support controlling of display of calling number like rpid does with its
privacy parameter? if not, then it cannot be used as a replacement of
rpid header
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
14 Nov
14 Nov
2:53 p.m.
El Wednesday 14 November 2007 13:14:13 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
Based in your experience (and other people's
experience here): is it normal
a SIP_PSTN provider just support callerid in the "From" header and doesn't
support "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity"?
That it occurs in "real life"?
I assume Nortel CS2000 allows "RPID" or "P-Asserted-Identity" (not
sure but
I suppose it), but maybe the provider limites it and just allows "From"?
Afortunatelly the provider has just confirmed me that they support both
headers RPID and PAI, yeah! :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
6153
days inactive
6154
days old
10 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Alan Crosswell -
Andreas Granig -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Jesus Rodriguez -
jh＠tutpro.com -
Klaus Darilion