21 Mar
2007
21 Mar
'07
11:01 a.m.
is it so that currently parameter n of call route(n) needs to be an
integer constant, i.e., that use of a pseudo variable is not possible?
-- juha
21 Mar
21 Mar
4:26 p.m.
On 03/21/07 11:01, Juha Heinanen wrote:
is it so that currently parameter n of call route(n)
needs to be an
integer constant, i.e., that use of a pseudo variable is not possible?
yes, still needs to be a integer. we can add to wishlist for next
release to be able to give a PV.
Cheers,
Daniel
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:33 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 03/21/07 11:01, Juha Heinanen wrote:
... or a string :-)
regards
klaus
is it so that currently parameter n of call
route(n) needs to be an
integer constant, i.e., that use of a pseudo variable is not possible?
yes, still needs to be a integer. we can add to wishlist for next
release to be able to give a PV. 
5:37 p.m.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 16:33 +0100, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I second this.
Currently, I do use m4 macros to get that, but if I can do without it,
the better :-) Besides, this feature looks particulary good in last SER
versions config files :-)
On 03/21/07 11:01, Juha Heinanen wrote:
... or a string :-) is it so that currently parameter n of call
route(n) needs to be an
integer constant, i.e., that use of a pseudo variable is not possible?
yes, still needs to be a integer. we can add to wishlist for next
release to be able to give a PV.
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:47 p.m.
On 03/21/07 17:37, Jerome Martin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 16:33 +0100, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
same I did, not feeling a strong demand for something
else to route's
parameter as I do m4 macros for many other values in the config. I was
looking some time ago to embed m4 in openser, but couldn't get a C
library for that. Is anybody aware of any m4 C library?
Cheers,
Daniel
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I second this.
Currently, I do use m4 macros On 03/21/07 11:01, Juha Heinanen wrote:
... or a string :-)
is it so that currently parameter n of call
route(n) needs to be an
integer constant, i.e., that use of a pseudo variable is not possible?
yes, still needs to be a integer. we can add to wishlist for next
release to be able to give a PV.
to get that, but if I can do without it,
the better :-) Besides, this feature looks particulary good in last SER
versions config files :-)
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6:48 p.m.
I second
this.
Currently, I do use m4 macros
same I did, not feeling a strong demand for
something else to route's
parameter as I do m4 macros for many other values in the config. I was
looking some time ago to embed m4 in openser, but couldn't get a C
library for that. Is anybody aware of any m4 C library?
Sorry, nope. I though that GNU m4 had a linkable C object compiled by
default, but I did not double check that.
However, one issue I see there is the debugging complexity this adds :
how do you know the line of a parse error ? You can know where it is
located in the m4-preprocessed version; but never in the original m4
config file. This is one of the issues I see with using m4.
9:39 p.m.
On 03/21/07 18:48, Jerome Martin wrote:
Don't get me wrong, having text labels in routes would not be enough for
me to stop using m4, only not having to use it for THAT. :-)
knew that, just added my reason why adding string labels for routes was
low priority.
By separating the macros definition and m4 config files, you can use
"divert" to purge the output of macros file, the result will be pretty
much similar with m4 confi file.
Cheers,
Daniel
I second this.
Currently, I do use m4 macros
same I did, not feeling a strong demand for something else to route's
parameter as I do m4 macros for many other values in the config.
I was
looking some time ago to embed m4 in openser, but couldn't get a C
library for that. Is anybody aware of any m4 C library?
Sorry, nope. I though that GNU m4 had a linkable C object compiled by
default, but I did not double check that.
However, one issue I see there is the debugging complexity this adds :
how do you know the line of a parse error ? You can know where it is
located in the m4-preprocessed version; but never in the original m4
config file. This is one of the issues I see with using m4.
22 Mar
22 Mar
12:57 p.m.
By separating the macros definition and m4 config
files, you can use
"divert" to purge the output of macros file, the result will be pretty
much similar with m4 confi file.
That is, you'll get the line numbers right if you use macros generating
at most one line, but the column will still be wrong.
In my case, I have really complex macros (mostly generating SQL queries,
subsequent PV assignations, checking, etc.), and this does not work :-(
Jérôme Martin | LongPhone
Responsable Architecture Réseau
122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris
Tel : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44
Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45
Mail : jmartin(a)longphone.fr
Web : www.longphone.com
6461
days inactive
6462
days old
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Jerome Martin -
jh＠tutpro.com -
Klaus Darilion