Hi all, I've a doubt regarding a statement at the end of page 5
"... Some important design decisions are associated with carrying assertions in a SIP request. If an assertion is carried by value, or uses a MIME-based content indirection system, then proxy servers will be unable to inspect the assertion themselves. If the assertion were referenced in a header, however, it might be possible for the proxy to acquire and inspect the assertion itself. There ..."
Why a proxy server will be unable to inspect the assertion themself ? SER has functions by which it could be read message body, does this behavior not respect any rfc ? I'm missing something :-S
Thanks in advance, Francesco la Torre
Any idea ? Thanks
Il giorno dom, 07/09/2008 alle 17.37 +0200, Francesco la Torre ha scritto:
Hi all, I've a doubt regarding a statement at the end of page 5
"... Some important design decisions are associated with carrying assertions in a SIP request. If an assertion is carried by value, or uses a MIME-based content indirection system, then proxy servers will be unable to inspect the assertion themselves. If the assertion were referenced in a header, however, it might be possible for the proxy to acquire and inspect the assertion itself. There ..."
Why a proxy server will be unable to inspect the assertion themself ? SER has functions by which it could be read message body, does this behavior not respect any rfc ? I'm missing something :-S
Thanks in advance, Francesco la Torre _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
For record purpose: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg24665.html
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Francesco la Torre frankernet@tiscali.it wrote:
Hi all, I've a doubt regarding a statement at the end of page 5
"... Some important design decisions are associated with carrying assertions in a SIP request. If an assertion is carried by value, or uses a MIME-based content indirection system, then proxy servers will be unable to inspect the assertion themselves. If the assertion were referenced in a header, however, it might be possible for the proxy to acquire and inspect the assertion itself. There ..."
Why a proxy server will be unable to inspect the assertion themself ? SER has functions by which it could be read message body, does this behavior not respect any rfc ? I'm missing something :-S
Thanks in advance, Francesco la Torre _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Sometimes cross posting is necessary :-S
Francesco la Torre
Il giorno lun, 08/09/2008 alle 22.03 +0200, Victor Pascual Ávila ha scritto:
For record purpose: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg24665.html
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Francesco la Torre frankernet@tiscali.it wrote:
Hi all, I've a doubt regarding a statement at the end of page 5
"... Some important design decisions are associated with carrying assertions in a SIP request. If an assertion is carried by value, or uses a MIME-based content indirection system, then proxy servers will be unable to inspect the assertion themselves. If the assertion were referenced in a header, however, it might be possible for the proxy to acquire and inspect the assertion itself. There ..."
Why a proxy server will be unable to inspect the assertion themself ? SER has functions by which it could be read message body, does this behavior not respect any rfc ? I'm missing something :-S
Thanks in advance, Francesco la Torre _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Francesco la Torre frankernet@tiscali.it wrote:
Sometimes cross posting is necessary :-S
No prob-- just wanted to record (archives) a pointer to that thread.
-
Francesco la Torre -
Victor Pascual Ávila